DIRECT DEMOCRACY AND THE PROTECTION OF THE MINORITY RIGHTS: OBSERVATIONS ON THE THESIS OF THE TYRANNY OF THE MAJORITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/1981369429144Keywords:
Conservative Populism, Direct Democracy, Minorities, Popular Participation.Abstract
This article tackles the topic of direct democracy and the discussion of its dysfunctional use reflected on the attack on the rights of social minorities. The popular initiatives and consultations often aim to block or neutralize the security of rights to groups of the society such as indigenous people (or native people), immigrants, women, racial minorities, homosexuals, etc. In this way, it is argued that the risk of popular manifestation may culminate in the tyranny of the majority. In face of this scenario, it would thus be possible to advocate against the instruments of direct participation. It is argued in this article that the tyranny of the majority is not an inherent element to the institutes of direct participation and that the understanding of this phenomenon demands an analysis of the social, political and institutional normative contexts. In order to substantiate such perspective, it will be employed several facts and analysis related to the application of the institutes of direct democracy in the United States and Switzerland. Finally, it is concluded that the mechanisms of direct democracy must be developed within a certain legal framework in order to potentialize the participation of citizens in the control of the power or to hinder the presentation of conservative populist themes to the direct popular decision.
Downloads
References
ALTMAN, David. Democracia directa en el continente americano: ¿autolegitimación gubernamental o censura ciudadana? Política y gobierno, v. XII, n. 2, p. 203-232, 2005.
ALTMAN, David. Direct democracy worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
BALLOUSSIER, Anna Virginia. Maconha, cassinos e sacolas serão temas de voto nos EUA em novembro. Folha de S.Paulo, São Paulo, 14 ago. 2016. Folha Mundo. Disponível em: http://m.folha.uol.com.br/mundo/2016/08/1802769-maconha-cassinos-e-sacolas-serao-temas-de-voto-nos-eua-em-novembro.shtml?cmpid=
facefolha. Acesso em: 22 ago. 2016.
BARBER, Benjamin R. Strong democracy. Participation politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003.
BAUMAN, Zygmunt. Tempos líquidos. Tradução de Carlos Alberto Medeiros. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2007.
BELL JR., Derrick A. The referendum: democracy’s barrier to racial equality. Washington Law Review, v. 54, n. 1, p. 01-29, 1978. Disponível em: http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/washlr54&div=9&id=&page=. Acesso em: 28 jan. 2017.
BOBBIO, Norberto. Liberalismo e democracia. Tradução de Marco Aurélio Nogueira. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 2007.
BOURDIEU, Pierre. O mistério do mistério. Das vontades particulares à “vontade geral”. In: CANÊDO, Letícia Bicalho (Org.). O sufrágio universal e a invenção democrática. São Paulo: Estação Liberdade, 2005.
BOWLER, Shaun; GLAZER, Amihai. Hybrid democracy and its consequences. In: BOWLER, Shaun; GLAZER, Amihai (Eds.). Direct democracy’s impact on American political institutions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
BUCHANAN, James M. Direct democracy, classical liberalism and constitutional strategy. Kyklos, v. 54, fasc. 2-3, p. 235-242, 2001. Disponível em: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-6435.00151/epdf. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2016.
CHEMERINSKY, Erwin. Challenging direct democracy. Michigan State Law Review, v. 293-306, p. 296-297, 2007. Disponível em: http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2480&context=faculty_scholarship. Acesso em: 17 mar. 2017.
CORREIO BRAZILIENSE. Advogado da Califórnia propõe lei para punir homossexuais com pena de morte. Brasília, 03 mar. 2015. Disponível em: http://www.correiobraziliense.com.br/app/outros/ultimasnoticias/63,37,63,10/2015/03/03/interna_mundo,473786/advogado-da-california-propoe-lei-que-proibe-homossexuais-sob-pena-de-morte.shtml. Acesso em: 10 dez. 2016.
CRONIN, E. Thomas. Direct democracy. The politics of initiative, referendum, and recall. Harvard University Press, 1999.
DIAZ, Elias. Estado de direito e sociedade democrática: o que é o Estado de Direito. Tradução de António Guimarães. Lisboa: Iniciativas Editoriais, 1972.
EULE, Julian N. Judicial review of direct democracy. The Yale Law Journal, v. 99, n. 7, May 1990, p. 1.503-1590. Disponível em: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/
pdf. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2017.
