Thermal water as a theme in science education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130820453Keywords:
Thermal water, Science teachingAbstract
The teaching of natural science today is based on the mere transmission of content, the use of textbooks, chalk and blackboard. This posture by teachers discourage students learn, so it is of paramount importance the use of methodological proposals that encourage students both to learn in a meaningful and contextualized way, as they become critical citizens, and identify the interrelationships the specific concepts of science to the understanding of natural phenomena. The work has as its theme the thermal waters showing the importance of the subject in every detail, highlighting clearly the water and its applications in various forms. The aim of the study was to describe how the theme of water and its treatment is covered within the science education in which teaching and learning takes place procedural and contextualized way.Downloads
References
ALMEIDA, D.; CASARIN, M. A importância de brincar para a construção do conhecimento na Educação Infantil. Revista Educação Especial, v.19, p.45-53, 2002.
BRASIL. Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais - PCN: Ciências Naturais. Ministério da Educação e do Desporto. Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Brasília: MEC/SEF, 1997.
CASTRO, E. B. Trilha Interpretativa: Recurso Pedagógico para um Processo de Reflexão-na-ação do Docente de Ciências da Natureza. Cuiabá, 2012. 62p. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ensino de Ciências Naturais) Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso.
CUTRIM, A. O.; REBOUÇAS, A. C. Aplicação de sondagem elétrica vertical na estimativa do topo e da espessura de unidade geológicas da Bacia do Paraná na cidade de Rondonópolis-MT. Revista Brasileira de Geofísica (Impresso), v.23, n.1, p.89-98, 2005.
DELIZOICOV, D.; ANGOTTI, J. A.; PERNAMBUCO, M. M. Ensino de Ciências: fundamentos e métodos. São Paulo: Cortez, 2009.
FAVALLI, L. D.; PESSÔA, K. A.; ANGELO, E. A. Projeto Radix Ciências - Ensino Fundamental II. São Paulo: Scipione, 2009.
FREIRE, P. Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários à prática educativa. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 2009.
FREIRE, P. Pedagogia do Oprimido. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 2005.
MARTINS, I. O papel das representações visuais no ensino-aprendizagem de Ciências. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE PESQUISA EM EDUCAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS, 1., 1997, Águas de Lindóia. Anais. Águas de Lindóia: APRAPEC, 1997.
PILLETE, N. Psicologia da Autonomia. São Paulo: Ática, 2006.
SANTOS, B. S (2009). Para uma pedagogia do conflito. In FREITAS, A. L.; MORAES, S. C (Orgs.). Contra o desperdício da experiência. A pedagogia do conflito revisitada. Porto Alegre: Redes Editora Lda., 15-40, 2009.
SILVA, J. J. F.; BELLATO, V.; APOITIA JUNIOR, O. M.; MIGLIORINI, R. B. Estudo hidrogeológico na região de Jaciara, São Pedro da Cipa e Juscimeira, MT. In: XV Congresso Brasileiro de Águas Subterrâneas, São Paulo, 2008.
SOUZA, F. A.; SENRA, R. E. F.; CARBO, L.; MACHADO, N. G.; MELLO, G. J. Estação de tratamento de água e ensino de ciências: uma experiência didática. UNOPAR Científica. Ciências Humanas e Educação, v.15, p.313-319, 2014.
SOUZA, S. P.; ORLANDO, P. H. K. Caldas Novas (GO): Turismo e uso das Águas Termais; XVI Encontro Nacional dos Geógrafos; ENG, 2010.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
