Use of groundwater in Frederico Westphalen-RS: socio-environmental conditions of the users
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130810937Keywords:
Supply, Alternative sources, WellsAbstract
With the increasing levels of soil contamination, alternative sources of water supply are becoming a threat to the health of the population that uses this feature. Thus, this study aims to determine and evaluate the social and environmental conditions of the users of alternative sources of water supply Frederico Westphalen - RS. The evaluation was done through visits to homes and by applying a questionnaire with several questions on the topic of alternative sources of supply, during the year 2011 and 2012. The number of wells, types, locations in UTM coordinates, static levels and situations they were in were raised in these visits. Therefore, it is concluded that even having access to the public network, many users still use alternative sources to supply their homes, this being a major concern, since many users are unaware of the quality of the water used for consumption.
Downloads
References
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE ÁGUAS SUBTERRÂNEAS – ABAS. Contaminação e remediação de águas subterrâneas. Disponível em: http://www.abas.org/educacao_contaminacao.php. Acesso em: 9 de Outubro de 2013.
BRAGA, B.; HESPANHOL, I.; CONEJO, J. G. L.; BARROS, M. T. L. De; PORTO, M.; NUCCI, N.; JULIANO, N.; EIGER, S. Introdução a engenharia ambiental. São Paulo: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2005.
BRASIL. Classificação e diretrizes ambientais para o enquadramento das águas subterrâneas e dá outra providência. Brasília, DF, Conselho Nacional de Meio Ambiente. Diário Oficial da União, Portaria n.2.914, 12 de dez, 2001.
CAJAZEIRA, C. C de A. Qualidade e uso das águas subterrâneas e a relação com doenças de veiculação hídrica, região de Crajubar/ CE. 2007. 131f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Geologia) – Programa de Pós-graduação em Geologia, Universidade Federal
do Ceará, Fortaleza, 2007.
KEMERICH, P. D. da C. Água subterrânea e a saúde da comunidade em bairro de Santa Maria –RS. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Civil e Saneamento Ambiental) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Civil, Universidade Federal de Santa
Maria, Santa Maria, 2008.
KEMERICH, P. D da C.; SAUCEDO, E. M. Saúde e condições sócio-ambientais de usuários de água subterrânea no bairro nossa senhora do perpétuo socorro de Santa Maria – RS. Engenharia AmbientalEspirito Santo do Pinhal, Vol.8, n.3, p.038-050, 2011.
MANASSÉS, F. Caracterização hidroquímica da água subterrânea da formação Serra Geral na região Sudoeste do Estado do Paraná. 2009. 136f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Geologia Ambiental) – Programa de Pós-graduação em Geologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, 2009.
ORGANIZAÇÃO DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS – ONU. Sustentabilidade e Equidade: Um Futuro Melhor para Todos. Relatório do desenvolvimento humano. Nova York: ONU, 2011.
ROHDE, F.; ROSSI, E. M.; SCAPIN, D.; CUNHA, F. P. Da; SARDIGLIA, C. U. Monitoramento microbiológico de águas subterrâneas em cidades do Extremo-Oeste de Santa Catarina. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, Vol.14, n.6, p. 2199-2203, 2009.
VERÍSSIMO, L. S.; MELO, F.; MENESES, F. A.; CARNEIRO, M. M. M. ALBUQUERQUE, V. C. Diagnóstico dos poços tubulares e a qualidade das águas subterrâneas no município de Campo Maior – PI. XIII CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE ÁGUAS SUBTERRÂNEAS, 2004. Anais eletrônicos... Cuiabá: ABAS, 2004. Disponível em: http://www.cprm.gov.br/publique/media/diagnostico_pocos.pdf. Acesso em: 10 de Julho de 2012.
ZANATTA, L. C.; COITINHO, J. B. L. Utilização de poços profundos no aquífero guarani para abastecimento público em Santa Catarina. XII CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE ÁGUAS SUBTERRÂNEAS, 2002. Anais eletrônicos... Florianópolis: ABAS, 2002. Disponível em: www.aquiferoguarani.ufsc.br/artigos/zanatta.pdf. Acesso em: 20 de Outubro de 2012.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
