New Occurrences of Macrofungi (Basidiomycota) in Southern Amazonas, Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X42829Keywords:
Fungi, Mycology, Basidiomycota, Southern Amazon, AmazonAbstract
Macrofungi are organisms that have macroscopic reproductive structures, called ascocarps and basidiocarps, and are important representatives of Ascomycota and Basidiomycota, respectively. The Amazon rainforest, as it offers a large number of natural resources, is one of the biomes that has been under great environmental pressure and sustainable use that takes into account social, economic and ecological factors is extremely important for protecting the forest. Given this context, this work aimed to present the characterization of the species that constitute occurrences of macrofungi for the Southern region of the state of Amazonas, contributing to the expansion of the knowledge on the geographical distribution of the specimens found. This survey was carried out at the Tenente Pimenta Jungle Base located 20 kilometers from the Municipality of Humaitá- state of Amazonas. The collections were carried out in two different periods, in the pre-existing trails of the Tenente Pimenta Jungle Base (54th BIS). 115 specimens belonging to 11 families were found, with species belonging to Ascomycota and Basidiomycota being identified. The data related to the collection periods of macroscopic fungi were from August 2019 and November 2019. In August 2019, a dry season in the Amazon, with little rain, 70 specimens of macrofungi were collected. In November, a rainy period in the Amazon, 105 specimens of macrofungi were collected. The data obtained from this research will serve as a basis for further studies in the state of Amazonas, since it is a pioneer in the southern region of the state. There is a great diversity of macrofungi in the study area, however, edaphoclimatic factors are relevant at different periods of the year.
Downloads
References
ADASKAVEG JE; MILLER RW; GILBERTSON RL. Wood decay. lignicolous fungi and decline of peach trees in South Carolina. Plant disease. 1993; 7(77): 707-711.
ARIFFIN, D; IDRIS AS, G. SINGH; J. Ganoderma Doenças de culturas perenes, CABI Publishing, Wallingford 2000; (1): 49-68.
ALEXOPOULOS CJ, MIMS CW, BLACKWELL M. Introductory Mycology. 4 th ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Nova York, 868p, 1996.
ANTONÍN V, NOORDELOOS M.E. A monograph of marasmioid and collybioid fungi in Europe. IHW-Verlag, Eching, 2010.
CAVALIER, SMITH T. A revised six-kingdom system of life. Biol. Rev.1998, 73(1) 203-266.
CARVALHO MD, AMAZONAS M. Diversidade e distribuição sazonal da produtividade de corpos frutíferos de fungos ectomicorrízicos associados a plantações de Pinus spp. e Eucalyptus spp. da Embrapa Florestas. IAnais do I EVENTO DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA DA EMBRAPA FLORESTAS. [Internet]; 2002, Colombo–03 a, 5. Avaible from: /www.embrapa.br/ /digital/bitstream/item/99130.
DESJARDIN DE, RETNOWATI A, HORAK E. Agaricales of Indonesia. A preliminary monograph of Marasmius from Java and Bali. Sydowia. 2000,52(1): 92-194.
DENNIS, RWG. Fungus flora of Venezuela and adjacent countries. Kew bulletin, 1970, 584 pp.
FURTADO JS. Structure of the spore of the Ganodermoideae Donk. Rickia.1962; 1(1): 227-241.
FURTADO JS. Taxonomy of Amauroderma (Basidiomycetes, Polyporaceae). Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden, 1981; 34(1): 1-109.
GOI SR, SOUZA FA. Diversidade de microrganismos do solo. Floresta e Ambiente, Seropédica, 2006; 13(2): 46-65.
GOMES-SILVA AL, GIBERTONI TB. Revisão do Herbário URM. Novas ocorrências de Aphyllophorales para a Amazônia brasileira. Revista Brasileira de Botânica. (2009a); 32(3): 587-596.
GOMES-SILVA AL, GIBERTONI TB. Checklist of the aphyllophoraceous fungi (Agaricomycetes) of the Brazilian Amazonia. Revista Mycotaxon, (2009b); 108(2):319–322.
HAWKSWORTH DL. The magnitude of fungal diversity: the 1,5 million species estimate revised. Mycological Research. 2001,105(12): 1422-1432.
HOLF J. A.; KLOPFENSTEIN, N. B.; TONN, J. R.; MCDONALD, G.I.; ZAMBINO, P. J.; ROGERS, J.D.; PEEVER, T.L.; CARRIS, L. M. Roles of Woody RootAssociated Fungi. In: Forest Ecosystem Processes: Recent Advances in Fungal Identification. Rocky Mountain Research Station. 2004.
IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística). 2017 Cidades. Disponível em < https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/am/humaita> Acesso 10 de Março de 2020 às 10:00h.
INCRA – Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária. Relatório de Análise de mercado de terras Mercado Regional de terras Sul Amazonense. v.1. Manaus: INCRA, 2016. Disponível em: .
KIRK PM, CANON PF, DAVID JC, STALPERS JA. Ainsworth & Bisby’s Dictionary of the Fungi. CABI International. 2001. Wallingford.
KIRK PM, CANNON, P.F.; DAVID, J.C.; STALPERS, J.A. Dictionary of the Fungi. 10th ed. Wallingford: CABI International. 2008. 485 p.
KIRK PM, NARDON ER, AKERS M. Becoulet Resonant magnetic perturbation experiments on MAST using external and internal coils for ELM control. Nucl. Fusion. 2010, 50(03):01-09.
LODGE DJ, AMMIRATI JF, O’DELL TE, MUELLER GM, HUHNDORF SM, WANG CJ, STOKLAND JN, SCHMIT JP, RYVARDEN L, LEACOCK PR, MATA M, UMAÑA L.; WU, Q.F.; CZEDERPILTZ, D.L. Terrestrial and Lignicolous Macrofungi. Biodiversity of Fungi: Inventory and Monitoring Methods, 2004; 22 (1): 127–172.
