Luminous sequencial controlled by Bluetooth
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X35496Keywords:
Arduino, Bluetooth, LEDAbstract
The use of microcontrollers has been growing in the last years, in the development of electronic systems, due to their small dimensions and ability to control process. The application of microcontrollers is significant in several sectors, such as: industrial, domestic, entertainment, telecommunication, automotive, transport and aviation. Arduino is an electronic platform low-cost, open source, prototyping designed whit a built-in microcontroller based on easy-to-use hardware and software that can be programed to configure the inputs and outputs between the external components connected to the platform. Therefore, aiming the transformation of entertainment into a form of learning, this work presents the development of a luminous sequential programmed in C language. The system is composed by 25 LED’s strategically distributed for the visualization of the preprogrammed sequences. In the project the MEGA 2560 arduino was used and a Bluetooth module for wireless communication between the microcontroller and multifunction devices like smartphone’s, an application develop in MIT APP INVENTOR controls the systems, giving the user the ability to choose the routine besides the speed and luminous intensity of the set.
Downloads
References
EVANS, M.; NOBLE, J; HOCHENBAUM, J. Arduino em Ação. São Paulo. Novatec. 2013.
MCROBERTS, M. “Arduino Básico”. São Paulo. Novatec. 2011.
MONK, S. Programação com Arduino >>começando com sketches, Bookman Editora LTDA. Porto Alegre, RS. 2013.
MIZRAHI, V. V. Treinamento em Linguagem C. São Paulo: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2008.
SARTORI, G., MOLINA, L. A., LIMA, W. C. G. Desenvolvimento de um sistema microcontrolado de baixo custo utilizando smartphone para aplicações de automação residencial. Trabalho de conclusão de curso, Departamento Acadêmico de Eletrônica. UTFP. 2015.
SCHILDT, H. C, Completo e Total. 3 ed. São Paulo: Pearson Makron Books, 1997.
BLOG USANAINFO [Internet], O que é arduino? De onde vem? Do que se alimenta? Available from: http://blog.usinainfo.com.br/o-que-e-arduino-de-onde-vem-do-que-se-alimenta.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
