Reflexivities and Social Research: the dialogic production of reality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/1984644467093Keywords:
Reflexivities, Social research, Social reality.Abstract
During the interview, we aim to problematize issues pertinent to social research with/about childhood and youths, highlighting the reflexive processes that constitute contemporary social actions. Thus, we invite Enzo Colombo for a conversation about the different theoretical-methodological perspectives that bring up the theme of “reflexivity”, considering it a category of interpretation in view of the current processes of socialization and individuation. The contributions raised by Enzo Colombo answers emerge from epistemological criticisms and didactically outline interpretative perspectives of the reflexive action, namely: a) the reflection of the social actor on him/herself and the context, interacting with codes and activities; b) the recursive process of incorporating results from action and knowledge; and c) the relational practice of producing senses and action in the interaction. Therefore, he continues his arguments to discuss the socio-political conditions to produce a ‘construcionist reflexivity’, held to the contexts and dialogues between the subjects, aware to the research participation in the construction of social reality.
References
AGAMBEN, Giorgio. Lo stato di eccezione. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 2003.
ANDERSON, Elizabeth. ‘Feminist, Epistemology and Philosophy of Science’. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edward N. Zalta (ed.), 2020. Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/feminism-epistemology/.
ARENDT, H. A condição humana. Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária, 2010.
ASHMORE, Malcolm. The reflexive thesis: writing sociology of scientific knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1989.
ATKINSON, Will. Class, individualization and late modernity: in search of the reflexive worker. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2010.
BAKHTIN, Mikhail Mikhaĭlovich. The dialogic imagination: four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.
BAKHTIN, Mikhail Mikhaĭlovich. L’autore e l’eroe. Torino: Einaudi, 2000.
BAUMAN, Zygmunt. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000.
BECK, Ulrich. Risk Society. London: Sage, 1992.
BECK, Ulrich. The Metamorphosis of the World. Cambridge: Polity, 2016.
BECK, Ulrich; BECK-GERNSCHEIM, Elisabeth. Individualization. London: Sage, 2001.
BECK, Ulrich; GIDDENS, Anthony; LASH, Scott. Reflexive modernization. Stanfort University Press, 1994.
BIELER, Patrick; BISTER, Milena D.; HAUER, Janine; KLAUSNER, Martina; NIEWÖHNER, Jörg; SCHMID, Christine; VON PETER, Sebastian. Distributing Reflexivity through Co-laborative Ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 50 (1), p. 77-98, 2012.
BOLTANSKI, Luc. De la critique. Paris: Gallimard, 2009.
BOURDIEU, Pierre. Ce que parler veut dire: l’économie des changes linguistiques. Paris: Fayard, 1982.
BOURDIEU, Pierre. Science de la science et réflexivité - Cours du Collège de France 2001. Paris: Raisons d’agir, 2001.
BOURDIEU, Pierre; WACQUANT, Loïc. Réponse. Pour une anthropologie réflexive. Paris: Edition du Seuil, 1992.
BRÖCKLING, Ulrich. The entrepreneurial self: fabricating a new type of subject, London: Sage, 2016.
COLLINS, Patricia Hill. Intersectionality's definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, p. 1–20, 2015.
COLOMBO, Enzo. Verso una riflessività etica e collettiva. Animazione sociale, 33 (5), p. 11-20, 2003.
COLOMBO, Enzo. Reflexividade e escrita sociológica. Educação, 41 (1), p. 15-26, 2016.
COLOMBO, Enzo; NAVARINI, Gianmarco. Confini dentro la città. Milano: Guerini, 1999.
CRENSHOW, Kimberle. Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43, p. 1241-1299, 1991.
DU GAY, Paul. Organizing identity: entrepreneurial governance and public management. In: HALL, Stuart; DU GAY, Paul. (eds.). Questions of cultural identity. London: Sage, 1996, p. 151-169.
