Environmental education and inclusion of social technology for sanitation in family farmers properties
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613085916Keywords:
eEnvironmental education, Social technology, Family agriculture, SanitationAbstract
This article presents the results of an action research work on environmental education developedin 2010 with family farmers from rural communities in Bandeirante, a town located in the State ofSanta Catarina, Brazil. Since this research is closely related to an educational process, its aim is topropose strategies for environmental education activities and inclusion of social technology forsanitation on family farmers properties in Bandeirante. The reflections presented here highlightthe importance of collective work and dialogical interactions among those involved. This approachwas chosen because it is believed that the quality of life of family farmers and their relationshipwith their environment has been favored, thus contributing to sustainable rural development.
Downloads
References
CAPRA, F. As conexões ocultas: ciência para uma vida sustentável. São Paulo: Cultrix, 2005.
_______. A Teia da Vida: uma nova compreensão científica dos sistemas vivos. São Paulo: Cultrix, 2006.
CERATI, T. M.; LAZARINI, R. A. de M. A pesquisa-ação em educação ambiental: uma experiência no entorno de uma unidade de conservação urbana. Ciência & Educação, v. 15, n. 2, p. 383-92, 2009. Disponível em: http://www.cienciamao.usp.br/tudo/exibir.php?midia=rced&cod=_apesquisa-acaoemeducacao. Acesso em: 2 nov. 2010.
DIAS, G. F. Iniciação à Temática Ambiental. São Paulo: Gaia, 2004.
FREIRE, P. Extensão ou Comunicação? 5. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1980.
_______. A educação e mudança. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1981.
_______. A educação como prática da liberdade. 26. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 2002.
_______. Pedagogia do oprimido. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 2005.
GAMBOA, S. A. S. Análise epistemológica dos métodos na pesquisa educacional: um estudo sobre as dissertações de mestrado em educação da UnB. Brasília: Faculdade de Educação UnB, 1982.
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA. Unidades da Federação. Santa Catarina. Bandeirante. Disponível em: www.ibge.gov.br. Acesso em: 25 ago. 2010.
JACOBI, P. Educação Ambiental, cidadania e sustentabilidade. Cadernos de Pesquisa, n. 118, mar. 2003. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/cp/n118/16834.pdf. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2009.
LEFF, E. Saber Ambiental: sustentabilidade, racionalidade, complexidade, poder. Rio de Janeiro: Vozes, 2001.
MORIN, E. A Cabeça bem-feita – repensar a reforma, reformar o pensamento. Trad. Eloá Jacobina. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 2003.
MELO NETO, J. F. de. Pesquisa-Ação. Aspectos práticos da pesquisa-ação nos movimentos sociais populares e em
extensão popular. Disponível em: http://www.prac.ufpb.br/copac/extelar/producao_academica/artigos/pa_a_pesquisa_acao.pdf. Acesso em: 20 out. 2010.
PISONI, E. M. A educação ambiental e gênero como instrumentos do desenvolvimento rural em municípios de RS. 2009. 338f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Desenvolvimento Rural) – Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2009.
RATTNER, H. Meio Ambiente, saúde e desenvolvimento sustentável. In: Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 2009. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/csc/v14n6/02.pdf. Acesso em: 15 mai. 2009.
SILVA, G.H. R.; NOUR, E. A. A. Reator compartimentado anaeróbio/aeróbio: sistema de baixo custo para tratamento de esgoto de pequenas comunidades. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, v.9, n. 2, p. 268-275, 2005.
TEIXEIRA, A. C. Educação Ambiental: caminho para a sustentabilidade. Revista Brasileira de Educação Ambiental, n.2, Brasília, DF, 2007. Disponível em: http://www.ufmt.br/remtea/revbea/pub/revbea_n_2.pdf. Acesso em: 23 abr. 2010.
THIOLLENT, M. Pesquisa-Ação em Organizações. São Paulo: Atlas, 1997.
TONETTI, et al. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, v.14, n.2, p.227–23, Campina Grande, PB,
UAEA/UFCG. Disponível em: http://www.agriambi.com.br. Acesso em: 5 out. 2010.
TOZZONI-REIS, M. F. C. Pesquisa-Ação: compartilhando saberes; Pesquisa e Ação educativa ambiental. In: Encontros e Caminhos: formação de educadoras (es) ambientais e coletivos educadores. Brasília: MMA, 2005.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
