Odor dispersion in bovine confinement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X66995Keywords:
Mathematical modeling, Advection-diffusion, Odors, Case studyAbstract
Odor emissions have caused discomfort and possible damage to health in populations that living around industrial areas or animal production. The bad smell can cause effects to human health such as nausea, headaches and harm the mental health of those who live there. This work addresses a case study of a bovine confinement area in the rural part of the county of Capão do Leão, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, in which some residents have reported the constant presence of odors. Thus, using the advection-diffusion equation, we calculated the dispersion of pollutants in the atmosphere, in different meteorological conditions in order to obtain results befitting with the residents’ reports.
Downloads
References
AL-DADDOUS, A., KUMAR, P., ROBINS, A. Influence of roadside vegetation barriers on concentration of traffic-spewed ultrafine particles. In: International Conference on Harmonisation with in atmospheric dispersion modeling for regulatory purposes, 15, Madrid, Espanha, 2013.
BUSINGER, J., WYNGAARD, C., YZUMI, Y., BRADLEY, E. F., Flux-profile relationships in the atmospheric surface layer. Jornal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 28:181-189, 1974.
GONÇALVES, G., BUSKE, D., QUADROS, R., WEYMAR, G., A new approach to solve time dependent three-dimensional advection-diffusion equation applied to model air pollution dispersion in the planetary boundary layer. Int. J. DEv, Res, 8 (5): 20535-20543, 2018.
MOREIRA, D., TIRABASSI, T., Modelo matemático de dispersão de poluentes na atmosfera: um Instrumento tècnico para a gestão ambiental. Revista Ambiente e Sociedade, 7, 2004.
SHARAN, M., SING, M., YADAV, A., Simulation of short-range diffusion experiment in low-wind convective conditions. Atmospheric Environment, 36: 1901-1906, 2002.
SHARAN, M., SING, M., MONDANI, M.A mathematical model for the dispersion in low winds with eddy diffusivities as linear functions of downwind distance. Atmospheric Environment, 30: 1137-1145, 1996.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
