Using different spray tips to control diseases in wheat

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X35494

Keywords:

Triticum spp, Fusarium graminerum, Sprayer technology

Abstract

Unstable environmental factors contribute to the incidence of diseases and pests, causing reduced yield and grain contamination, especially the attack by Giberela (Fusarium graminerum). In this scenario, appropriate management techniques are needed. Strategies such as choosing the suitability of the spray tip for chemical control are indispensable. The aim of this study was to use four spray tips: CVI 11002, ADI ISO 11002, TVI ISO 8002 and ATR 8002. The experiment was conducted in the experimental area of The State University of Rio Grande do Sul, in the district of Três Vendas, in Cachoeira do Sul-RS. The cultivar used was TBIO SELETO. The fungicide used was Nativo®. A completely randomized experimental design with 4 replicates and a control plot was adopted. The following parameters were evaluated: weight of one thousand grains (PMG, %), hectoliter weight (PH; kg hL-1) and yield (PRD; kg ha-1). The variance was tested by applying the Snedcor F test (p<0.05) and the means were compared by the Tukey's test (p<0.05). The weight of one thousand grains, hectoliter weight and yield were not influenced by the use of different spray tips adopted in the wheat phytosanitary control.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Alicia Baumhardt Dorneles, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Cachoeira do Sul, RS

Formação em Técnico em Agropecuária pela Escola Estadual Técnica Nossa Senhora da Conceição de Cachoeira do Sul em 2016. Atualmente acadêmica do curso de graduação em Engenharia Agrícola da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) - Campus Cachoeira do Sul e integrante do grupo de pesquisa Geotecnologias Aplicada á Produção Agrícola (GeoAPA) orientado pelo professor Eduardo Leonel Bottega.

Eduardo Leonel Bottega, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Cachoeira do Sul, RS

Engenheiro Agrônomo formado pela Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados (UFGD, 2008). Mestre (2011) e Doutor (2014) em Engenharia Agrícola, área de concentração em Mecanização Agrícola, pela Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV). Atualmente é Professor Adjunto no curso de Engenharia Agrícola, da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), campus de Cachoeira do Sul.

Zanandra Boff de Oliveira, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM, Campus Cachoeira do Sul, Cachoeira do Sul, RS.

Professora adjunta da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Campus Cachoeira do Sul. Possui graduação em Engenharia Agrícola pela Universidade Regional Integrada do Alto do Uruguai e das Missões - Santiago (2009), graduação em Grad. de Formação de Prof. para a Ed. Profissional pela Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (2012), mestrado em Ciência do Solo pela Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (2011) e doutorado em Engenharia Agrícola pela Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (2015).

Alberto Eduardo Knies, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Cachoeira do Sul, RS

Possui graduação em Agronomia pela Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM (2002-07), mestrado em Ciência do Solo pela UFSM (2008-10), na área de concentração de Processos Físicos e Morfogenéticos do Solo e, doutorado em Engenharia Agrícola pela UFSM (2010-2014), na área de concentração de Engenharia de Água e Solo. Atualmente é professor adjunto na Universidade Estadual do Rio Grande do Sul (Uergs) Unidade em Cachoeira do Sul na área de engenharia agrícola e Coordenador do Curso de Agronomia.

Clarissa Moraes da Silva, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Cachoeira do Sul, RS

Estudante do curso de Graduação em Engenharia Agrícola na Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - Campus Cachoeira do Sul.

Irajá Jantsch de Souza, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Cachoeira do Sul, RS

Formado em Técnico em Mecânica pelo SENAI Carlos Tannschauser de Santa Cruz do Sul -RS em 2015. Acadêmico de Engenharia Agrícola pela Univerisdade Federal de Santa Maria - Campus Cachoeira do Sul. Atualmente participa do Grupo de Ensino e Pesquisa em Ambiência e Biometeorologia (GEPAB), orientado pela Professora Zanandra Boff de Oliveira.

References

CASA, R. T.; BOGO, A; MOREIRA, E. Época de aplicação e desempenho de fungicidas no controle da giberela em trigo. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, v.37, n.6, p.1558-1563, 2007.

CONAB – Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento. Acompanhamento da safra brasileira de grãos 2016-2017. Brasília, v. 4, n. 12, p. 1-158, 2017. Disponível em: <https://www.conab.gov.br/OlalaCMS/uploads/arquivos/17_09_12_09_01_56_boletim_graos_setembro_2017.pdf> Acesso em: 16 março 2017.

DEL PONTE, E.M. et al. Deoxynivalenol and nivalenol in commercial wheat grain related to Fusarium head blight epidemics in southern Brazil. Food Chemistry, v.132, p.1087-1091, 2012.

FERREIRA, P.V. Estatística experimental aplicada à agronomia. Maceió, EDUFAL, 1991. 440p.

MAPA - MINISTÉRIO DA AGRICULTURA, PECUÁRIA E ABASTECIMENTO. Cultura do trigo. Brasília/DF, 2015. Disponível em: <http://www.agricultura.gov.br/vegetal/culturas/trigo> Acesso em: 16 março 2017.

MENEGHETTI, R. C. Tecnologia de aplicação de fungicidas na cultura do trigo. Dissertação de Mestrado, 58p. Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, 2006. Disponível em: < http://cascavel.cpd.ufsm.br/tede/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=2157> Acesso em: 16 março 2017.

SOUZA, R. T.; CASTRO, R. D.; PALLADINI, L. A. Depósito de pulverização com diferentes padrões de gotas em aplicações na cultura do algodoeiro. Revista Engenharia Agrícola, Jaboticabal, v.27, p.75-82, jan. 2007.

STACK, R. W.; McMULLEN, M. P. A visual scale to estimate severity of Fusarium head blight in wheat. North Dakota State University, NDSU Extension Service, PP-1095. 2p. 2011.

STATSOFT, Inc. (2004). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 7. www.statsoft.com.

ZADOKS, J. C.; CHANG, T. T.; KONZAK, C. F. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research, Oxford, v. 14, n. 1, p. 415-421, 1974.

PANISSON, E., et al. Técnicas de aplicação de fungicida em trigo para o controle de giberela (Gibberella zeae)1. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, v.33, n.1, p. 13-20, jan –fev 2003.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-12

How to Cite

Dorneles, A. B., Bottega, E. L., Oliveira, Z. B. de, Knies, A. E., Silva, C. M. da, & Souza, I. J. de. (2019). Using different spray tips to control diseases in wheat. Ciência E Natura, 40, 11–17. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X35494

Issue

CIÊNCIA E NATURA, V. 40, 2018, SPECIAL EDITION: II MOSTRA DE PROJETOS DA UFSM – CAMPUS CACHOEIRA DO SUL

Section

Special Edition

License

To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.

 

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 

Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Most read articles by the same author(s)