“Que planeta é esse?”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613084253Keywords:
Environmental Education, Early Childhood Education, Garbage, RecyclingAbstract
For a long time humans exploited the environment without concern for preserving the features itoffers. In addition to exploring it indiscriminately and significantly reduce the reserves of drinkingwater, clean air and productive soil, it discards its waste frighteningly increasing the production ofwaste across the planet. Thus, it is essential that, from early childhood education, first stage ofschool education, there is the development of a culture of recycling, in view of the scarcity ofexhaustible natural resources, pollution and lack of space to pack so much garbage. The "Whatplanet is this?" Was developed in the school hall Child Copetti Solange Ana, a member of themunicipal school of Ijuí with 19 students in a kindergarten class II aged between 3 and 4 years. Itwas based on storytelling, tours of observation through the neighborhood and to the creekEspinho, records with pictures and posters, collecting recyclable materials, according to the colorseparation and recycling of scrap making toys, among other activities. From this work it becameevident that the child is naturally curious and observant, and its development takes place throughdiscoveries that do and the relationships you have with the world around it. Thus it is essential todevelop activities that allow them to get in touch with issues relating to environmental issues as correct destination of the garbage and recycling, allowing them to wake up early to importantissues related to the environment and welfare of all mankind.
Downloads
References
ABRAMOVICH, Fanny. Literatura infantil: gostosuras e bobices. São Paulo: Scipione, 1997. Coleção pensamento e ação no magistério.
ALMEIDA, C. M. Biocombustível: Uma análise econômica para a região metropolitana de Salvador. 2002. 69f. Monografia (Trabalho de Conclusão da Especialização em Ciências Econômicas) – Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Bahia, 2002.
BRASIL. Ministério da Educação e do Desporto. Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Referencial Curricular Nacional para Educação Infantil. V.3, Brasília. MEC/SEF 1998
BUJES, Maria Isabel Edelweiss. Escola Infantil: Pra que te quero? In CRAIDY, Carmen e KAERCHER, Gládis E.(org) Educação infantil: pra que te quero?. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2007.p.13-22.
CAGNETI, Sueli Souza. Livro que te quero livro. Rio de Janeiro: Nodica, 1996.
CARVALHO, I. Los sentidos de lo ambiental. In: Leff E. La complejidad ambiental. México (DF): Siglo XXI; 2000.
CAVATON,Maria Fernanda Farah. Desenvolvimento infantil e práticas pedagógicas. In. Simpósio Infantil: construindo o presente. Anais. Brasília:UNESCO Brasil, 2003.
CAMPOS, Maria M.;FÜLLGRAF, Jodete e WIGFGERS, Verena.A qualidade da educação infantil brasileira: alguns resultados de pesquisa. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 2006.
CUBERES, M.T.G. Entre as fraldas e as letras. Contribuições a educação infantil, 2° Ed, Ed Artimed 2002,trad. Beatriz, Alfonso Neves-Porto alegre. ED Artes Medicas 1997.
DIDONET, V. Creche a que veio... Para onde vai. V18, n°73, 93p. 1997.
LOUREIRO, C. F. B. Cidadania e meio ambiente. Salvador: Ed. CRA/BA, 2003. 176p.
LUDKE, André. A pesquisa em educação: abordagens qualitativas. São Paulo: EPU 1996.
PIAGET, Jean. A linguagem e o pensamento da criança. Rio de Janeiro: Fundo de cultura, 1973.
RENNÓ,R.C. Que planeta é esse?5ª edição. São Paulo ed.FTD 1989
ROSENAU, Luciana dos Santos. Pesquisa e pratica profissional. Curitiba Ed,BPEX 2008.
TRISTÃO, Fernanda Carolina Dias. A sutil complexidade das práticas pedagógicas com bebês. In. FILHO, José Altino Martins et.al. Infância plural: crianças do nosso tempo. Porto Alegre: Mediação, 2006.
ZABALZA,Miguel A. Qualidade em Educação Infantil. Trad. Beatriz Affonso Neves. Porto Alegre: Artmed,1998.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.