Digital monitoring of alcoholic beverage fermentation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X86991Keywords:
Craft beer, Alcoholic fermentation, Wort densityAbstract
In this paper, a solution for real-time measurement of the density of alcoholic fermentation is proposed. Two pressure sensors are placed in two vertical locations inside the fermentation tank of a brewery to calculate the density considering basic hydrostatic concepts. The obtained signals are converted by a 14-bit A/D device equipped with Bluetooth technology. Pressure data are collected by these sensors, which operate in the 0 – 10 kPa range. This approach results in a resolution of 1/163884, measuring a range of 0 to 5 V, an accuracy of 0.61 Pa, and a total density uncertainty of 0.15 %. The results are compared to two commercial instruments, a conventional hydrometer, and a portable refractometer. The best concordance is obtained with a conventional hydrometer, with a maximum deviation of 0.37 %.
Downloads
References
Beckwith, T.G., Marangoni, R. D., & Lienhard, J.H. (2011). Mechanical Measurements. 6. ed. Nova York: Pearson Education.
Brewer’s Friend. (2011). “Alcohol By Volume Calculator Updated”. Retrieved from: https://www.brewersfriend.com/2011/06/16/alcohol-by-volume-calculator-updated/.
Çengel, Y. A., & Cimbala, J. M. (2015). Mecânica dos Fluidos: Fundamentos e Aplicações. 3. ed. Porto Alegre: AMGH.
Caged. (2023). Cadastro Geral de Empregados e Desempregados. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.br/trabalho-e-emprego/pt-br/assuntos/estatisticas-trabalho/novo-caged/novo-caged-2023/dezembro.
Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. (2008). JCGM 100:2008: GUM: 1995 with minor corrections: Evaluation of measurement data — Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Europe.
Kunze, W. (2014). Technology of Malting and Brewing. 5. ed. Berlim, Alemanha.
Lachenmeier, D. W., Godelmann, R., Steiner, M., Ansay, B., Weigel, J., & Krieg, G. (2010). Rapid and mobile determination of alcoholic strength in wine, beer and spirits using a flow-through infrared sensor. Chemistry Central Journal, 4(5), 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-153X-4-5.
Brasil. (2023). Ministério da Agricultura e Pecuária. Anuário da Cerveja 2022. Ministério da Agricultura e Pecuária. Secretaria de Defesa Agropecuária. Brasília: MAPA/SDA.
Palmer, J.J. (2017). How to Brew: Everything you need to know to brew great beer every time. 4. ed. Brewers Publications.
Viginoski, C. L. F. (2013). Sistema utilizando vibração de um transdutor piezoelétrico para medir densidade de um líquido. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Elétrica) - Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR.
White, C., & Zainasheff, J. (2010). Yeast: the practical guide to beer fermentation. Colorado: Brewers Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.