Extensão e prática social: experiência com oficinas de sustentabilidade em escola rural
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613087154Keywords:
Extension, Sustainability, Popular education, Social practiceAbstract
This paper describes the experience of extension activities with pedagogical practices in schoolworkshops with the Rural Sustainability in Rural School Pedro Lovato / RS-Brazil. The experienceresults in practices that seek to reflect the environmental and social situation, in order to offer andshare with the students educational and scientific tasks addressing sustainability and promoting anawareness process. The workshops run of the concept developed by Paulo Freire in building apopular education, involving students in various forms of activities, in practical action, encouragingdiscovery, to think, to create, to experimentation and discussion, seeking autonomy studentthrough criticality being developed. Through group dynamics were developed ten workshopscovering topics of sustainability, animal welfare, milking management, preservation of flora,fauna, cultural and historical restoration ecology, with the construction of compost and gardensuspended. The activities were conducted in June 2012, by students of class 11 and 12 of the discipline of Agricultural Extension UFSM on coordination the teacher responsible for the course,where the results obtained allowed the students both the academic college as the elementaryschool, the proximity and interaction between the school environment and academia, providingthe exchange of knowledge necessary for the development of a social practice that corroboratesin developing an intervention process educative and transformative.
Downloads
References
ALTIERI, M. A. Agroecologia: a dinâmica produtiva da agricultura sustentável 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Ed. da Universidade/UFRGS, 2000.
ARROYO, M.G. Políticas de formação de educadores(as) do campo. Cad. Cedes, Campinas, vol. 27, n. 72, p. 157-176, maio/ago. 2007.
BRASIL. Lei nº 9.394, de 20 de dezembro de 1996. Lei de Diretrizes e Bases da Educação Nacional, Brasília, DF, 20 dez. 1996. Disponível em: http://portal.mec.gov.br/arquivos/pdf/ldb.pdf. Acesso em 21 jul. 2011.
CALDART, R. Por uma educação do campo: traços de uma identidade em construção. In: ARROYO, M.G.; CALDART, R.; MOLINA, M. Por uma educação do campo. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2004.
CAPORAL F. R, RAMOS, L. F. Da extensão rural convencional à extensão rural para o desenvolvimento sustentável: enfrentar desafios para romper a inércia. Brasília, setembro de 2006. (texto em fase de publicação).
CARVALHO, I. “Os sentidos do ambiental: a contribuição da hermenêutica à pedagogia da complexidade”. LEFF, E. (Coord.). A Complexidade Ambiental. São Paulo: Cortez Editora,2003.
DUARTE, R. Adorno/Horkheimer e a dialética do esclarecimento. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 2002.
Estudo da realidade rural-localidade Cortado-Novos Cabrais/RS, Dados de campo Grupo de pesquisa em Extensão Rural Aplicada/UFSM, 2011. (texto em fase de publicação)
FERNANDES, B.M. Os campos da pesquisa em educação do campo: espaço e território como categorias essenciais. I Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Educação do Campo, Brasília, set. 2005.
FÓRUM DE PRÓ-REITORES DE EXTENSÃO DAS UNIVERSIDADES PÚBLICAS BRASILEIRAS Indissociabilidade ensino–pesquisa–extensão e a flexibilização curricular: uma visão da extensão/. Porto Alegre : UFRGS ;Brasília : MEC/SESu, 2006).”
FREIRE, P. Pedagogia do oprimido. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1988, 18ª edição.
______. Pedagogia da autonomia. Saberes necessários à prática educativa. 3. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1997.
Funtowicz e De Marchi, Ciencia Posnormal, Complejidad Reflexiva y Sustentabilidad. In: Leff, E. (ed), La Complejidad Ambiental, Siglo XXI, Mexico,2000.
GADOTTI, M. Saber aprender: um olhar sobre Paulo Freire e as perspectivas atuais da educação. In: LINHARES, C. & TRINDADE, M. N. (Org.) Compartilhando o mundo com Paulo Freire. São Paulo: Cortez, 2003.
GONÇALVES,M.A.S. Teoria da ação comunicativa de Habermas: Possibilidades de uma ação educativa de cunho interdisciplinar na escola. Educação & Sociedade, ano XX, nº 66, Abril/99.
JACOBI, P. Educação e meio ambiente - transformando as práticas. Revista brasileira de educação ambiental /Rede Brasileira de Educação Ambiental. Brasília: Rede Brasileira de Educação Ambiental, 2004.
LEFF,H. La complejidad ambiental Mexico: Siglo XXI, 2 ed. 2003.
SILVA, M. do S. Educação do Campo e Desenvolvimento: uma relação construída ao longo da história. 2004. Disponível em: http://www.contag.org.br/imagens/f299Educacao_do_Campo_e_Desenvolvimento_Sustentavel.pdf. Acesso em: 10 jun.2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
