Determinant factors for building the soybean yield potential in southern Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X40599Keywords:
Diversification, Genetic Material, ScarificationAbstract
The soybean is an alternative of diversification and financial return to the rice farmer. However, it presents difficulties of cultivation and low yield due to the physical characteristics of the soil. In this scenario, the objective of this work was to verify the influence of soil scarification, the genetic material used and the sowing date. Three soybean cultivars, with yield potential classified as “medium”, “high” and “very high”, were sown in a scarified and non-scarified area, in the dates november 7th and december 10th, year of 2018. The scarification opperation occurred on october 1st. Initial establishment varied according to cultivar, soil mechanism and sowing date. Soil scarification effect was verified up to 100 days after the operation. Within the construction of the yield potential, scarification accounted for 14.4 %, sowing date 12.5 % and genetic material 73.1 % of crop grain yield, in the “high” and “very high” potential materials.
Downloads
References
EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA AGROPECUÁRIA, Embrapa Solos. Manual de Métodos de Análise de Solo. 2° edição. Rio de janeiro: Embrapa, 2011.
EMBRAPA – Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Solos (Rio de Janeiro, RJ). Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. Brasília: Embrapa Produção de Informação, 2013.
GARCIA, A. et al. Instalação da lavoura de soja: época, cultivares, espaçamento e população de plantas. Circular Técnica. 2007.
PEIXOTO, C. P. et al. Sowing date and plant density of soybean yield components and grain yield. Scientia Agricola, v. 57, n. 1, p. 153-162, 2000.
SECCO, D. et al. Produtividade de soja e propriedades físicas de um latossolo submetido a sistemas de manejo e compactação. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo. v. 28, n, 5, p. 797-804, 2004.
STONE, L. F. et al. Integração lavoura-pecuária e o manejo de plantas daninhas. Potafos: ENCARTE TÉCNICO, Potafos, Ia-Brasil, junho de 2004.
PIRES, J. F. B. et al. Adaptações morfofisiológicas da soja em solo inundado. Pesquisa agropecuária brasileira, Brasília, v. 37, n. 1, p. 41-50, 2002.
TAYLOR, H. M. et al. Soil strength root penetration relations for medium to coarse textured soil materials. Soil Science, v. 102, n. 1, p. 18-22, 1966.
TWONLOW, S. J.; PARKINSON, R. J. & REID, I. Temporal changes in soil physical conditions after deep loosening of a silty clay loam in SW England. Soil and Tillage Research, v.31, p.31-47, 1994.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
