Simulating a Phasor Measurement Unit in Real Time using Typhoon Virtual HIL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X40589Keywords:
Phasor Measurement Unit, Electric Power Systems, Real time simulationsAbstract
This paper aims to present a project to implement a phasor measurement unit (PMU), which is the main component in the synchronized phasor measurement system. This measurement technology aims to bring significant gains to the operation of electrical systems, since it allows to simultaneously measure magnitudes and phase angles of voltage and current at geographically distant points from the electrical system. So, the paper reports the use of filters in obtaining PMU measurements. In this way, it is intended to implement the PMU in the Typhoon Virtual HIL software.
Downloads
References
DOBAKHSHARI, A. RANIBAR A. Application os synchronized phasor measurements to wide-area fault diagnosis and location. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, v. 8, n. 4, pp. 716-729, 2013.
EHRENSPERGER, J.G. Fasorial measurement systems: Study and Analysis of the state of the art. Dissertação, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), 2003.
IEEE. C37.118, IEEE Standard for Synchrophasors for Power Systems, 2011.
MARTINS, R.S. Presentation of the synchronized fasorial measurement system and its implantation approach in the state estimator, Dissertação - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2012.
NETO, M. S. I. TOCHETTO, A. P. ROCHA, C. R. M. Implementation of Fasorial Measurement Unit in ATP, 2014.
PHADKE, A. G. THORP, J. S. Synchronized Phasor
Measurements and Their Applications, 1° ed. Nova York, Springer, 2008.
PHADKE, A. G. THORP, J. S. Synchronized Phasor Measurements and Their Applications, 2° ed. Nova York, Springer, 2017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
