Ética e cinema: uma proposta interdisciplinar para a educação ambiental
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613086425Keywords:
Environmental Education, Teaching Philosophy, CinemaAbstract
The Teaching of Philosophy and Environmental Education are required in the school curriculum.From this fact, this monograph integrates the theme of environmental education in ethics classes,content that is part of the content of philosophy, using the film as a pedagogical resource. Tofulfill the objective, we performed a literature review concerning the obligation of the Teaching ofPhilosophy and Environmental Education in the school curriculum and about the importance offilm used as a teaching resource in general and specifically to the discipline of philosophy.And yet,we make a "proposal" of interdisciplinarity in Ethics and Cinema to show that environmentalissues can be discussed in a philosophy class and contributing to environmental education. The"proposal" is composed of three moments: 1) Sensitize before the movie through the questions"Man is the master of nature or man is part of nature?” and, "The law is enough to make peopleaware of the importance of the environment?"; 2) Show the movie Wall-E; 3) Talk about conceptsAnthropocentrism, Holism, Consumer Society, Morality and the Law. It is designed for high schoolstudents whose curriculum has content Ethics. Being a "proposal" This work is just one of the waysof working as an interdisciplinary Ethics and Cinema intended for the Environmental Education.
Downloads
References
BARBOSA, Claudio L. de. O ensino de filosofia na educação agrícola de nível médio: perspectivas e desafios. Disponível em: http://www.unioeste.br/cursos/cascavel/pedagogia/eventos/2008/1/Artigo%2078.pdf. Acesso em: 9 de outubro de 2011.
BULOW, Jeremy. An Economic Theory of Planned Obsolescence in, The QuarterlyJournal of Economics, Vol. 101, No. 4, p. 729 ,The MIT Press Novembro/1986.
GONÇALVES, Glaciane Neves; CRUZ-SILVA, Claudia T. A. da. Análise dos conhecimentos sobre problemas ambientais dos alunos do ensino fundamental e ensino médio da rede pública.Revista eletrônica do mestrado em educação ambiental. Rio Grande do Sul. v. 23. jul/dez. 2009.
MILARÉ, Edis. Direito do Ambiente. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2004.
NALINI, José Renato. Ética Ambiental. Campinas: Millennium, 2001.
NAZÁRIO, Clarissa de L. Vídeo: Reflexões sobre a Linguagem e o Uso na Educação. In: PHILIPPI JR, Arlindo; PELICIONI, Maria C. F. (Orgs.). Educação Ambiental e Sustentabilidade. Barueri, SP: Manole, 2005.
SANTOS, Antônio Silveira Ribeiro dos. Direito Ambiental: Surgimento, Importância e Situação Atual. In: BITTAR, Eduardo C. B. (org.) História do Direito Brasileiro: leituras de ordem jurídica nacional. São Paulo: Atlas, 2006.
SEVERINO, Antônio Joaquim. A busca do sentido da formação humana: tarefa da Filosofia da Educação. Educação e Pesquisa, São Paulo, v.32, n.3, p. 619-634, set./dez. 2006. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ep/v32n3/a13v32n3.pdf. Acesso em: 10 de abril de 2012.
Wall-E. Direção de Andrew Stanton. Estados Unidos: PixarAnimationStudios, 2008. 1 DVD (97 min), son.,col., Filme dublado.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
