Utilization of agate powder residue for manufacturing ecological bricks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X84073Keywords:
Ecological bricks, Sustainability, Agate, WasteAbstract
In recent years, it has become increasingly important to search for alternatives for the development of new materials with sustainable characteristics. This is due to the fact that the environmental problems faced by the whole world have become increasingly worrying due to their serious short and long term impacts. In view of this, the use of materials from reuse and the disposal of polluting waste shows itself as an excellent alternative for the development of new products. Considering the mineral sector as a major generator of solid waste, this study proposed the reuse of agate powder, a residue from the extraction and processing process of agate stone, for the manufacture of ecological bricks. Mechanical compression tests were performed on bricks with 7, 14, 21 and 28 days, thus obtaining a mechanical strength profile. The results obtained were compared with those proposed by NBR 8491 (2012), which proved very promising, being above the values proposed by the standard in all cases.
Downloads
References
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. ABNT. NBR 5739: concreto – ensaios de compressão de corpos de prova cilíndricos, 2018.Disponível em: https://www.studocu.com/pt-br/document/universidade-federal-do-reconcavo-da-bahia/materiais-de-construcao-ii/nbr-5739-2018-concreto-ensaio-de-compressaode-corpos-de-prova-cilindricos/19436090. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2023.
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. ABNT. NBR 8491: tijolo de solo-cimento – requisitos, Rio de Janeiro, 2012. Disponível em: https://www.alroma.com.br/uploads/arquivos_documentos/NBR_8491_-_Norma_Tijolo_de_Solo_Cimento_Requisitos_-_Alroma.pdf. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2023.
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. ABNT. NBR 8492: tijolo de solo - cimento – análise dimensional, determinação de resistência à compressão e da absorção de água – método de ensaio, Rio de Janeiro: 2012. Disponível em: https://www.alroma.com.br/uploads/arquivos_documentos/NBR_8492_-_Norma_Tijolo_de_Solo_Cimento_-_Resist%C3%AAncia_e_Absor%C3%A7%C3%A3o_-_Alroma.pdf. Acesso em 10 mar. 2023.
BALDIN, C. R. B.; PEREIRA FILHO, J. I.; BALDIN, V. Estudo da influência da substituição do cimento Portland por resíduo de cerâmica vermelha na fabricação de placas de fibrocimento. Revista Matéria, Rio de Janeiro, v. 26, n. 1, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/rmat/a/QnpBrKYWW8jdCh4768xfnXJ/?format=pdf&lang=pt. Acesso em: 3 maio 2023.
BETAT, E. F. Concretos produzidos com resíduos do beneficiamento de ágata: avaliação da resistência à compressão. 2006. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Civil) – Universidade Luterana do Brasil, Canoas, 2006.
BRASIL. Conselho Nacional Do Ministério Público. Comissão do Meio Ambiente. Diretrizes para valoração de danos ambientais. Brasília, DF: Biblioteca do CNMP, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.cnmp.mp.br/portal/images/Publicacoes/documentos/2021/DIRETRIZES-PARA-VALORACAO-DE-DANOS-AMBIENTAIS_compressed1.pdf. Acesso em: 25 mar. 2023.
BRASIL. Lei nº 13.305, de 2 de agosto de 2010. Institui a Política Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos; altera a Lei nº 9.605, de 12 de fevereiro de 1998; e dá outras providências. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 2010. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2010/lei/l12305.htm. Acesso em: 3 maio 2023.
COSTA, R. M. da; JORNADA, M. I. H. da. Arranjo Produtivo de Pedras, Gemas e Joias do Alto da Serra do Botucaraí. Relatório II. Porto Alegre: FEE, 2015. Relatório do Projeto Estudo de Aglomerações Industriais e Agroindustriais no RS. Disponível em: https://arquivofee.rs.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/20160721pedras-gemas-e-joias-relatorio-ii.pdf. Acesso em: 14 mar. 2023.
FRANÇA NETA, M. de L. X. de. et al. Avaliação da reatividade ao ataque químico de resíduo oriundo da mineração da scheelita utilizado como agregado em argamassas cimentícias. Revista Engenharia Sanitária Ambiental, Mossoró, v. 26, n. 6, p. 1135-1142, nov./dez. 2021. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/esa/a/mvCkqnRdBBVRt3RfGNFfMRh/?format=pdf. Acesso em: 5 maio 2023.
IPCC. Painel Intergovernamental sobre Mudanças Climáticas. AR 6 (2021). v.6, p. 1-2409, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/mcti/pt-br/acompanhe-o-mcti/sirene/publicacoes/relatorios-do-ipcc/arquivos/pdf/IPCC_mudanca2.pdf. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2023.
MEHTRA, P. K.; FOLLIARD, K. J. Rice Husk Ash-a unique supplementary cement material: durability aspects. In: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCES IN CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY, 154., Las Vegas. Proceedings [...]. Atenas: Symposium Paper, 1995. p. 531-542. Disponível em: https://www.concrete.org/publications/internationalconcreteabstractsportal.aspx?m=details&id=968. Acesso em: 20 maio 2023
MICHELIN, C. R. L. et al. Depósitos de ágata e de opala no estado do Rio Grande do Sul. In: JELINEK, A. R. Contribuições à Geologia do Rio Grande do Sul e de Santa Catarina. Porto Alegre: Compasso Lugar-Cultura, 2021. p. 355-370. Disponível em: https://lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/handle/10183/221977/001126536.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Acesso em: 6 maio 2023.
MOAYEDI, H. et al. Applications of rice husk ash as green and sustainable biomass. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 237, nov. 2019. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652619327210?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 25 mar. 2023.
SILVA, R. de A.; SCHNEIDER, I. A. H. Geração de Resíduos no Processamento de Ágatas. Revista de Engenharia Civil IMED, Passo Fundo, v. 2, n. 1, p. 11-16, 2015. Disponível em: https://seer.atitus.edu.br/index.php/revistaec/article/view/778/581. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.