LODGE DJ. AND S. CANTRELL. Fungal communities in wet tropical forests: variation in time and space. Can. J. Bot. v. 73, p.1391–1398, 1996.
LODGE DJ, HAWKSWORTH DL, AND BJ RITCHIE. 1996. Microbial Diversity and Tropical Forest Functioning. In: ORIANS, G. H., DIRZO R., AND J. H. CUSHMAN (Ed.) Biodiversity and Ecosystem Processes in Tropical Forests. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Germany.
LAZAROTTO DC, PUTZKE J, SILVA ER, PASTORINI LH, PELEGRIN CMG, PRADO GR, CARGNELUTTI D. Comunidade de fungos Agaricomycetes em diferentes sistemas florestais no nordeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil: Floresta Estacional Decídua e monocultura de eucalipto. Revista Hoehnea. 2014;41(2): 269-275.
MAIA, L.C.; CARVALHO J.R.A.A. Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. Catálogo de plantas e fungos do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro, 2010; 1 (1): 90-261.
MENDOZA AYG, SANTANA RS, SANTOS VS, LIMA RA. Diversidade de Basidiomycota na Reserva Natural de Palmari, Amazonas, Brasil. Revista Gestão & Sustentabilidade Ambiental. 2018; 7 (4): 324-340.
MITTERMEIER RA, MITTERMEIER CG, BROOKS TM, PILGRIM JD, KONSTANT WR, FONSECA GAB, KORMOS C. Wilderness and Biodiversity Conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2003.
MONCALVO JM, RYVARDEN L. A nomenclatural Study of the Ganodermataceae Donk. Synopsis Fungorum. Fungiflora, 1997. Oslo.
MOORE D, ROBSON GD, TRINCI APJ. century guidebook to fungi with CD. University of Manchester, Manchester, England, 2011.
MOORE D, FRAZER L. Essential Fungal Genetics. New York: Springer 2002.
MUELLER, G.M.; HUHNDORF, S.M.; WANG, C.J.; STOKLAND, J.N.; SCHMIT, J.P.; RYVARDEN, L.; LEACOCK, P.R.; MATA, M.; UMAÑA, L.; WU, Q.F.; CZEDERPILTZ, D.L. Terrestrial and Lignicolous Macrofungi. Biodiversity of Fungi: Inventory and Monitoring Methods. 2004; 1 (1): 127–172.
OLIVEIRA LA, FERNANDES OC, JESUS MA, BENTES JLS, ANDRADE SL, SOUZA AQL, SANTOS C. In: Anais... Diversidade Microbiana da Amazônia [Internet] 2015. Editora INPA.
PAN H, JIN-FENG YU, YUE-MING WU, TIAN-YU ZHANG. Diversity analysis of soil dematiaceous hyphomycetes from the Yellow River source area. Journal of Zehejiang University Science B, Hangzhou, 2008; 9 (10): 829-834.
PEGLER, D.N. A preliminary agarici Flora of East Africa. Kew Bulletin. Additional Series, 1977; 6 (1): 1- 615.
PIEDADE MTF, JUNK W, D’ÂNGELO AS, WITTMANN F, SCHÖNGART J, BARBOSA KMN, LOPES A. Aquatic herbaceous plants of the Amazon floodplains: state of the art and research needed. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia, 2010; 22(1):165-178.
PRANCE GT. Estudos sobre vegetação das Campinas Amazônicas. I. Introdução a uma série de publicações sobre a vegetação amazônica de Campinas. Acta Amazonica. 1975; 5 (1): 207- 209.
RESENDE M, CURI N, SANTANA DP. Pedologia e fertilidade do solo: interações e aplicações. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Educação; Lavras: ESAL; Piracicaba: POTAFOS, 1988. 81 p.
RYVARDEN L. Genera of Polypores - Nomenclature and Taxonomy. Synopsis Fungorum. Fungiflora, 1991. Oslo.
RYVARDEN, L. Neotropical Polypores. Part 1. Synopsis Fungorum 19, Fungiflora, 2004, Oslo.
RYVARDEN, L.; GILBERTSON, R.L. European Polypores. Fungiflora, Oslo. 1997; 2 (1): 394-743.
SAMUELSSON J, GUSTAFSSON L, INGELÖG T. Dying and dead trees – a review of their importance for biodiversity. Swedish Threatened Species Unit, 1994 Uppsala.
SERRA EF. Biodiversidade de macromicetos da região sul do Rio Grande do Sul. [Dissertation] Pelotas: Universidade Federal de Pelotas. 2017, p. 62.
SINGER R. The Agaricales in modern taxonomy. 3th Edition, Vaduz. J.Cramer, Stuttgart, Germany. 912pp. 1975.
SINGER R. The Agaricales in Modern Taxonomy. 4th ed. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein, 1986.
URCELAY C, URCELAY C, ROBLEDO G. MULTIDISCIPLINARIO I, VEGETAL DB, CÓRDOBA UND. Community structure of polypores (Basidiomycota) in Andean alder wood in Argentina: Functional groups among wood ‐ decay fungi. Community structure of polypores (Basidiomycota) in Andean alder wood in Argentina: Functional groups among wood-decay f. Austral Ecology, 2004; 29(2): 471–476.
WILSON AW, DESJARDIN DE. Phylogenetic relationhips in the gymnopoid and marasmioid fungi (Basidiomycetes, euagarics clade). Mycologia. 2005 ;97 (1): 667-679.
Published
Versions
- 2022-01-14 (2)
- 2021-04-22 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
