Social interactions, communication and development of rural family farmers

Authors

  • Carlos Enrique de Medeiros Jeronimo Universidade Potiguar, Mossoró, RN
  • Ana Beatriz Alves de Araújo Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Mossoró, RN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/223613088910

Keywords:

Social Interactions, Communication, Family Farming, Network Xique Xique

Abstract

This article examines the social interactions and the development of family farmers from the perspective of contributions that the communication process can bring to development, where the theoretical background is the main communication for social change. The research is based on data collected on the Web Xique Xique. One of the objectives proposed is whether, over time, the community would be strengthened between farmers or whether, instead, there would be a tendency to individualization. Another objective is to identify whether extension and union representatives are integrated into the network of relationships of producers sitting. It starts with the hypothesis that there is a consistent network of social interactions that includes actors from various sectors of local society and also that family farmers have advanced in the process of emancipation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Carlos Enrique de Medeiros Jeronimo, Universidade Potiguar, Mossoró, RN

Doutorado em Engenharia Quimica. Engenheiro de Processamento de Petroleo da Petrobras.

Ana Beatriz Alves de Araújo, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Mossoró, RN

Graduação em Comunicação Social pela Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte, mestranda do Programa de Pós-graduação em Ambiente, Tecnologia e Sociedade da Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido.

References

ABRAMOVAY, Ricardo. Paradigmas do capitalismo agrário em questão. São Paulo. Hucitec, 1992.

ALMEIDA, Jalcione. Da ideologia do progresso à idéia de desenvolvimento rural sustentável. Porto Alegre: UFRGS, 1997. p. 33-55.

BELTRÁN SALMON, Luis Ramiro. El pensamiento latinoamericano sobre comunicación democrática. In: Tendencias’2007 - Medios de Comunicación: El Escenario Iberoamericano. Colección Fundación Telefónica, 2007. p. 275-289. Disponível em: http://www.infoamerica.org/primera/anuario_medios.pdf. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2013.

BORDENAVE, Juan Díaz. O que é participação? São Paulo, 1995.

COSTA, Marisa Vorraber; SILVEIRA, Rosa Hessel; SOMMER, Luis Henrique. Estudos culturais, educação e pedagogia. Revista Brasileira de Educação, Rio de Janeiro, n. 23, 2003. p. 36-61. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbedu/n23/n23a03.pdf. Acesso em: 5 abr. 2013.

FÍGARO PAULINO, Roseli; BACCEGA, Maria Aparecida. Sujeito, comunicação e cultura (entrevista com Jesús Martín-Barbero). Comunicação & Educação, São Paulo, n. 15, p. 62 a 80, maio/ago. de 1999. Disponível em: http://www.eca.usp.br/comueduc/artigos/15_62-80_05-08_1999-9.html. Acesso em: 4 abr. 2013.

KAGEYAMA, Angela A. Desenvolvimento rural: conceitos e aplicação ao caso brasileiro. Porto Alegre, 2008.

MARQUES DE MELO, José. Comunicação na América Latina: a conjuntura pós-desenvolvimentista. Campinas: Papirus, 1989. p. 13-38. 4 abr. 2013.

PONCHIO, Ana Paula. Comunicação e desenvolvimento de agricultores familiares de Teodoro Sampaio-SP. Campinas, SP. 2011.

PERUZZO, Cicilia M. Krohling. Comunicação comunitária e educação para a cidadania. PCLA. Pensamento Comunicacional Latino Americano (Online), São Paulo, v. 4, n. 1, p. 1-10, 2002. Disponível em: http://www2.metodista.br/unesco/PCLA/revista13/artigos% 2013-3.htm. Acesso em: 4 abri. 2013.

SCHNEIDER, Sergio, TARTARUGA, Ivan G. Peyré. Do território geográfico à abordagem territorial do desenvolvimento rural. Trabalho apresentado nas Jornadas de intercambio y discusión: el desarrollo Rural en su perspectiva institucional y territorial. Buenos Aires: FLACSO – Argentina –Universidad de Buenos Aires/CONICET, 2005.

SEN, Amartya. Desenvolvimento como liberdade. Tradução de Laura Teixeira Motta. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2000. 175 p.

TRIGUEIRO, Osvaldo. O estudo científico da comunicação: avanços teóricos e metodológicos ensejados pela escola Latino-Americana. PCLAPensamento Comunicacional Latino-Americano. v. 2, n. 2, jan./fev./mar. 2001. Disponível em: http://www2.metodista.br//unesco/PCLA/revista6/artigo%206-3.htm#22. Acesso em: 4 abr. 2013.

VEIGA, J. E. O desenvolvimento agrícola: uma visão histórica. São Paulo: HUCITEC, 1991.

WANDERLEY, Maria de Nazareth Baudel. O “lugar” dos rurais: o meio rural no Brasil moderno. In: ______ Anais do XXXV Congresso Brasileiro de Economia e Sociologia Rural. Brasília: SOBER, 2001.

WANDERLEY, Maria de Nazareth Baudel. O mundo rural como um espaço de vida: reflexões

sobre a propriedade da terra, agricultura familiar e ruralidade. Porto Alegre: Editora da UFRGS, 2009.

p.

Downloads

Published

2013-08-30

How to Cite

Jeronimo, C. E. de M., & Araújo, A. B. A. de. (2013). Social interactions, communication and development of rural family farmers. Monografias Ambientais, 12(12), 2726–2733. https://doi.org/10.5902/223613088910

Issue

REMOA, V. 12, N. 12, MAIO-AGO., 2013

Section

ARTICLES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Most read articles by the same author(s)