Preliminary Analysis of Environmental Risks Related Activities for the drilling of a Well of Land Oil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130813051Keywords:
Environmental Perception, Environmental Education, Inclusive Education, João PessoaAbstract
This study evaluate the process of drilling a Well Land Oil, in all its stages in order to map the environmental risks to which their employees are exposed. To this end, we carried out a qualitative survey, which allowed describing and analyzing the physical risks by employing the technique of Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA). Data were collected and analyzed using various sources in the literature, and applying a criterion to assess damage severity and consequences of each hazard and risk. The results obtained from the study showed the need for adopting preventive and corrective measures in order to avoid accidents in the process of drilling a well, because this is one of the steps regarding the Exploration and Production of Oil that presents the greatest diversity and concentration of risk greater number of workers that industry, in particular with a high percentage of moderate items in the classification adopted.Downloads
References
Aneel, Aplicações, atlas. Disponível em: http://www.aneel.gov.br/aplicacoes/atlas/pdf/07Petroleo%282%29.pdf.
Nascimento, Claudio Augusto Oller; Moro, Lincoln Fernando Lautenschlager. Petróleo: energia do presente,
matéria-prima do futuro? Rev. USP no.89 São Paulo mar./maio 2011. Disponível em: http://rusp.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S010399892011000200007&lng=pt&nrm=iso.
MARTINS, Rosiney Araújo; SILVEIRA, Iracema Miranda da. O Programa de Monitoramento Ambiental na Perfuração Exploratória Onshore: Considerações Sobre o Real e o Teórico no Rio Grande do Norte. IV Congreço de Pesquisa e Inovação da Rede Norte e Nordeste de Educação Tecnológica, Belém-PA, 2009. Disponível em: http://connepi2009.ifpa.edu.br/connepi-anais/artigos/47_356_177.pdf.
MARTINS, Rosiney Araújo; SILVEIRA, Iracema Miranda da. O Programa de Monitoramento Ambiental na Perfuração Exploratória Onshore: Considerações Sobre o Real e o Teórico no Rio Grande do Norte. IV Congreço de Pesquisa e Inovação da Rede Norte e Nordeste de Educação Tecnológica, Belém-PA, 2009. Disponível em: http://connepi2009.ifpa.edu.br/connepi-anais/artigos/47_356_177.pdf.
Nascimento, Claudio Augusto Oller; Moro, Lincoln Fernando Lautenschlager. Petróleo: energia do presente,
matéria-prima do futuro? Rev. USP no.89 São Paulo mar./maio 2011. Disponível em: http://rusp.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S010399892011000200007&lng=pt&nrm=iso.
Costa, Lucia de Fátima Lúcio Gomes da; Aquino, Francisco Nixon Pereira de Macedo. Riscos Ambientais Em Uma Sonda De Perfuração De Petróleo Onshore Na Unidade De Negócios - RN/CE- Mpssoró/RN. Revista Holos- ISSN 1807-1600, V.4 (2013). Disponível em: http://www2.ifrn.edu.br/ojs/index.php/HOLOS/article/view/587.
Faria, Karla Maria Silva de. Impactos Ambientais, Conceitos e Definições. Disponível em: http://www.labogef.iesa.ufg.br/labogef/arquivos/downloads/I-_Impactos_Ambientais-_Conceitos_e_Definicoes_01600.pdf
Costa, Lucia de Fátima Lúcio Gomes da; Aquino, Francisco Nixon Pereira de Macedo. Riscos Ambientais Em Uma Sonda De Perfuração De Petróleo Onshore Na Unidade De Negócios - RN/CE- Mossoró/RN. Revista Holos- ISSN 1807-1600, V.4 (2013). Disponível em:http://www2.ifrn.edu.br/ojs/index.php/HOLOS/article/view/587.
Souza, Paulo Juvêcia Berta de; Lima, Valdir Luioza de. Avaliação das Técnicas de Disposição de Rejeitos da Perfeita Terrestre de Poços de Petróleo. Salvador, 2002. Disponível em: http://teclim.ufba.br/site/material_online/monografias/mono_souza_e_lima.pdf.
Souza, Paulo Juvêcia Berta de; Lima, Valdir Luioza de. Avaliação das Técnicas de Disposição de Rejeitos da Perfeita Terrestre de Poços de Petróleo. Salvador, 2002. Disponível em: http://teclim.ufba.br/site/material_online/monografias/mono_souza_e_lima.pdf.
Galvão, Maria Cristiane Barbosa. O levantamento bibliográfico e a pesquisa científica. Disponível em: http://www2.eerp.usp.br/Nepien/DisponibilizarArquivos/Levantamento_bibliografico_CristianeGalv.pdf.
Moresi, Eduardo. Metodologia da Pesquisa. Universidade Católica de Brasília – UCB. Brasília – DF, 2003.
Disponível em: http://www.inf.ufes.br/~falbo/files/MetodologiaPesquisa-Moresi2003.pdf.
Dalfovo, Michael Samir; Lana, Rogério Adilson; Silveira, Amélia. Métodos Quantitativso e Qualitativos: Um Resgate Teórico. o. Revista Interdisciplinar Científica Aplicada, Blumenau, v.2, n.4, p.01-13, Sem II. 2008. ISSN 1980-7031.
I.R.A. Nogueira; L.V.L. de Mendonça; P.C.C. de Sá; C.E.M. Jerônimo. Beneficiamento do Sal: Uma visão
de Riscos Ambientais. Revista Holos, v. 3 (2013). Disponível em: http://www2.ifrn.edu.br/ojs/index.php/HOLOS/article/view/994.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
