Educação ambiental; atitudes; atividades práticas, práticas ambientais
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613083949Keywords:
Environmental education, Attitudes, Practical activities, Ambient practicesAbstract
This research aimed to investigate the influence of practical activities in environmental education and its contribution to students’ change of habits and ecological attitudes. The sample is made up of 94 students of the final series of Anita Garibaldi School, located in Igrejinha - RS. The research was carried out in two stages. In the first one, a questionnaire was applied in order to identify students' previous postures knowledge about the theme of environmental Education. Then, students went to the Environmental Center Augusto Kampff (ECAK) to participate of a environmental-focused practice, as the building of a hospital and track activities. Later, the second questionnaire was applied with the intention of verifying whether living with environmental practices contributes or not to get new attitudes related to the environment they live. The analysis of the data showed that the concrete activities helped get new ecological postures, proving that 90 samples get the development of an environmental thought.Downloads
References
ADAMS, B. G. Revista eletrônica Educação Ambiental em Ação. [Entrevista disponibilizada em 5 de dezembro de 2005, a Internet]. Disponível em: <http://www.revistaea.org/artigo.php?idartigo=357&class=08. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2010.
ARAÚJO, A. R. de. O que é Educação Ambiental Disponível em: http://pga.pgr.mpf.gov.br/pga/educacao/que-e-ea/o-que-e-educacao-ambiental. Acesso em: 19 jun. 2010.
CAVALCANTI, L. S. Geografia, escola e construção de conhecimentos. 5 ed. Campinas: Papirus, 2003
DIAS, G. F. Pegada ecológica e sustentabilidade humana. São Paulo: Gaia, 2002.
GADOTTI, M. A ecopedagogia como pedagogia apropriada ao processo da Carta da TERRA. s/ano.
Disponível em: http://www.ufmt.br/revista/arquivo/rev21/moacir_gadotti.htm. Acesso em: 25 out. 2009.
GADOTTI, Moacir. Pedagogia da Terra. São Paulo: Peiropolis, 2000.
GUTIERREZ, F.; PRADO, C. Ecopedagogia e cidadania planetária. 2 ed. São Paulo: Cortez: Instituto Paulo Freire, 2002.
MORAN, J. M Os meios de comunicação na escola. São Paulo: FDE, 1994
REIGOTA, Marcos. O que é educação ambiental. 2. ed. São Paulo: Brasilhiense, 2009.
DEFOURNY, V. Educar agora para garantir o amanhã. 2007. Disponível em: http://www.ideiasocioambiental.com.br/revista_conteudo.php?codConteudoRevista =209. Acesso em: 23 mai. 2009.
MUGGIATI, A. Educação Ambiental: dentro ou fora da Escola? [Entrevista disponibilizada em 21 de janeiro de
, a Internet] - 05 novembro, 2007 – Disponível em: http://www.agirazul.com.br/fsm4/_fsm/00000023.htm. Acesso em: 23 mar. 2010.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
