Metadiscourse from Hyland’s perspective: definitions, categorization models, and possible contributions.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2176148525732Keywords:
Metadiscourse, Interaction, Stance, Engagement, WritingAbstract
Metadiscourse is a field of study that has received much attention in different areas of the study of language from various theoretical perspectives and it can be considered as the embodiment of the relations of interaction between interlocutors through the text. It is relevant to thinking about the difficulties of defining the term metadiscourse, and so this article intends to present the definitions commonly used, to indicate some models or theoretical frameworks that work with this concept and to point possible applications of these studies. It presents some theoretical and practical perspectives in the study of this theme, and it intends to offer a subsidy for future research in different social spheres.
Downloads
References
ADEL, Annelie. Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 2006.
AMIRYOUSEFI, Mohammad; RASEK, Abbass Eslami. Metadiscourse: definitions, issues and its implications for English teachers. English language teaching, v. 3, n.4, 2010, p. 159-167. Disponível em: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1081977.pdf . Acesso em: 12 jan. 2016.
BEAUGRAND, Robert de. New foundations for a Science of text and discourse: cognition, communication, and freedom of access to knowledge and society. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex, 1997.
CAVALCANTE, Mônica Magalhães. Metadiscursividade, argumentação e referenciação. Estudos linguísticos, São Paulo, v. 38, 1998, p.345-354.
CRISMORE, Avon. Talking with readers: metadiscourse as rhetorical act. New York: Longman, 1989.
CRISMORE, Avon; FARSNWORTH, Rodney. Metadiscourse in Popular and Professional Science Discourse. In: W. NASH (ed.), The Writing Scholar: Studies in Academic Discourse. Newbury Park, Sage, 1989.
FARIA, Maria da Graça dos Santos. A metadiscursividade em redações dissertativas de vestibulandos. Fortaleza, 2009.117 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Linguística) – Universidade Federal do Ceará. Departamento de Letras Vernáculas, 2009.
FLOWERDEW, John. Revisiting metadiscourse: conceptual and methodological issues concerning signaling nouns. Ibérica, v. 29, p.15-34, 2015. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281959046_Revisiting_metadiscourse_Conceptual_and_methodological_issues_concerning_signalling_nouns. Acesso em: 30 jan. 2017.
FIORIN, José Luiz. Argumentação. São Paulo: Contexto, 2015.
HALLIDAY, Michael Alexander Kirkwood; HASAN, Ruqaiya. Cohesion in spoken and written English. Longman: Londres, 1976.
HALLIDAY, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold, 1994.
HARRIS, Randy Allen. Rhetoric of science. College English, v 53, 1959, p. 282-307.
HYLAND, Ken. Persuasion and Context: the pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. In: Journal of curriculum studies. Vol. 30, 1998a, p. 437-455. Disponível em:< http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216698000095>. Acesso em 10 jan. 2017.
HYLAND, Ken. Directives: argument and engagement in academic writing. Applied Linguistics, v.23, 2002, p.215-239. Disponível em: < http://www2.caes.hku.hk/kenhyland/files/2012/08/Directive_arguments-and-engagement-in-academic-writing.pdf>. Acesso em: 30 jan. 2017.
HYLAND, Ken. Self-citation and self-reference: credibility and promotion in an academic publication. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, v. 54, 2003, p.251-259. Disponível em:< https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220435626_Self-citation_and_Self-reference_Credibility_and_Promotion_in_Academic_Publication>. Acesso em: 08 dez. 2016.
HYLAND, Ken. Metadiscourse: exploring interaction in writing. Continuum: Londres, 2005a.
HYLAND, Ken. Stance and engagement: a model of Interaction in Academic Discourse. In: Discourse Studies. Sage publications, 2005b. Disponível em: http://www2.caes.hku.hk/kenhyland/files/2012/08/Stance-and-engagement_a-model-of-interaction-in-academic-discourse.pdf Acesso em: 08 jan. 2017.
HYLAND, Ken. Writing in the disciplines: research evidence for specificity. Taiwan International ESP Journal, v.1, 2009, p.5-22. Disponível em: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267817913_Writing_in_the_disciplines_Research_evidence_for_specificity>. Acesso em: 20 jan. 2017.
HYLAND, Ken. Disciplinary identities: individuality and community in academic discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge, 2012.
HYLAND, Ken; TSE, Polly. Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied linguistics 25, v. p. 156-177. Disponível em: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31418041_Metadiscourse_in_Academic_Writing_A_Reappraisal>. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2016.
HU, Guangwei; CAO, Feng. Disciplinary and paradigmatic influences on interactional metadiscourse in research articles. English for academic purposes, v.39, p.12-25, 2015.Disponível em: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889490615000216>. Acesso em: 15 jan. 2017.
KWAN, Becky Siu Chu; CHAN, Hang. An investigation of source use in the results and the closing sections of empirical articles in information systems: in search of a functional-semantic citation typology for pedagogical purposes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, v.14, p. 29-47, 2014.
KOCH, Ingedore Villaça. Desvendando os segredos do texto. São Paulo: Cortez, 2002.
KOCH, Ingedore Villaça; ELIAS, V. M. Ler e escrever: estratégias de produção textual. São Paulo: contexto, 2009.
MARCUSCHI, Luiz Antônio. Produção textual, análise de gêneros e compreensão. São Paulo: Parábola, 2008.
PINTON, Francieli Matzembacher. O jornalista, o especialista e professor leitor: relações diretivas na revista Nova Escola. Escrita. Nilópolis, v.4, n.2, Especial, 2013. Disponível em: http://www.uniabeu.edu.br/publica/index.php/RE/article/view/715. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2017.
ROCHA, Silmara Ferreira da. Funções discursivas dos marcadores metadiscursivos no gênero carta ao leitor. Dissertação de Mestrado submetida ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística da Universidade Federal do Ceará – UFC, como parte dos requisitos necessários para a obtenção do título de Mestre em Linguística. 2011. 105f.
SILVA, Carla Luciana. A Carta ao Leitor de Veja: um estudo histórico sobre editoriais. Intercom – Revista Brasileira de Ciências da Comunicação. São Paulo, v.32, n.1, p. 89-107, jan./jun. 2009. Disponível em: <http://www.portcom.intercom.org.br/revistas/index.php/revistaintercom/article/viewFile/239/232>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2017.
VANDE KOPPLE, William. Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. In: College Composition and Communication, v. 36, 1985, p.82-93. Disponível em: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/357609?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>. Acesso em 10 dez. 2016. Letras, Santa Maria, v. 27, n. 54, p. 41-67, jan./jun. 2017.
VIAN JR., Orlando. Sistema de avaliatividade e os recursos para gradação em Língua Portuguesa: questões terminológicas e de instanciação. DELTA. Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada, v. 25:1, p. 99-129, 2009. Disponível em: <http://www.scielo.br/pdf/delta/v25n1/a04v25n1.pdf>. Acesso em 10 fev. 2017.
VIAN JR., Orlando. Avaliatividade, engajamento e valoração. DELTA. Documentação de Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada (Online), v. 28, p.105, 2012. Disponível em: <https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/delta/article/view/19503/14457>. Acesso em 10 fev. 2017.
WILLIAMS, Joseph M.. Style: Tem lessons in clarity and Grace. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman, 1985.
