Environmental education in the formal public education and awareness of the value and importance of water
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613083952Keywords:
Awareness, Environmental education, Environmental awareness, Rational use, Preservation of waterAbstract
In this work there has to be knowledge and environmental practices through a program of research-educational intervention, directed at students in the 4th series of formal public education, the Municipal School Good Shepherd in the town of Panambi-RS. The study aimed at increasing environmental awareness conference about the value and importance of water as well as generate interest, reflection and respect for the environment through the promotion of an interpretive nature trail, encouraging the preservation of natural resources, especially water. To this end, we used the environmental education as the main and strategic awareness and prepare students as the need for moderate and rational use of water, stressing, among the means of sustainability, collection of rainwater. Research-educational intervention consisted of three steps: the realization of questionnaires on environmental knowledge, the establishment of interpretive trail route with visitation to a house containing a system of collecting rainwater and the distribution and planting of seedlings species of native trees in the school. The results showed that the proposed study contributed to qualify and expand the environmental awareness of students, seen as a continuous and ongoing process.Downloads
References
CABRERA, L. É tudo uma questão de princípios, ed. 126, São Paulo, Ed. Abril, Dez. 2008 (Revista Você).
CAPRA, F. Uma nova compreensão científica dos sistemas vivos, São Paulo Berkeley, Editora Cultrix, 1995
FREIRE, P. Educação e Mudança, 16ª ed., São Paulo, Editora Paz e Terra S/A, 1990.
FEIJÓ, C. (org.) et al. Gestão Ambiental: A sociedade, Meio Ambiente e Cidadania. Tópicos Especiais em Educação
Ambiental: Mód. 2, Londrina-PR, Unopar, 2008.
GRASSI, M. Água no Planeta Terra: Cadernos Temáticos de Quimica Nova na Escola, Londrina-PR, [sn], 2001.
GUIMARÃES, V. Uso de Trilha Interpretativa na Educação Ambiental: Uma proposta para o município de Rosário da Limeira - MG, 2006. (Curso de Geografia ) – Faculdade Federal de Juiz de Fora. MAGALHÃES, H. Advogados Associados. O que é Direito Ambiental . Disponível em: www.direitoambiental.adv.br/ambiental.qps/Ref/PAIA6S9TNQ-38k. Acesso em: 29 de abril de 2009
MENDOÇA, R. Nova Escola: O educador ambiental ensina por suas atitudes. Disponível em: http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Educa%C3%A7%C3%A3o_ambiental. Acesso em 25 de julho de 2009.
MERCK, A. Trilhas Ecológicas, Santa Maria, [sn], 2009.(Cartilha)
MUSSAK, E. A crise de percepção, ed. 126, Ed. Abril, São Paulo, Dez. 2008. (Revista Você).
______.Como anda o seu salário, ed. 135, São Paulo, Ed. Abril, Set. 2009. (Revista Você).
PIRES, E. (org.), et al Gestão de recursos hídricos: Gestão Ambiental 3, São Paulo, Pearson Education, 2009.
SILVA, MANZANARES, MOTA, Viabilidade de reutilização de água para vasos sanitários. ed. 2, Agos., 2006 (Revista Ciências do Ambiente On-Line)
TROLEIS, A. Cuidado com a água e com a vida. Jornal Mundo Jovem nº 313, Fev., Porto Alegre - RS, PUC/, 2001.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
