Numerical simulation of diffusion flames of hydrogen using Navier-Stokes equations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X66842Keywords:
Hydrogen, Diffusion Flames, Mechanism Reduced, Numerical SimulationAbstract
The demand for new sources of alternative fuels, to replace the use of fossil fuels and reduce gas emissions, hasincreased in recent years. Hydrogen has increasingly become an interesting alternative fuel as it does not producegreenhouse gas CO2and can increase fuel economy when used in hydrocarbon mixtures. In this work, a numericalsimulation was carried out for diffusion flames of hydrogen inside a rectangular burner. Therefore, Navier-Stokesreactive equations were applied, mixture fraction for the flow and for the chemical part the flamelet method. Forthe modeling of turbulence, the known technique was used as large-eddy simulation (LES), and the finite differencemethod to discretize the equations. Simplifications were also carried out in terms of the equations to reduce thecomplexity of the problem. The numerical results obtained were compared with data found in the literature.
Downloads
References
CORRÊA, L., MOMPEAN, G., KUROKAWA, F. A., SOUSA, F. S. (2018). Temporal large-eddy simulations of the lid-drivencavity by finite volume method. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 40, 1–17.
DE BORTOLI, A. L. (2009). Analitical/numerical solutionfor confined jet diffusion flame (sandia flame c). Latin AmericanApplied Research, 39, 157–163.
DE BORTOLI, A. L., ANDREIS, G. S. L., PEREIRA, F. (2015). Modeling and Simulation of Reactive Flows. Elsevier.
DOS SANTOS, F. M. S. M., DOS SANTOS, F. A. C. M. (2005). O combustivel hidrogenio. Revista Educação, Ciência eTecnologia, 31, 252–270.
FORTUNA (2000). Tecnicas computacionais para dinâmica dos fluidos: conceitos e aplicações. Edusp, São Paulo.
FOX, MCDONALD, PRITCHARD (2010). Introdução à dinâmica dosfluidos, 8o edn. LTC.
GAYDON, A. G., WOLFHARD, H. G. (1979). Flames: Their Structure, Radiation and Temperature, 4o edn. Chapman andhall.
HOERLLE, C. A., ZIMMER, L., PEREIRA, F. M. (2017). Numerical study of CO2effects on laminar non-premixed biogasflames employing a global kinetic mechanism and the flamelet-generated manifold technique. Fuel, 203, 671–685.
LABORATORIES, S. N. (1996). Proceedings of the international workshop on measurement and computation of turbulent nonpremixed flames. https://public.ca.sandia.gov/TNF/inc/TNF1_Proceedings.pdf?,acessed 20 May 2019.
LAW, C. K. (2006). Combustion Physics. Cambridge University Press, USA.
LIU, J., FUYUAN, Y., HEWU, W., MINGGAO, O. (2012). Numerical study of hydrogen addition to DME/CH4 dual fuel RCGI engine. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37, 8688–8697.
LORENZETTI, G. S., DE BORTOLI, A. L., MARCZAC, L. D. F. (2012). A numerical method for the solution of confinedco-flowing jet diffusion flames. Latin American Applied Research, 42, 27–32.
MARINOV, N. M., WESTBROOK, C. K., PITZ, W. J. (1995). Detailed and global chemical kinetics model for hydrogen. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, pp. 1–32.
PETERS, N. (1986). Laminar flamelet concepts in turbulent combustion. Twenty-First Symposium on Combustion, pp.1250–1251.
PETERS, N. (1992). Fifteen Lectures on Laminar and Turbulent Combustion. Ercoftac Summer School.
PETERS, N. (2004). Turbulent Combustion. Cambridge University Press.
PITSCH, H. (2006). Large-eddy simulation of turbulent combustion. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 38, 453–482.
POINSOT, T., VEYNANTE, D. (2001). Theoretical and Numerical Combustion. R. T. Edwards, Inc.
SCHIESTEL, R. (2008). Modeling and Simulation of Turbulent Flows. Jonh Wiley & Sons, Inc.
TURNS, S. R. (2013). An introduction to combustion, 3o edn. McGraw Hill, Boston.
VAZ, F. A., DE BORTOLI, A. L. (2014). A new reduced kinetic mechanism for turbulent jet diffusion flames of bioethanol. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 247, 918–929.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
