ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC POLICIES IMPLEMENTED FOR WATER MANAGEMENT IN BRAZIL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X21896Keywords:
Water resources. Public policy. Public management.Abstract
Although the planet is covered by 70% water, poor distribution of this mineral causes some areas of the globe suffer from its lack. Even Brazil being privileged with 13% of freshwater around the planet, it was necessary the creation and implementation of laws for its preservation. This article aims to present the history of Brazilian legislation related to Water Management, since its inception to the current period. According to the bibliography, it is clear that concern for water resources in Brazil was initially for navigation and agriculture. From the year 1934, the Water Code went on to encourage the industrial use of water resources, defining water as a public good, common or private use. Only with the implementation of Law 9,433 / 1997, called the National Water Resources Policy (PNRH) is what happened to give more importance to sustainable water management, with satisfactory quality standards for the various types of use. In 2000 it was created the National Water Agency (Law 9984), which has as main features the disciplinary implementation, operation, control and evaluation of management instruments created by PNRH.Downloads
References
ALMEIDA, C. C. de. (2002) Evolução Histórica da Proteção Jurídica das Águas no Brasil. Revista Jus Navigandi, Teresina, ano 7, n. 60, 1ºnov. 2002. Disponível em: <http://jus.com.br/artigos/3421>. Acessado em 17/09/2015.
ANA (AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE ÁGUAS). O Comitê de Bacia Hidrográfica, Prática e Procedimento, 2011. Volume 2. Disponível em:< http://capacitacao.ana.gov.br/Lists/Cursos_Anexos/Attachments/90/miolo_comite2_final.pdf> Acessado em: 30/08/2015.
ANA (AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE ÁGUAS). Programa despoluição de Bacias Hidrográficas – PRODES. Disponível em: <http://www.ana.gov.br/prodes/prodes.asp>. Acessado em: 02/08/2015.
ANA (AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE ÁGUAS). Programa despoluição de Bacias Hidrográficas – PRODES. Disponível em:< http://www2.ana.gov.br/Paginas/projetos/ProgramaProdutorAgua.aspx>. Acessado em: 02/08/2015.
ANA (AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE ÁGUAS). Programa despoluição de Bacias Hidrográficas – PRODES. Disponível em:< http://www2.ana.gov.br/Paginas/projetos/QualidadeAgua.aspx>. Acessado em: 02/08/2015.
ANA (AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE ÁGUAS). Programa despoluição de Bacias Hidrográficas – PRODES. Disponível em:< http://www2.ana.gov.br/Paginas/institucional/SobreaAna/Default.aspx>. Acessado em: 02/08/2015.
ANA (AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE ÁGUAS). Conjuntura dos Recursos Hídricos no Brasil, 2013. Disponível em: <http://arquivos.ana.gov.br/institucional/spr/conjuntura/webSite_relatorioConjuntura/projeto/index.html>. Acessado em 15/10/2015.
ANTUNES, P. de B. (2002) Direito Ambiental. 6ª Ed. Rio de Janeiro: Lúmen Júris, 2002, 902p.
BRAGA, B.; REBOUÇAS, A. C. Águas Doces no Brasil. Capital ecológico, uso e conservação. São Paulo:Escrituras, 2002, 703p.
BRASIL, Lei 6.938/1981. Disponível em: <http://www.planalto.gov.br/Ccivil_03/Leis/L6938.htm>. Acessado em: 22/09/2015.
BRASIL. Presidência da República Federativa do Brasil. Constituição dos Estados Unidos do Brasil (19 de julho de 1934). Disponível em:
<http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/Constituicao34.htm>. Acessado em 15/08/2015.
BRASIL. Presidência da República Federativa do Brasil. Constituição dos Estados Unidos do Brasil (10 de novembro de 1937). Disponível em: <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Constituicao/Constituicao37.htm>. Acessado em 14/08/2015.
BRASIL. Presidência da República Federativa do Brasil. Decreto-Lei nº 7.841/1945. Disponível em:< http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Decreto-Lei/1937-1946/Del7841.htm>. Acessado em 01/08/2015.
BRASIL. Presidência da República Federativa do Brasil. Decreto-Lei nº 2.612/1998. Disponível em:< http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto/D2612.htm>. Acessado em 30/08/2015.
FARIAS, T. (2009) Introdução ao Direito Ambiental. Belo Horizonte: Del Rey, 2009.
GRANZIEIRA, M. L. M. Direito de Águas e Meio Ambiente. São Paulo: Ícone, 1993. 136p.
HENKES, S. L. (2004) Histórico Legal e Institucional dos Recursos Hídricos no Brasil. Disponível em: <http://www1.jus.com.br/doutrina/texto.asp?id=4146>. 2004. Acessado em: 24/09/2015.
KETTELHUT, J.T. S. et. al. (1999) Aspectos Legais, Institucionais e Gerenciais. In: O Estado das Águas no Brasil. Brasília: ANEEL e ANA, 1.999.
MACHADO. Paulo Affonso Leme. Recursos Hídricos – Direito Brasileiro e Internacional. Malheiros Editores: São Paulo, 2002.
NOGUEIRA, R. Água: A Luta do Século. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Sol, 2006.
POMPEU, C. T. Direito de Águas no Brasil. 2 ed. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2010.
POMPEU, C. T. Regime Jurídico da Política das Águas Públicas. São Paulo: CETESB, 1976.
REBOUÇAS, A. C. Água Doce no Mundo e no Brasil. In: REBOUÇAS, A. C. et al. (orgs) Águas Doces no Brasil – Capital Ecológico, Uso e Conservação. São Paulo: Escrituras, 2002. 2ª Ed. Revisada e Ampliada.
SANTOS, Thereza Christina Carvalho e CÂMARA, João Batista Drummond (Orgs.). GEO Brasil 2002 – Perspectivas do Meio Ambiente no Brasil. Brasília: Edições IBAMA, 2002.
VARGAS, Everton Vieira. Água e Relações Internacionais. In Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 2000, Volume 43, nº 001. Brasília, Brasil. Disponível em: <http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/redalyc/pdf/358/35843110.pdf>. Acessado em 22/09/2015.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
