Novas formas de brincar respeitando a natureza: um trabalho de reciclagem na educação infantil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613083913Keywords:
Child, Learning, Environmental Education, Waste, PlayfulAbstract
This article is referring to a monograph titled NEW WAYS TO PLAY RESPECTING NATURE: recycling work in early childhood education, environmental education course at the Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, presented on July 29, 2011. This work was conducted with students at the Escola Municipal de Educação Infantil Gente Miúda , aims to enable the students to knowledge, sense of values, active interest and attitudes needed to respect, protect and improve the environment, alerting on the problem of the large production of waste and the need for conscious consumption. As methodological strategies, moments of conversation, exploitation films, stories, songs and activities addressed were used. As a way to record, recycling materials and making toys and musical instruments, experiments with waste, and brochure designs, emphasizing the importance of recycling such waste were developed. Data analysis agrees with the theoretical framework, confirming the idea that the child learns through play activities and expands their knowledge through interaction and socialization mediated by the intervention of the educator, it offers subsidies for students to analyze and to contribut for the conservation of the environment. Environmental Education in Early Childhood Education contributes to the construction of new visions and attitudes towards nature, others and themself.Downloads
References
BARRA, V.M.M. Exploração de necessidades sócio- educativas e análise de programas formativos de educadores ambientais com caráter experimental. Tese de doutorado. Santiago de Compostela, 2000.
FREIRE, P. Educação e mudança. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 2007.
FREIRE, P. Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários à prática educativa. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1996.
KAMMI, C.; DEVRIES, R. Piaget para a educação pré- escolar. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas, 1991.
OLIVEIRA, M.K. Vygotsky, aprendizado e desenvolvimento, um processo sócio-histórico. São Paulo: Scipione, 1993.
PANAMBI. Secretaria Municipal de Educação e Cultura. Projeto curricular de educação infantil. Panambi, 2004.
PIAGET, J. A formação do símbolo na criança. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar/MEC, 1975.
TRISTÃO, Fernanda Carolina Dias. A sutil complexidade das práticas pedagógicas com bebês. In. FILHO, José Altino Martins et.al. Infância plural: crianças do nosso tempo. Porto Alegre: Mediação, 2006.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