FUENTES-ROHWER, Luís. The emptiness of majority rule. Michigan Journal of Race and Law, v. 1, p. 195-260. Disponível em: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?
handle=hein.journals/mjrl1&div=1&start_page=195&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=6&men_tab=srchresults. Acesso em: 24 ago. 2016.
GARCÍA, Eloy; CASTRO, José Luis Cascajo; ARAUJO, Joan Oliver; MURO, Ignacio Torres. Encuesta sobre el referéndum. UNED. Teoría y Realidad Constitucional, n. 30, p. 25, 2012. Disponível em: http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/TRC/issue/
view/514. Acesso em: 18 jul. 2017.
GOW, James Iain. Les effets pervers d’une bonne idée: la démocratie directe en Californie. Politique et Sociétés, v. 17, n. 1-2, p. 239-271, 1998. Disponível em: http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/040107ar. Acesso em: 10 dez. 2016.
KELSEN, Hans. Teoria geral do direito e do Estado. Tradução de Luís Carlos Borges. 4. ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2005.
KIRCHGÄSSNER, Gebhard. Direct democracy: obstacle to reform? Constitutional Political Economy, v. 19, n. 2, p. 81-93, June 2008. Disponível em: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10602-008-9039-3#page-2. Acesso em: 25 jan. 2017.
LEDUC, Lawrence. The politics of direct democracy. Referendum in global perspective. Toronto: Broadview press, 2003.
LEIB, Ethan J. Can direct democracy be made deliberative? Buffalo Law Review, v. 54, p. 903-925, 2006. Disponível em: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1079&context=faculty_scholarship. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2016.
LEWIS, Daniel C. Direct democracy and minority rights. A critical assessment of the tyranny of the majority in the American states. New York: Routledge, 2013.
LIJPHART, Arend. Modelos de democracia. Formas de gobierno y resultados en treinta y seis países. Tradução de Carme Castellnou. Barcelona: Ariel, 2008.
LINERA, Miguel Ángel Presno. La democracia directa y la falacia de sus riesgos. In: GUTIÉRREZ, Ignacio Gutiérrez (Coord.). La democracia indignada: tensiones entre voluntad popular y representación política. Granada: Comares, 2014.
MOECKLI, Daniel. Of minarets and foreign criminals: Swiss direct democracy and human rights. Human Rights Law Review, v. 11, n. 4, p. 01, Dec. 2011. Disponível em: http://www.zora.uzh.ch/51466/1/Moeckli_Human_Rights_Law_Review_
_2011.pdf. Acesso em: 20 dez. 2016.
MORALES, Angel Garrorena. Teoria y práctica española del referéndum. Anales de la Universidad de Murcia, Derecho, v. XXXI, n. 3-4, p. 79-108, 1977.
MOREL, Laurence. Le référendum: état des recherches. Revue Française de Science Politique, v. 42, n. 5, p. 835-864, 1992. Disponível em: http://persee.fr/web/
revues/home/prescript/article/rfsp_0035-2950_1992_num_42_5_404346. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2017.
MUELLER, Dennis. C. Constitutional democracy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
OSTROGORSKI, Moisei. La democracia y los partidos políticos. Tradução de Antonio Lastra e Andrés Alonso Martos. Madrid: Editorial Trotta, 2008.
PAPADOPOULOS, Yannis. Citizenship through direct democracy? The “broken promises” of empowerment. In: CROUCH, Colin; EDER, Klaus; TAMBINI, Damian (Eds.). Citizenship, markets and the state. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
PISARELLO, Gerardo. Procesos constituyentes: caminos para la ruptura democrática. Madri: Editorial Trotta, 2014.
SARTORI, Giovanni. Homo videns: televisão e pós-pensamento. Tradução de Antonio Angonese. São Paulo: Edusc, 2001.
TOCQUEVILLE, Alexis de. La democracia en América. Tradução de Luis R. Cuéllar. 2. ed. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2002.
TOLBERT, Caroline J. Direct democracy and institutional realignment in the American States. Political Science Quarterly, v. 118, n. 3, p. 467-489, 2003. Disponível em: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30035784.pdf?_=1471939053488&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents. Acesso em: 22 ago. 2016.
WAGSCHAL, Uwe. Direct democracy and public policymaking. Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, v. 17, n. 2, p. 223-245, May-Aug. 1997. Disponível em: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4007611. Acesso em: 17 jan. 2017.
ZAYAT, Demián. Mecanismos de participación ciudadana. In: GARGARELLA, Roberto (Coord.). La Constitución en 2020. 48 propuestas para una sociedad igualitaria. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno, 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.
