Influence of seeding density and nitrogen doses on irrigated corn productivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X86828Keywords:
Management practices, Spring-summer crop, SustainabilityAbstract
Corn is one of the main cereals cultivated in the world and evaluating management strategies that specifically contribute to increasing the productivity of this crop is of fundamental importance. Thus, the objective was to evaluate the yield and productivity components of irrigated corn as a function of seeding density and nitrogen doses in the 2022/23 harvest, in Cachoeira do Sul – RS. The hybrid Forseed 400 was sown on 08/26/22 in the experimental design of randomized blocks with split plots, in the scheme. Factor A consisted of three sowing densities, interrupting the same row spacing of 0.45 m and changing the distribution of plants per linear meter, as follows: i) 3.1 seeds m-1 ii) 3.8 seeds m -1 and iii) 4.8 seeds m-1; the factor “B by two doses of nitrogen (N) in top dressing, with fractional application of urea in the phenological stages of V4 (50%) and V8 (50%), totaling: i) 150 kg N ha-1 and ii) 250 kg N ha-1. Throughout the cycle, 18 irrigations were carried out via conventional sprinkler, totaling 262 mm to supplement the 329 mm of rain. Corn productivity was maximum 12,593.7 kg ha-1 at the highest sowing density and with the highest dose of N.
Downloads
References
ALLEN, R.G. et al. Crop Evapotranspiration. Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage
Paper 56, FAO, Rome, Italy, 300 pp, 1998.
ARGENTA, G. et al. Arranjo de plantas em milho: análise do estado-da-arte. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, v.31, n.6, p.1075-1084,
BEM. L. Análise da Viabilidade Técnica e Econômica da Irrigação em Híbridos de Milho. Tese de Doutorado em Engenharia
Agrícola, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, 2018.
CONAB - Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento. Acompanhamento da Safra Brasileira de Grãos, Brasília, DF, v. 10, safra
/23, n. 7 sétimo levantamento, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.conab.gov.br/info-agro/safras/graos/boletim-da-safra-
de-graos. Acesso 10 jan. 2024.
EMATER/RS-ASCAR. Safra de verão 2023/2024. Acompanhamento de safras. Dados de projeção inicial para a safra. Porto Alegre,
agosto, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.expointer.rs.gov.br/emater-rs-ascar-estima-em-36-mi-toneladas-a-producao-da-
safra-de-verao#:~:text=Buscar%20Buscar-,Emater%2FRS%2DAscar%20estima%20aumento%20de%2049%25%20na,produ%C3%A7%C3%
A3o%20da%20Safra%20de%20Ver%C3%A3o&text=A%20estimativa%20de%20produ%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20para,
(dados%20preliminares%20do%20IBGE). Acesso 10 jan. 2024.
EMBRAPA. Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. 3° edição, 2013.
FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistical Yearbook 2014. 2014. Disponível em:
https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/06dae95a-90e2-4d86-844e-62f32922f0f5. Acesso 10 jan. 2024.
FERREIRA, A. M. et al. Desempenho produtivo e retorno econômico do milho irrigado por aspersão. Irriga, Botucatu, Edição
Especial – Sul, v. 1, n. 2, p. 381-396, julho, 2021.
FORSEED. Catálogo de híbridos de milho 2022. Disponível em: https://www.forseedsementes.com.br/wp-
content/uploads/2020/12/Catalogo_Milho_2021-Web.pdf. Acesso 10 jan. 2024.
INSTITUTO RIO GRANDENSE DO ARROZ. La Niña, em sua terceira safra consecutiva, já provoca redução nas precipitações no
RS. Disponível em: https://irga.rs.gov.br/la-nina-em-sua-terceira-safra-consecutiva-ja-provoca-reducao-nas-precipitacoes-no-
rs#:~:text=sua%20terceira%20safra-,La%20Ni%C3%B1a%2C%20em%20sua%20terceira%20safra%20consecutiva%2C%20j%C3%A
%20provoca,redu%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20nas%20precipita%C3%A7%C3%B5es%20no%20RS&text=Se%20o%20m%C3%AAs%20de
%20agosto,mm%20(Figura%201%20A). Acesso 10 jan. 2024.
MAGALHÃES, P. C.; DURÃES, F. O. M. Fisiologia do milho. Sete Lagoas: Embrapa Milho e Sorgo, 2006. 10 p. (Embrapa Milho e
Sorgo. Circular Técnica, 76). Disponível em: https://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/490408 Acesso 10
jan. 2024.
MATZENAUER, R., WESTPHALEN, S. L., BERGAMASCHI, H. Relações entre a evapotranspiração do milho, radiação global e saldo
de radiação. Pesq. agropec. bras., Brasília, v. 17, n.7: 1051-1056, jul. 1982.
MAURI, V.; BELLAVER, M.; RICHART, A. Doses de nitrogênio aplicadas em cobertura no milho segunda safra cultivado em
Latossolo Vermelho. Cultivando o Saber. v. 13, n. 3. 2020.
NETTO, M. S. et al. Épocas, formas de aplicação e doses de nitrogênio na cultura do milho em condições de cerrado. Colloquium
Agrariae, v. 16, n. 6, p. 56–66, 2020.
OTTMAN, M. J.; WELCH, L. F. Planting patterns and radiation interception, plant nutrient concentration, and yield in corn.
Agronomy Journal, Madison, v. 81, n. 2, p. 167-174, 1989
PIAZZOLI, D. et al. Plant density and nitrogen topdressing of high-altitude main-season corn. Semina. Ciencias agrarias, v. 42, n.
, p. 2651–2668, 2021.
RITCHIE, S.W.; HANWAY, J.J.; BENSON, G.O. How a corn plant develops. Ames, Iowa State University of Science and Technology,
26p. (Special Report, 48).
SORATTO, R. et al. Fontes alternativas e doses de nitrogênio no milho safrinha em sucessão á soja. Rev. Ciênc. Agron. v. 41, n. 4,
SOUZA, J. et al.. Adubação nitrogenada na cultura do milho safrinha irrigado em plantio direto. Solos e Nutrição de Plantas,
Bragantia. v. 70. n. 2. 2011.
STEDUTO, P.; HSIAO T.; FERERES E.; RAES, D. Crop yield response to water. Rome, FAO. 505p, 2012.
STRIEDER, M. L. et al. A resposta do milho irrigado ao espaçamento entrelinhas depende do híbrido e da densidade de plantas.
Ciência Rural, v. 37, n. 3, p. 634–642, 1 jun. 2007.
TASCA, F. A. et al. Volatilização de amônia do solo após a aplicação de ureia convencional ou com inibidor de urease. Revis.
Bras. De Ciên, Do Solo, v. 35, n. 2, 493–502. - 2011.
TOLLENAAR, M.; DWER, L.M.; STEWART, D.W. Ear and kernel formation in maize hybrids respresenting three decades of grain
yield improvement in Ontario. Crop Science, Madison, v.32, n.2, p.432-438, 1992.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.