The ambivalence of the External Evaluation of Schools effects in the school practices

Authors

  • Gustavo E. Fischman Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, Estados Unidos
  • Amelia Marcetti Topper Investigadora independiente, Providence, Rhode Island, Estados Unidos
  • Iveta Silova Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, Estados Unidos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/1984686X33483

Keywords:

External evaluation of schools, Accountability, Responsibility, Effects.

Abstract

This article aims to describe the External Evaluation of Schools in Portugal through a brief framework of this system based on the guidelines of the European educational policies, in a logic of reciprocity between the national and transnational level, with the purpose of reflecting around the questions: Does the External Evaluation of Schools promote educational quality? What effects does the External Evaluation of Schools have on teaching practices? If, on the one hand, there are some studies that highlight the fact that the External Evaluation of Schools promotes a transformative and formative approach to the school practices through more or less direct consequences, on the other, there are studies that clarify that these effects reflected with shallow depth in the pedagogical reality. It is in this ambiguous context that is intended to deepen the reflection around the External Evaluation of Schools and their effects on school practices, namely, in the curricular and pedagogical dimensions, drawing on the conclusions of several national and international studies to increase the discussion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2018-10-09

How to Cite

Fischman, G. E., Topper, A. M., & Silova, I. (2018). The ambivalence of the External Evaluation of Schools effects in the school practices. Special Education Magazine, 31(63), 785–814. https://doi.org/10.5902/1984686X33483

Issue

Section

Dossiê – Avaliar, diagnosticar, medir: das práticas avaliativas a avaliações em larga escala na Educação Especial