UFSM-CS goes to school 2017
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X35535Keywords:
UFSM-CS, Engineering and Architecture, High schoolAbstract
The Federal University of Santa Maria - Cachoeira do Sul Campus began its activities in 2014 with five graduate courses: Architecture and Urbanism; Agricultural Engineering; Electrical Engineering; Mechanical Engineering; and Transport and Logistics Engineering. The need of technological professionals to meet regional and national demand was considered at the UFSM-Cachoeira do Sul (UFSM-CS) conception. However, the population of Cachoeira do Sul and nearby cities do not know about the courses offered by UFSM-CS. In order to alleviate this problem, the program UFSM-CS goes to Schools is in operation, whose main objective is to present the courses offered by UFSM-CS to high school students in public and private schools. This project has been developed in two stages: in the first stage, a questionnaire about the previous knowledge of the school community about the UFSM campus is applied. In the second stage, a cycle of lectures in public and private schools to show the undergraduate courses in the Cachoeira do Sul campus is done and then a new questionnaire is applied to check if the lecture cycle has indeed encouraged these students to enter UFMS-CS and/or another institution. A statistical analysis of the data obtained through questionnaires is presented to support extension projects with the schools of Cachoeira do Sul and region. Results show that 80% of students intend to enter a higher education institution and 70% do not know which courses are provided by UFSM-CS. After the presentation of the seminars, 92% of the students told the seminars were enlightening.
Downloads
References
Portal UFSM-CS. Disponível em http://w3.ufsm.br/cachoeira/index.php/institucional/ufsm-cs/historico.
Programa UFSM-CS vaí às Escolas 2017 – disponível em https://portal.ufsm.br/projetos/publico/projetos/view.html?idProjeto=56016.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
