Storage units of nature: diagnostic Program State Storage Units-PSSU in the state of Rio Grande do Norte-Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613087680Keywords:
Protected Areas, Environmental Management, SNUC, The State Program of Conservation-PSSUAbstract
The deployment of Conservation of Nature in Rio Grande do Norte / Brazil, under state responsibility, competence is the Institute of Sustainable Development and Environment-IDEMA. This research develops a preliminary study to evaluate management in these protected areas. The method used was RAPPAM (Rapid Assessment and Prioritization of Protected Areas Management) pela.WWF developed and used in several states in Brazil. Data collection presented two biases: adirect form of questionnaires to managers and employees of two conservation units. The analysiswas indirect documentary of laws with definitions and standards applied in different UCs. The aimwas to relate the implementation of the State Program of Conservation - PEUC andrecommendations of the National System of Conservation Units-SNUC and other documents onPAs defining a preliminary diagnosis of the current status of Conservation Units established by thestate government. As a result relates to the UCs established with the objectives for which theywere created and the improvements that showed the region where they are located. Thisassessment by analyzing the theoretical guidelines and management of PAs, noted the currentstatus of state UCs. It is addressed aspects politico-institutional, administrative and land andrelations with the local population. As preliminary answers can be observed that the managementof these territories legally protected, is being implemented satisfactorily. Already anthropicpressure and lack of priority for biodiversity conservation of natural resources, both thegovernment and the population, prevents management aligning conservationism andsustainability. A number already quite worrying starts by the number of UC state created.
Downloads
References
BRASIL. MINISTÉRIO DO MEIO AMBIENTE. Agenda 21 Brasileira: Resultado da Consulta Nacional. Brasília: MMA/PNUD,
____. Agenda 21 Brasileira: Ações Prioritárias. Brasília: MMA/PNUD, 2002.
QUEIROZ, Fábio Albergaria. Meio ambiente e comércio internacional: relação sustentável ou opostos inconciliáveis? 2003. Dissertação (Mestrado em Desenvolvimento Sustentável).
BRASIL, Centro de Desenvolvimento Sustentável (CDS), Universidade de Brasília, Brasília. BRASIL, 1988. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil, Senado Federal, Centro Gráfico, Brasília, 1988, 292 p.
BRASIL, 2000. Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação da Natureza – SNUC: Lei nº 9.985, de 18 de julho de2000. Brasília: MMA/SBF, 2000. p.32. Ementa.
ERVIN, J. Metodologia do WWF para avaliação rápida e a priorização do manejo de unidades de conservação (Rappam). São Paulo, SP, WWF-Brasil. 2003(a). 70 p. (Tradução WWF-Brasil).
IBAMA. Ecossistemas Brasileiros. Moacyr Bueno Arruda (org.). Brasília: Edições IBAMA, 2001.49 p.
IDEMA. Estudos técnicos e caracterização preliminar das áreas potenciais para criação de novas unidades de conservação no estado do Rio Grande do Norte. Edições do IDEMA, 2011.
LIMA, L. E. C., 1989. Considerações Ecológicas sobre O Vale do Paraíba do Sul, Centro Educacional Objetivo, São Paulo e Fundação Nacional do Tropeirismo, Caçapava, 46 p.
MILLER, K. R. Evolução do Conceito de Áreas de Proteção – Oportunidade para o Século XXI. In: Congresso Brasileiro de Unidades de Conservação, Curitiba, 1997.
SOAVINSKI. R. J. Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação: Legislação e Política. In: XXX Congresso Brasileiro de Unidades de Conservação, Curitiba, 1997.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
