BIOECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF CARBON FOREST SEQUESTRATION AND OF THE ECOLOGICAL DEBT: AN APPLICATION TO THE CASE OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/19805098433Keywords:
carbon sequestration, clean development mechanism, mitigation strategies, bioeconomic models.Abstract
Though heavily criticized, the Kyoto Protocol has stood out as the key political tool in addressing climate change. However, one of the few instruments that allows industrialized and developing countries to cooperate towards mitigation of GHGs is CDM (Clean Development Mechanism). The underlying assumption of forestry CDM is that forest plantations (afforestation/ reforestation) might help remove carbon dioxide (the most representative GHG) emissions and compensate for the loss of natural forests. Therefore, this study focuses on this alleged trade-off. A bioeconomic analysis, which abstracts out money variables, is applied to assess carbon forest sequestration in Rio Grande do Sul. The state’s forest area is split up into natural and planted forests only. On one hand, this does not allow to check out for deforestation; on the other hand, such a phenomenon is not remarkable in Rio Grande do Sul. The land use is taken into account by a function that works as the emission removal demand. On the other hand, the emission supply function depends on the economic growth rates. The results show that, eventually, the sustainability of economic growth hinges on a region’s or country’s ecological situation – namely, equilibrium, credit or debt. The economic and environmental advantages of each mitigation strategy – CDM and natural forest conservation – are crosschecked. A nearly 40-year-long overshoot rate is, after all, estimated for the forest sector in Rio Grande do Sul. The estimates suggest that CDM might help to relieve environmental stress only where ecological credit is reported. Where ecological debt is already on, CDM was found unable to compensate for conservation disregard.
Downloads
References
ALTMAN, A., AMANN, M., KLAASSEN, G., RUSZCZYŃSKI, A., SCHÖPP, W. Cost-effective sulphur emission reduction under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 90, p.395-412, 1996.
ALVIM, C. F. (coord.) Emissões energéticas 1970/2002. Economia e Energia, n. 41, nov.-dez. 2003. Disponível em: < http://ecen.com >. Acesso em: 26 maio 2008.
AMADO, A. M. O real e o monetário em Economia: traços ortodoxos e heterodoxos do pensamento econômico. In: SILVA, M. L. F. (org) Moeda e produção: teorias comparadas. Brasília: Ed. da Universidade de Brasília, 1992. p. 285-314.
AMANN, M., KLAASSEN, G. Cost-effective strategies for reducing nitrogen deposition in Europe. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 43, p.289-311, 1995.
AYRES, R. U. The second law, the fourth law, recycling and limits to growth. Ecological Economics, v. 29, p. 473-483, 1999.
AYRES, R. U. Resources, scarcity, growth and the environment. Fontainebleau, France: Centre for the Management of Environmental Resources: INSEAD, 2001. 35p. (Working paper 97/13/EPS)
AYRES, R. U. On the life cycle metaphor: where ecology and economics diverge. Ecological Economics, v. 48, p. 425-438, 2004.
BARROSO, L. C., BARROSO, M. M. de A., CAMPOS FILHO, F. F., CARVALHO, M. L. B. de, MAIA, M. L. Cálculo numérico: com aplicações. 2.ed. São Paulo: Harbra, 1987.
BARTOLI, H. A economia, serviço de vida: crise do capitalismo, uma política de civilização. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget, 1996. (Coleção economia e política; 54)
BRAGA, B., HESPANHOL, I. CONEJO, J. G. L., MIERZWA, J. C., BARROS, M. T. L. de, SPENCER, M., PORTO, M., NUCCI, N., JULIANO, N., EIGER, S. Introdução à engenharia ambiental. 2.ed. São Paulo: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2005.
COMMON, M. S. Environmental and resource economics: an introduction. 2nd ed. New York: Longman, 1996.
EHRHART, K. –M., SCHLEICH, J. Comércio dos direitos de emissão. Scientific American Brasil, São Paulo, n. 12, p. 82-5, set. 2005. Edição especial.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). Global forest resources assessment update 2005: terms and definitions (final version). Rome: Forest Resources Assessment Programme, 2004. (Working paper; 83/E)
FISHER, I. [1907] A teoria do juro: determinada pela impaciência por gastar renda e pela oportunidade de investi-la. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1984. 356p. (Os economistas)
GETTING SERIOUS IN BALI. The Economist, 3rd Dec. 2007. Disponível em: <http://www.economist.com/world/international/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10237931> Acesso em: 03 dez. 2007.
HOAG, D. L., ASCOUGH II, J. C.; ENGLER-PALMA, A. The impact matrix approach and decision rules to enhance index dimensionality, flexibility and representation. Ecological Indicators, v. 2, p.161-168, 2002.
HUTTON, J. P., HALKOS, G. E. Optimal acid rain abatement policy for Europe: an analysis for the year 2000. Energy Economics, v. 17, n. 4, p. 259-275, 1995.
IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística). SIDRA: extração vegetal. Disponível em: <http://www.sidra.ibge.gov.br/bda/extveg/default.asp?z=t&o=16&i=P >. Acesso em: 26 maio 2008.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Climate change 2007: the physical science basis – summary for policy makers. In: ______. IPCC fourth assessment report: climate change 2007. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC Secretariat: WMO, 2007. 21p.
IUCN (The World Conservation Union), WWF (World Wildlife Fund). Changing realities: ecosystem approaches and sustainable forest management. Arborvitæ, Oct. 2004. 12p.
LEHTONEN, M. The environmental-social interface of sustainable development: capabilities, social capital, institutions. Ecological Economics, v. 49, p. 99-214, 2004.
LOHMANN, L. Carbon trading: a critical conversation on climate change, privatisation and power. Uppsala, Sweden: The Dag Hammarskjöld Centre: Corner House, Sept. 2006. (Development dialogue; 48)
MARTÍNEZ ALIER, J. Da economia ecológica ao ecologismo popular. Blumenau: Edifurb, 1998. (Coleção sociedade e ambiente; 2)
MARTÍNEZ ALIER, J. The environmentalism of the poor: a study of ecological conflicts and valuation. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, 2002.
MERICO, L. F. K. Introdução à economia ecológica. Blumenau: Edifurb, 2002. (Coleção sociedade e ambiente; 1)
MILES, D., SCOTT, A. Macroeconomia: compreendendo a riqueza das nações. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2005.
MUELLER, C. C. Os economistas e as relações entre o sistema econômico e o meio ambiente. Brasília: UnB: Finatec, 2007.
MUNDA, G. Métodos y procesos multicriterio para la evaluación social de las políticas públicas. Revista de la Red Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica, v.1, p. 1-25, 2004.
MUNDA, G., NIJKAMP, P., RIETVELD, P. Qualitative multicriteria evaluation for environmental management. Ecological Economics, v. 10, p.97-112, 1994.
MUNIER, N. Economic growth and sustainable development: could multicriteria analysis be used to solve this dichotomy? Environment, Development and Sustainability, v.8, p.425-443, 2006.
NICCOLUCCI, V., PULSELLI, F. M., TIEZZI, E. Strengthening the threshold hypothesis: economic and biophysical limits to growth. Ecological Economics, v. 60 p. 667-672, 2007.
NIEMANN, B. L. Regional acid deposition calculations with the IBM PC Lotus 1-2-3 system. Environmental Software, v. 1, n. 3, p.175-181, 1986.
PATTERSON, M. G. Commensuration and theories of value in ecological economics. Ecological Economics, v. 25, p. 105-125, 1998.
ROMEIRO, A. R. Economia ou Economia Política da sustentabilidade. In: MAY, P. H., LUSTOSA, M. C., VINHA, V. da (orgs.). Economia do meio ambiente : teoria e prática. Rio de Janeiro : Elsevier, 2003. Introdução, p. 1-29.
SACHS, J. D., LARRAIN B., F. Macroeconomia: em uma economia global. São Paulo: Pearson Education do Brasil, 2000.
SBS (Sociedade Brasileira de Silvicultura). Estatísticas: setor florestal brasileiro. São Paulo, 2001. Disponível em: < http://www.sbs.org.br/estatisticas.htm >. Acesso em: 31 out. 2006.
SCHNEIDER, P. R., FLORIANO, E. P., SCHNEIDER, P. S. P., REINERT, D. J. FLOCEN – Plano estratégico de desenvolvimento florestal : Região Central do estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Santa Maria: FACOS/UFSM, 2005b.
SCHUMPETER, J. A. Value and money. In:______ [1954] History of economic analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994. 1260 p. ch. 6, p. 276-334.
SEDJO, R. A., MARLAND, G. Inter-trading permanent emissions credits and rented temporary carbon emissions offsets: some issues and alternatives. Climate Policy, v. 3, p. 435-444, 2003.
SÖDERSTEN, B., REED, G. International economics. 3rd ed. London: MacMillan Press, 1994.
SRAFFA, P. [1960] Produção de mercadorias por meio de mercadorias: prelúdio a uma crítica da teoria econômica. São Paulo: Nova Cultural, 1997. 121p. (Os Economistas)
STERN, N. The economics of climate change: the Stern review. Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University Press: Cabinet Office – HM Treasury, 2006. Disponível em: <http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/independent_reviews/stern_review_economics_climate _change/stern_review report.cfm >. Acesso em: 11 nov. 2006.
VILLAVICENCIO, A. Mitos y realidad del Mecanismo de Desarrollo Limpio. Revista de la Red Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica, v. 1, 2004. Disponível em: <http://www.redibec.org/archivos/revibec.htm >. Acesso em: 08 jan. 2006.
WACKERNAGEL, M., REES, W. Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the Earth. Gabriola Island, BC, Canada: New Society Publishers, 1996. (The new catalyst bioregional series; 9)
WILLIAMSON, J. A economia aberta e a economia mundial: um texto de economia internacional. 3. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 1989.
