Análise da implementação da política municipal de educação ambiental no município de Natal/RN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613087653Keywords:
Environmental Education, Environmental Politics, Popular ParticipationAbstract
The overall goal of this research is to analyze the implementation of the Common Municipal Environmental Education in the city of Natal / RN (PMEAN). To achieve this goal it was necessary to identify the activities, actions, procedures, techniques, mechanisms for popular participation and financial contributions that are being used by the managers of the policy, to engage individuals and the collectivity of the scenarios of formal and non-formal about environmental education. The methodology used to analyze the strategies of implementation of the policy in question was to consult the literature on the subject, the research sites on scientific articles related to the topic, the examination of documents, practical experiences, instances of dialogue and agreement policies, programs, projects, plans, political and pedagogical; applying qualitative approach with open questionnaires on thematic context. The target of this investigation was municipal managers of Municipal and Environmental Education, elementary school teachers from public and private schools of the city of Natal, students of these schools and residents of communities the space Natal city. To obtain the results of this research was considered the validation and effectiveness of implementation strategies of PMEAN. For this reason, the study of the elements was investigated as parameters established by Law 9795/99, the National Environmental Education Politics in Brazil.Downloads
References
BRASIL. Constituição. CONSTITUIÇÃO DA REPÚBLICA DO BRASIL: texto constitucional promulgado em 5 de outubro de 1988, com alterações adotadas pelas emendas constitucionais. Brasília: Subsecretaria de Edições Técnicas, 2007.
BRASIL, LEI DE DIRETRIZES E BASES DA EDUCAÇÃO NACIONAL. lei 9394/1996 de 20 de dezembro.
BRASIL. LEI 9795/1999 DE 27 DE ABRIL: Brasília: Diário Oficial, 28/04/1999.
CASTRO, SPAZZIANI, SANTOS. Universidade, meio ambiente e parâmetros curriculares nacionais. In: Sociedade e meio Ambiente: A educação em debate; 4ª. ed. – São Paulo:Cortez, 2006.
BRASIL. MINISTÉRIO DO MEIO AMBIENTE. Secretaria de Articulação Institucional e Cidadania Ambiental Departamento de Educação Ambiental. Os Diferentes Matizes da Educação Ambiental no Brasil;1997-2007. Brasília, DF:MMA, 2008. (Série Desafios da Educação Ambiental). 290 p.; Texto: Silvia Czapski.
DIAS, Genebaldo Freire. OS QUINZE ANOS DA EDUCAÇÃO AMBIENTAL NO BRASIL: um depoimento; Brasília, v. 10, n. 49, jan./mar. 1991. In: Em Aberto.
FERREIRA, Leila da Costa. A política ambiental no Brasil. In: População, meio ambiente e desenvolvimento: Verdades e contradições; 2ª. ed. – Campinas: Unicamp, 1996.
FREIRE, P. Pedagogia do oprimido. 47ª. ed. – Rio de Janeiro: Paz e terra, 2008.
GADOTTI, Moacir. Educar para a sustentabilidade: uma contribuição a década da educação para o desenvolvimento sustentável. São Paulo: editora e livraria Paulo freire, 2009.
GIL, A. C. Métodos e técnicas de Pesquisa Social. 4ª. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 1994, p. 207.
JUNIOR, MENDONÇA, SORRENTINO, TRAJBER. Educação ambiental como política pública. São Paulo, v. 31, n. 2, p. 285-299, maio/ago. 2005. In: Educação e Pesquisa.
LAYRARGUES, Philipe Pomier. Educação para a gestão ambiental: a cidadania no enfrentamento político dos conflitos socioambientais. In: Sociedade e meio ambiente: a educação ambiental em debate; 4ª. Ed. – São Paulo: Cortez, 2006.
LEFF, E. Saber ambiental. 4ª. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2001.
____,__. Epistemologia ambiental. 3ª. ed. – São Paulo: Cortez, 2002.
____,__. A complexidade ambiental (coord.). – São Paulo: Cortez, 2003.
LOUREIRO, Carlos Frederico B.. TRAJETÓRIAS E FUNDAMENTOS DA EDUCAÇÃO AMBIENTAL. 3ª São Paulo: Cortez, 2009.
MEDINA, N. M. e SANTOS, E.C, Educação Ambiental: Uma metodologia participativa de formação. Petrópolis, Vozes, 2001.
MINAYO, M.C. e DESLANDES, S.F. Caminhos do pensamento: epistemologia e método. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz, 2002.
REIS, Marília Freitas De Campos Tozoni -. EDUCAÇÃO AMBIENTAL: natureza razão e história. 2ª Ed. Campinas, São Paulo: Autores Associados, 2008.
RIO BRANDE DO NORTE. LEI 0280/2009 DE 14 DE JULHO DE 2009: Natal: Diário Oficial, 16/04/2009.
SAITO, C. H. Política nacional de educação ambiental e construção da cidadania:Desafios contemporâneos. In: Educação Ambiental: Abordagens Múltiplas. Porto alegre: Artmed, 2002.
SANTOS, Elizabeth da Conceição et al. (Ed.). Educação Ambiental: Universidade do Estado do Amazonas. Manaus: Uea Edições, 2007.
SILVA, Aguinaldo Salomão. EDUCAÇÃO AMBIENTAL: ASPECTOS TEÓRICOS-CONCEITUAIS, LEGAIS E METODOLÓGICOS. Juiz de Fora, v. 1, n. 2, p. 45-61, 2. sem. 2008. In: Educação em Destaque.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