ERICKSON, Ken; STULL, Donald. Doing team ethnography: warnings and advices. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1998.
FAOUBAR, Mohamed. Inégalités et pluralité de l’action chez Bernard Lahire: retour réflexif sur un savoir sociologique contemporain. SociologieS (online), 2015. Disponível em: http://journals.openedition.org/sociologies/5152.
FORTUN, Kim. Advocacy after Bhopal: environmentalism, disaster, new global orders. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
GARFINKEL, Harold. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1967.
GIDDENS, Anthony. The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990.
GOULDNER, Alvin W. The coming crisis of Western Sociology. New York: Basic Books, 1970.
HARAWAY, Donna. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14 (3), p. 575-599, 1988.
HARAWAY, Donna. Simians, cyborgs and women: the reinvention of nature. London: Free Association Books, 1991.
HARDING, Sandra. (ed.) Feminism and methodology: social science issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987.
HOOKS, Bell. Yearning: race, gender and cultural politics. London: Turnaround, 1991.
LAHIRE, Bernard. L’Esprit sociologique. Paris: Éditions La Découverte/Poche, 2007.
LIPOVETSKY, Gilles; SERROY, Jean. L’Esthétization du mond: vivre à l’age du capitalism artiste. Paris: Folio, 2016.
LYNCH, Michael. Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society, 17 (3), p. 26-54, 2000.
MANNHEIM, Karl. The Problem of Generations. In: MANNHEIM, Karl. Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd, 1952.
MEAD, George Herbert. Mind, self and society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1934.
MELUCCI, Alberto. Verso una sociologia riflessiva. Bologna: Il Mulino, 1998.
MELUCCI, Alberto. The playing self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
MILL, John Stuart. System of logic. Cambridge University Press, 2012 [1843]. Disponível em: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/system-of-logic-ratiocinative-and-inductive/290C43FBA4DC7022540D58E7EC49B1C2#fndtn-contents
MORLEY, Christine. Critical reflexivity and social work practice. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, vol. 5, p. 281-286, 2015.
PAOLUCCI, Gabriella. Introduzione a Bourdieu. Roma-Bari: Laterza, 2011.
PELS, Dick. Reflexivity: One step up. Theory, Culture & Society, 17 (3), p. 1-25, 2000.
POLLNER, Melvin. Left of ethnomethodology. American Sociological Review, 56, p. 370-380, 1991.
RAWLS, John. Justice as fairness. A Restatement. Cambridge MA: Belknap, 2001.
SALZMAN, Philip Carl. On reflexivity, American Anthropologist, 104 (3), p. 805–813, 2002.
SWEET, Paige L. Reflexivity in feminist standpoint: theory and Bourdieu. Gender & Society, 34 (6), p. 922-950, 2020.
WACQUANT, Loïc. Introduction. In : BOURDIEU, Pierre; WACQUANT, Loïc. Réponse. Pour une anthropologie reflexive. Paris: Edition du Seuil, 1992, p. 08-37.
WEBER, Max. Die «Objektivität» sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 19, p 22-87, 1904 [traduzione italiana, 1958].
WEBER, Max. Wissenschaft als Beruf. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1919.
WOOLGAR, Steve. Knowledge and reflexivity: new frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge. Sage: London, 1988.
WRIGHT MILLS, Charles. The sociological imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Declaration of originality
We declare that all articles present in the journal Educação (UFSM) are originals and were not submitted for publishing on any other publication, as a whole or a fraction. We also declare that, after being published by Educação (UFSM), a paper will not be submitted to another journal within two years. After this time, our journal transfers the publishing rights to the authors, with a permit granted by the Editorial Council.
We also acknowledge that the originals’ submission to Educação (UFSM) implies on a transference of copyright for physical and digital publishing to the journal. In case of noncompliance, the violator will receive sanctions and penalties predicted by the Brazilian Copyright Protection Law (n. 9610, dated 19/02/98).
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
This license lets others remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, and copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
