SPATIAL ARRANGEMENT VALIDATION OF THE RICE STEM BUG IN FLOODED RICE FIELD

Authors

  • Juliano de Bastos Pazini Universidade Federal de Pelotas
  • Enio Júnior Seidel Universidade de Santa Maria
  • Fernando Felisberto da Silva Universidade Federal do Pampa
  • José Alexandre Freitas Barrigossi Embrapa Arroz e Feijão
  • José Francisco da Silva Martins Embrapa Clima Temperado
  • Robson Antonio Botta Universidade Federal de Pelotas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X22073

Keywords:

Tibraca limbativentris. Distribution. Oryza sativa.

Abstract

In order to spatial arrangement validation of Tibraca limbativentris Stal, 1860 (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in flooded rice field located at the “Planalto da Campanha” Region, Rio Grande do Sul (RS), Brazil, was carried out a study in flooded rice fields at Itaqui, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil, in the 2009/10, 2010/11 and 2011/12 harvests. Were established georeferenced grids for the samplings, totaling 81 points spaced ~50 m in the 2009/10 harvest and, 693 and 352 points in the 2010/11 and 2011/12 harvests, respectively, both with equidistant points ~10 m. Adults and nymphs samplings were performed on each point of the regular grids. We conducted a descriptive statistical analysis for the adults, nymphs and adults + nymphs variables by calculations the mean, standard deviation and minimum and maximum values and dispersion indices: variance/mean, Morisita index, k index, Green coefficient and Taylor potency. The rice stem bug spatial arrangement has been validated when the dispersion indices showed similar results. The rice stem bug T. limbativentris spatial arrangement in flooded rice is the aggregate type, regardless of the infestation level and life stage of the insect.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Juliano de Bastos Pazini, Universidade Federal de Pelotas

Departamento de Fitossanidade

Enio Júnior Seidel, Universidade de Santa Maria

Departamento de Estatística

Fernando Felisberto da Silva, Universidade Federal do Pampa

Campus de Itaqui

Robson Antonio Botta, Universidade Federal de Pelotas

Departamento de Microbiologia e Parasitologia

References

BOTTA, R. A. et al. Abundância sazonal de percevejo-do-colmo do arroz. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, v. 44, n. 4, p. 417-423, 2014.

BOTTON, M. et al. Biology of Tibraca limbativentris Stal on rice plants. Anais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil, v. 25, n. 1, p. 21-26, 1996.

CONAB (COMPANHIA NACIONAL DE ABASTECIMENTO). Acompanhamento de safra brasileira: grãos, décimo segundo levantamento, setembro 2015. Brasília: Conab, 2015. Disponível em: <http://www.conab.gov.br/OlalaCMS/uploads/arquivos/15_09_11_10_42_03_boletim_graos_setembro_2015.pdf>. Acesso em: 07 jan. 2015.

COSTA, E. C.; LINK, D. Dispersão de Tibraca limbativentris Stal, 1860 (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) em arroz irrigado. Anais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil. Londrina, v. 21, n. 1, p. 197-202, 1992.

COSTA, M. G.; BARBOSA, J. C.; YAMAMOTO, P. T. Distribuição de probabilidade de ocorrência de Orthezia praelonga Douglas (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Ortheziidae) na cultura de citros. Neotropical Entomology, v. 35, n. 3, p. 395-401, 2006.

COSTA, M. G.; BARBOSA, J. C.; YAMAMOTO, P. T. Planos de amostragem seqüenciais para Orthezia praelonga Douglas (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha, Ortheziidae) na cultura de citros. Neotropical Entomology, v. 36, n. 6, p. 932-938, 2007.

COSTA, M. G. et al. Spatial distribution of Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in citrus orchards. Scientia Agricola, v. 67, n. 5, p. 546-554, 2010.

COUNCE, P. A.; KEISLING, T. C.; MITCHELL, A. J. A uniform, objective, and adaptative system for expressing rice development. Crop Science, v. 40, p. 436-443, 2000.

DINARDO-MIRANDA, L. L. et al. Uso de geoestatística na avaliação da distribuição espacial de Mahanarva fimbriolata em cana-de-açúcar. Bragantia, v. 66, n. 3, p. 449-455, 2007.

ELLIOTT, J. M. Some methods for the statistical analysis of sample benthic invertebrates. 2.ed. Ambleside: Freshwater Biological Association, 1979. 157p.

GREEN R. H. Measurement of non–randomness in spatial distributions. Researches on Population Ecology, v. 8, n. 1, p. 1-7, 1966.

