Physical quality of grains benefited from rice cultivars produced at different levels of fertilization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X40622Keywords:
Industry, Post-Harvesting, ProcessingAbstract
Rice is one of the most cultivated cereals in the world and the increase in crop yield is associated with cultivars and levels of soil fertilization, and may suffer changes in grain quality after processing. The objective of this work was to evaluate the physical quality of grains of rice benefited as polished and integral of cultivars IR 424 RI and IR 431 CL as a function of different levels of fertilization. After the harvest, the grains were subjected to the debarking and polishing processes. Quality analysis was performed according to the physical classification of rice. The cultivar IR 424 RI obtained higher values of yellow, burned and plastered grains, and in the cultivar IR 431 LC more broken, chopped and stained grains were observed. The average yield of polished rice of cultivar IR 431 CL was 44.54% and cultivar IR 424 RI was 56.80%. Meanwhile, the average yield of whole rice of cultivar IR 431 CL was 65.02% and cultivar IR 424 RI was 73.08%. The increase in the fertilization levels of the rice influenced positively on the yield of whole grains, but did not present satisfactory results regarding the physical quality.
Downloads
References
BRASIL [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Instrução Normativa Nº 6 de 16 de fevereiro de 2009. Regulamento Técnico do Arroz. Available from: <http://sistemasweb.agricultura.gov.br/sislegis/action/detalhaAto.do?method=visualizarAtoPortalMapa&chave=1687046295>. Brasília: Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. [cited 2019 feb 11].
CANELLAS LP; SANTOS GA; MARCHEZAN E. Efeito de práticas de manejo sobre o rendimento de grãos e a qualidade industrial dos grãos em arroz irrigado. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria. 1997; 27(3):375-379.
CARDOSO EA; SOUZA MA de; FONTES PCR; SEDIYAMA T. Fertilização Nitrogenada na absorção de nutrientes e rendimento de grãos em arroz irrigado. Revista Agri-Environmental Sciences, Palmas. 2015; 1(1):39-49.
CASTRO MA; VIEIRA NR de A; RABELO RR; SILVA AS da. Qualidade de grãos de arroz. Santo Antônio de Goiás: Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. Embrapa Arroz e Feijão [Internet]. 1999. [cited 2015 jan 19]. Available from: <http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/208032>.
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Solos. Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. Brasília: Embrapa Produção de Informação; Rio de Janeiro: Embrapa Solos. 3ª ed. 2013; 353 p.
HOSENEY RC. Principios de ciencia y tecnologia de los cereals. Zaragoza: Acribia. 1991; 321 p.
LOPES RA; BUZETTI S; TEIXEIRA FILHO MCM; BENETT CGS; ARF MV. Doses, fontes e épocas de aplicação de nitrogênio em arroz de terras altas cultivado em sistema de semeadura direta. Revista Caatinga, Mossoró. 2013; 26 (4):79-87.
MARCHEZAN E; GODOY OP; MARCOS FILHO J. Relações entre época de semeadura, de colheita e rendimento de grãos inteiros de cultivares de arroz irrigado. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília. 1993; 28 (7):843-848.
MENEZES NL de; PASQUALLI LL; VIDAL MD; CONCEIÇÃO GM. Temperaturas de secagem na integridade física, qualidade fisiológica e composição química de sementes de arroz. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, Goiânia. 2012; 42(4):430-436.
MINGOTTE FLC; HANASHIRO RK; FORNASIERI FILHO D. Características físico-químicas do grão de cultivares de arroz em função da adubação nitrogenada. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, Londrina. 2012; v.33: p.2605-2618.
PORTELLA JA; EICHELBERGER L. Secagem de grãos. Passo Fundo: Embrapa [Internet]. 2001. [cited 2019 feb 19]. Available from: <http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/820442>.
REGITANO NETO A; RAMOS JUNIOR EU; GALLO PB; FREITAS JG de; AZZINI LE. Comportamento de genótipos de arroz de terras altas no estado de São Paulo. Revista Ciência Agronômica, Fortaleza. 2013; 44(3):512-519.
SILVA LP da; ALVES BM; SILVA LS da; POCOJESKI E; KAMINSKI TA; ROBERTO BS. Adubação nitrogenada sobre rendimento industrial e composição dos grãos de arroz irrigado. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria. 2013; 43(6):1128-1133.
Sociedade Sul-Brasileira de Arroz Irrigado. Arroz irrigado: Recomendações Técnicas da Pesquisa para o Sul do Brasil. In: XXXII REUNIÃO TÉCNICA DA CULTURA DO ARROZ IRRIGADO, Farroupilha. 2018. 205 p.
STRECK EA; MAGALHÃES JÚNIOR AM de; FAGUNDES PRR; AGUIAR GA; FACCHINELLO PHK; OLIVEIRA AC de. Adaptability and stability of flood-irrigated rice cultivars released to the subtropical region of Brazil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília. 2018; 53(10):1140-1149.
TELÓ GM; MARCHEZAN E; FERREIRA RB; LÚCIO ADC; SARTORI GMS; CEZIMBRA DM. Qualidade de grãos de arroz irrigado colhidos com diferentes graus de umidade em função da aplicação de fungicida. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria. 2011; 41(6):960-966.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
