DIAMETER BY BASAL AREA RATIO AND COMPETITION ZONES IN Eucalyptus saligna MONOCLONAL STAND

Authors

  • Paulo Renato Schneider UFSM
  • César Augusto Guimarães Finger
  • Paulo Sérgio Pigatto Schneider
  • Frederico Dimas Fleig
  • Cláudio Thomas
  • Jorge Antônio de Farias

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/198050984519

Keywords:

relative density, growth, self-thinning.

Abstract

The present work was developed in order to study the relation among the diameter and the basal area, the competition zones, the relative density, and the self-tinning in Eucalyptus saligna Smith monoclonal stand, with 238 pair’s data basis of permanent sampling by full density stand distribution, observed from 3 to 18 years old. The results obtained allowed to conclude that Tang’s density model was very precise and efficient. The self-thinning begins when the population reaches an average diameter of 8 cm. The relative density was equal 34.46%, with line gradient of 1.5818 (b). The maximum current annual increment in diameter and between the relative densities was observed between the ages of 14 and 15 years when the relative densities were 12.5% and 25%, characterizing a free growth competition zone among the individuals of the population. The zone of increasing competition between the relative densities of 25 and 50% and the imminent mortality zone occurred between the relative densities of 50 and 100%. The density model allowed detecting five competition zones, in the development of the stands, defined by zones of: excessive space, free growth, increase of competition, complete stock and imminent mortality, in relation to the relative density of the population.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ARCHIBALD, D. J.; BOWLING, C. Jack pine density management diagram for boreal Ontario. Northeast Science & Technology, NEST Technical Note TN-005, 1995, 19 p.

BOROUGH, C. J. et al. Yield statistics. In: HILLIS, W. E., BROWN, A. G. (eds), Eucalyptus for wood production. CSIRO/Academic Press, p.1-225, 1984.

BREDENKAMP, B. V.; BURKHART, H. E. An examination of spacing indices for Eucalyptus grandis. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. New Westminster, v. 20, p. 1909-1916, July, 1990.

CELLINI, J. M. et al. Modelos de perfil de tronco en Nothofagus pumilio (Polp, et Endl,) Krasser y su utilización en el cálculo del volumen total. Invest. Agr,: Sist. Recur. For. Madrid, n. 2, v. 11, p. 245-261, 2002.

CURTIS, R. O. A simple index of stand density for Douglas-fir. Forest Science, Bethesda, n. 1, v. 28, p. 92-94, Mar. 1982.

DEBELL, D. S.; WHITESELL, C. D. Diameter-density relationships provide tentative spacing guidelines for Eucalyptus saligna in Hawaii. United States Department of Agriculture. Berkeley, 1988, 3 p.

DEL RIO, M.; MONTERO, G.; BRAVO, F. Analysis of diameter-density relationships and self-thinning in non-thinned even-aged Scots pine stands. Forest Ecology and Management. Amsterdan, v. 142, p. 79-87, Mar. 2001.

EMBRAPA. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. Brasília: Embrapa, 1999, 412 p.

LAASASENAHO, J.; KOIVUNIEMI, J. Dependence of some stand characteristics on stand density. Tree Physiology. Oxford, v. 7, p. 183-187, 1990.

MORENO, J. A. Clima do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre: Secretaria da Agricultura - Diretoria de Terras e Colonização, 1961, 42 p.

OSAWA, A.; ALLEN, R. B. Allometric theory explains self-thinning relationships of mountain beech and Red pine. Ecology. n. 74, v. 4, p. 1020-1032, Apr. 1993.

PALAHI, M.; MIIMA, J.; MONTERO, E. Stand-level yield model for scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L,) in north-east Spain. Invest. Agr. Sist. Recr. For. Madrid, v. 11, n. 2, p. 409-424, 2002.

REID, R. Diameter-basal area ratio as a practical stand density measure for pruned plantations. Forest Ecology and Management. Amsterdan, v. 233, p. 375-382, Sept. 2006.

REID, R. Silvicultural management of Australian blackwood (Acacia melanoxylon) in plantations and multi-purpose forests. In: GOVE, J. H. Structural stocking guides: a new look at an old friend. National Research Council Canada. Ottawa, v. 34, n. 5, May, 2004.

REINEKE, L. H. Perfecting a stand-density index for even-aged forests. Canadian Agricultural Research. Ottawa, n. 46, p. 627-638, 1933.

SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT user’s guide. Version 8 (computer manual), SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C. 1999.

SMITH, D. J.; WOODS, M. E. Red pine and white pine density management diagrams for Ontario. Ontario: Ministry of Natural Resources, Southcentral Sciences Division, Sault Ste, Marie, ON, 1997, 31 p. (Tech, Rep, n.48)

SMITH, N. J.; HANN, D. W. A growth model based on the self-thinning rule. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. New Westminster, v. 16, n. 2, p. 330-334, Apr. 1986.

STERBA, H.; MONSERUD, R. A. The maximum density concept applied to uneven-aged mixed-species stands. Forest Science. Bethesda, v. 39, n. 3, p. 432-452, Aug. 1993.

TANG, S. et al. A growth and self-thinning model for pure even-aged stands: theory and applications. Forest Ecology and Management. Amsterdan, v. 70, p. 67-73, Dec. 1994.

TANG, S.; MENG, F. R.; MENG, C. H. The impact of initial stand density and site index on maximum stand density index and self-thinning index in a stand self-thinning model. Forest Ecology and Management. Amsterdan, v. 75, p. 61-68, June, 1995.

WEST, P. W.; BOUROUGH, C. J. Tree supervision and the self-thinning, Rule in a monoculture of Pinus radiata D,Don. Annals of Botany. Oxford, v. 52, p. 149-158, 1983.

WESTOBY, M. The place of the self-thinning rule in population dynamics. American Naturalist. v. 118, n. 4, p. 581-587, Oct. 1981.

YODA, K. et al. Self-thinning in over crowed pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions. Jor. Biol. Osaka City Univ. Osaka, v. 14, p. 107-129, 1963.

ZEIDE, B. A relationship between size of trees and their number. Forest Ecology and Management. Amsterdan, v. 72, p. 265-272, Apr. 1995.

ZEIDE, B. Analysis of the 3/2 power law of self-thinning. Forest Science. Bethesda, v. 33, n. 2, p. 17-537, June, 1987.

ZEIDE, B. Self-thinning and stand density. Forest Science. Bethesda, v. 37, n. 2, p. 517-523, June, 1991.

ZEIDE, B. Tolerance and self-tolerance of trees. Forest Ecology and Management. Amsterdan, v. 13, p. 149-166, Nov. 1985.

Published

2011-12-30

How to Cite

Schneider, P. R., Finger, C. A. G., Schneider, P. S. P., Fleig, F. D., Thomas, C., & Farias, J. A. de. (2011). DIAMETER BY BASAL AREA RATIO AND COMPETITION ZONES IN Eucalyptus saligna MONOCLONAL STAND. Ciência Florestal, 21(4), 755–764. https://doi.org/10.5902/198050984519

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>