Contribuições das geociências à prática de educação ambiental em escola da área rural em Alegrete, RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X27230Abstract
The present work describes the physical aspects (geology, geomorphology and other) and of the erosive processes, based on direct observation in the field and in the topographical maps of the area localized in the west of Rio Grande do Sul state, more specifically of the municipal districtis of São Francisco of Assis, Manoel Viana and Alegrete.In consequence of erosion problms, ciliary deforestation and sediments accumulation of drainages, a climate map was elaborated, that associated to the characteristics lithological and of vegetation and other, it allowed to determine adult's areas or smaller fragility to the erosive processes.
These data together with the one of relief, drainage vegetation, as well as of use and occupation of the soil, they were plotted in an area maquette. Parallel to the physical observation of the area, they were applied questionnaires to the school community, to collect information to projects of environmental education and, to the local residents in order to diagnose the profile economical partner and main problems, as well as planting techniques, conservation of thesoil, production and use of chemical products, among others.
As final stage and principal aim of the work, lectures were supplied at the schools (one of each municipal district). The principal kinds of environmental degradation and possible solutions were approached, giving emphasis to the local problem.
Downloads
References
AZEVEDO, A.C & KAMINSKI, J. Considerações sobre os solos dos campos de areia no Rio Grande do Sul. Ciência & Ambiente, Santa Maria: UFSM, vol.1, n° 1, p. 65-70 (jul) 1990.
BARCELOS, V. H. de L. A Temática Ambiental e a Formação de Professores. Caderno de Pesquisa, n04, Santa Maria, 1997, 40 p.
CUNHA, S.B & GUERRA, A.J.T. (org ) Geomorfologia do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 1998. p. 192-220.
DE BIASI, M. A Carta Clinográfica: Os Métodos de Representação e sua Confecção. Revista do Departamento de Geografia. USP: N° 6, 1992. p. 45-60.
DIRETORIA DO SERVIÇO GEOGRÁFICO. Carta topográfica do município de Manuel Viana: DSG, folha SH. 21-X-D-IV-1, 1978. Escala 1: 50.000.
DIRETORIA DO SERVIÇO GEOGRÁFICO. Carta topográfica do Distrito de Passo Novo: DSG, folha SH. 21-X-C-VI-2, 1978. Escala 1: 50.000.
DIRETORIA DO SERVIÇO GEOGRÁFICO. Carta topográfica do município de São Francisco de Assis: DSG, folha SH. 21-X-DIV-2, 1978. Escala 1:50.000.
FENDRICH, R. O; BLADEN, N. L; AISSE, M. M & GARCIAS, C.M. Drenagem e Controle da Erosão Urbana. 3a ed. São Paulo: IBRASA. Curitiba: CHAMPAGNAT, 1991. p.15-34.
GUERRA, A T. Dicionário Geológico-Geomorfológico. IBGE, s- ed. Rio de Janeiro.
KLAMT, E & SCHNEIDER, P. Solos suscetíveis à erosão eólica e hídrica na região da Campanha do Rio Grande do Sul. Ciência & Ambiente, Santa Maria: UFSM, vol. 1, n01, p. 71-80. (jul) 1990.
MACIEL Fº, C. L. Introdução à Geologia de Engenharia. Santa Maria: UFSM, 1994. 284 p.
MARCHIORI, J.N.C. Vegetação e areais no sudoeste riograndense. Ciência & Ambiente, Santa Maria. UFSM, vol. 1, nº1, p.81-92 ( jul )1990.
MEDEIROS, E.R. Estratigrafia do Grupo São Bento na região de Santa Maria e paleocorrentes da Formação Botucatu. Porto Alegre, UFRGS-IG,1980.135p. (Dissertação de Mestrado).
MEDEIROS, E.R; ROBAINA, L.E.S . Degradação ambiental na região centro oeste do Rio Grande do Sul. Ciência & Ambiente, Santa Maria: UFSM. Vol. 1, nº1, p.53-64 ( jul )1990.
MENDONÇA, F.A. Geografia e meio ambiente. São Paulo: Contexto, 1993.(coleção caminhos da geografia)p.55-74.
NOVA ESCOLA, A Revista do Ensino Fundamental, PCN. Base para Debater Questões Ambientais. ANO XIV N° 125- Setembro, 1999 p. 35.
REIGOTA, M. Meio Ambiente e Representação Social. Questões da Nossa Época, ed, 41, São Paulo: Cortez, 1995, p. 87.
RODRIGUES, R. R & LEITÃO Fº, H. F. Matas Ciliares: Conservação e Recuperação. São Paulo: USP: Fapesp, 2000. p 33-44.
SUERTEGARAY, D.M.A Deserto Grande do Sul: Controvérsia. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: UFRGS, 1998.
VEIGA, P; MEDEIROS, E, R. Gênese dos Campos de Areia no Município de Quaraí-RS In Anais do I Congresso da Associação Brasileira de Estudos do Quaternário. Porto Alegre: UFRGS, 1987.
VIEIRA, E. F. Rio Grande do Sul: Geografia física e vegetação Porto Alegre: Sagra, 1984. 184p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.