Practice actions and environmental education to preserve sources, Dona Francisca, RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130817705Keywords:
Permanent Preservation area, Small farms, Water resourceAbstract
The study aimed to present the activities developed in the Protection Spring Water Program, conducted in the municipality of Dona Francisca, RS. The lack of water supply in most of the farms and the neglect of the sources led the city government together with the EMATER/RS-ASCAR the city, from 1990 to perform cleanup activities to protect these places of entry sediment contaminants or animal access. In addition, care is had also to the vicinity of the springs, leaving the area protected with insulation, use of practices such as terracing for diversion of surface water, planting native trees in the vicinity when necessary, among other recommendations. Of the 12 analyzed springs, 50% were considered preserved and the rest was as needing intervention. Furthermore, there is the concomitant realization of environmental education activities with the families and children of these beneficiary communities. From the combination of these activities was possible to see a behavioral change in individuals, in the way of thinking and acting, reflecting more aware and responsible actions towards the environment.Downloads
References
BAHIA. Secretaria de Meio Ambiente e Recursos Hídricos – Semarh. Recomposição Florestal de Matas Ciliares. Salvador: Gráfica Print Folhes, 3.ed.rev. e ampl. 2007. 46p.
BARICHELLO, D. E. Modelo de proteção de vertente para o aprimoramento da qualidade da água no meio rural. [Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso]. Santa Maria: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria; 2011. 50p.
BARICHELLO, D. E. Ações práticas e de educação ambiental visando a proteção de nascentes no município de Dona Francisca, RS. [Monografia]. Santa Maria: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria; 2014. 58p.
BRASIL. Lei nº 12651, de 25 de maio de 2012. Institui o novo Código Florestal. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 25 maio. 2012. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato20112014/2012/Lei/L12651.htm#art83. Acesso em 10 de outubro 2014.
CASALI, C. A. Qualidade da água para consumo humano ofertada em escolas e comunidades rurais da região central do Rio Grande do Sul. [Dissertação]. Santa Maria: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria; 2008. 173p.
CONBOY, M. J.; GOSS, M. J. Natural protection of groundwater against bacteria of fecal origin. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2000;v. 43: p. 1-24.
GANDOLFI, S.; RODRIGUES, R. R. Recomposição de florestas nativas: algumas perspectivas metodológicas para o Estado de São Paulo. Anais... 3º Curso de Atualização - Recuperação de Áreas Degradadas. Curitiba, PR. FUPEF/UFPR, 1996. v.1. p.83-100.
GONÇALVES, C. S. Qualidade de águas superficiais na microbacia hidrográfica do arroio Lino Nova Boêmia – Agudo – RS. [Dissertação]. Santa Maria: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria; 2003. 90p.
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA - IBGE. Resultados Preliminares do Universo do Censo Demográfico 2010. Disponível em http://www.ibge.gov.br. Acesso em: Outubro 2014.
MARCUZZO, S. B.; SILVEIRA, V.; LOPES, E.; MINUZZI, T. Trilhas interpretativas, uma ferramenta eficiente para educação ambiental. Educação Ambiental em Ação, v. 13, p. 1-9, 2015.
MIRANDA, M. C. P. C.; MUNIZ, F. H. Impacto do gado bovino sobre os ecossistemas do Parque Estadual do Mirador – PEM. Pesquisa em Foco, v. 17, n.1, p. 31-42, 2009.
MONTEIRO, A. M. Entre o estranho e o familiar: o uso de analogias no ensino de história. Cad. Cedes, Campinas, vol. 25, n. 67, p. 333-347, set./dez. 2005.
NAVE, A. G. Banco de sementes autóctone e alóctone, resgate de plantas e plantio de vegetação nativa na Fazenda Intermontes, município de Ribeirão Grande, SP. 2005. 218f. Tese (Doutorado em Recursos Florestais) – Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Piracicaba, 2005.
PEDROSO, C. V.; AMORIM, M. A. L. Uso de uma atividade didática baseada em analogia para o ensino de genética: o que há de comum entre dois prédios iguais e cromossomos homólogos? Anais... X Salão de Iniciação Científica, PUCRS, 2009.
PINZON, S. A.; BARICHELLO, D. E. Comunicação pessoal. 2014.
REIS, A., KAGEYAMA, P.Y. Restauração de áreas degradadas utilizando interações interespecíficas. In: KAGEYAMA, P.Y.; OLIVEIRA, R.E.; MORAES, L.F.D.; ENGEL, V.L.; GANDARA, F.B. (Eds.) Restauração Ecológica de Ecossistemas Naturais. Botucatu: Fundação de Estudos e Pesquisas Agrícolas e Florestais (FEPAF), 2003. p. 91-100.
RORATO, G. G.; CANTO-DOROW, T. S.; RORATO, D. G.; ROSITO, J. M. Educação Ambiental e o despertar para a cidadania. Reget. 2014;v. 18 (n. 2): p. 745-752.
SCHNEIDER, P. R., GALVÃO, F., LONGHI, S. L. Influência do pisoteio de bovinos em áreas florestais. Floresta, Curitiba, v. 9, n. 1, p. 19-23. 1978.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