KARIMZADEH, R. et al. Analysis of the spatio-temporal distribution of Eurygaster integriceps (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae) by using spatial analysis by distance indices and geostatistics. Environmental Entomology, v. 40, n. 5, p. 1253-1265, 2011.

MARTINS, G. L. M. et al. Distribuição espacial de Calacarus heveae feres na cultura da seringueira em Marinópolis - São Paulo. Revista Árvore, v. 36, n. 2, p. 211-217, 2012.

MELO, E. P. de et al. Distribuição espacial de plantas infestadas por Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) na cultura do milho. Neotropical Entomology, v. 35, n. 5, p. 689-697, 2006.

MYERS, J. H. Selecting a measure of dispersion. Environmental Entomology, v. 7, n. 5, p. 619-621, 1978.

NICKELE, M. A. et al. Distribuição espacial de formigueiros de Acromyrmex crassispinus (Forel) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) em plantios de Pinus taeda. Neotropical Entomology, v. 39, n. 6, p. 862-872, 2010.

PAZINI, J. de B.; BOTTA, R. A.; SILVA, F. F. da. Mortalidade de percevejo-do-colmo do arroz no preparo do solo para cultivo mínimo. Pesquisa Agropecuária brasileira, v. 47, n. 7, p. 1022-1024, 2012.

PAZINI, J. de B. et al. Geoestatística aplicada ao estudo da distribuição espacial de Tibraca limbativentris em arrozal irrigado por inundação. Ciência Rural, v. 45, n. 6, p. 1006-1012, 2015.

R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM. R - A language and environment for statistical computing. ver. 2.15.0. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2011. Disponível em: .

RABINOVICH, J. E. Introducción a la ecología de poblaciones animales. México: Compania editorial continental, 1980. 313 p.

REUNIÃO TÉCNICA DA CULTURA DO ARROZ IRRIGADO, 30., 2014, Bento Gonçalves. Arroz irrigado: recomendações técnicas da pesquisa para o Sul do Brasil. Santa Maria: SOSBAI, 2014. 192p.

REAY-JONES, F. P. F. et al. Spatial dynamics of stink bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) and associated boll injury in southeastern cotton fields. Environmental Entomology, v. 39, n. 3, p. 959-969, 2010.

RIBEIRO, R. et al. Dispersão de Fidicinoides sp. (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) em cafeeiro. Científica, v. 34, n. 2, p. 263-268, 2006.

RODRIGUES, T. R.; FERNANDES, M. G.; SANTOS, H. R. dos. Distribuição espacial de Aphis gossypii (Glover) (Hemiptera, Aphididae) e Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) biótipo B (Hemiptera, Aleyrodidae) em algodoeiro Bt e não-Bt. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, v. 54, n. 1, p. 136-143, 2010.

SILVA, J. F. da et al. Distribuição espacial do pulgão preto em feijão de corda e cálculo do número de amostras. Revista Ciência Agronômica, v. 45, n. 3, p. 537-542, 2014a.

SILVA, V. et al. Distribuição espacial da cigarrinha Empoasca kraemeri Ross & Moore (Hemiptera: Cicadelidae) no feijão-de-corda e cálculo do número de amostras. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico, v. 81, n. 4, p. 335-341, 2014b.

SILVEIRA NETO, S. et al. Manual de ecologia dos insetos. São Paulo: Agronômica Ceres, 1976. 419p.

SOUZA, L. A. et al. Spatial Distribution of Euschistus heros (F.) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in soybean. Neotropical Entomology, v. 42, n. 4, p. 412-418, 2013.

TAYLOR, L. R. Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature, v. 189, n. 4766, p. 732-735, 1961.

TOLEDO, F.; BARBOSA, J. C.; YAMAMOTO, P. T. Distribuição espacial de Toxoptera citricida (Kirkaldy) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) na cultura de citros. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, v. 28, n. 2, p. 194-198, 2006.

Downloads

Published

2017-05-23

How to Cite

Pazini, J. de B., Seidel, E. J., Silva, F. F. da, Barrigossi, J. A. F., Martins, J. F. da S., & Botta, R. A. (2017). SPATIAL ARRANGEMENT VALIDATION OF THE RICE STEM BUG IN FLOODED RICE FIELD. Ciência E Natura, 39(2), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X22073

Issue

Vol. 39 No. 2 (2017)

Section

Statistics

License

To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.

 

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 

Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Most read articles by the same author(s)