Identificação de Clones de Batata com Potencial para Mesa e Adaptados para os Cultivos de Outono e Primavera do Rio Grande do Sul
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X9833Abstract
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is an important horticultural cropin the Rio Grande do Sul state, they are cultivated in two growing seasons,but with low yield. The tablestock is the predominant market and newcultivars should have high yield potential and good appearance to beaccepted by growers. Clonal evaluation determines its potential either asprogenitors in the breeding program or as new cultivars. The objective wasto identify potato clones with high yield, good tuber appearance andtablestock potential and adapted to two growing seasons. The clonesSMINIA90244-1, SMINIAIporã, SMINIA95043-11, SMINIA93057-1,Dakota Rose, SMIE040-6RY, SMIF165-6RY and the check cultivar Macacawere evaluated during autumn and spring of 2003 and autumn of 2004. Theexperiment was carried out in a randomized block design with fourreplications. In the average of three growing seasons, the clonesSMINIA90244-1, SMINIAIporã and the cultivar Macaca had the highesttotal yield, which is highly desirable for new cultivars. All evaluated cloneshad acceptable tuber appearance. The clone SMINIA90244-1 shared highyield and tuber number per hill and good tuber appearance. In the averageof three growing seasons, SMINIA90244-1 had tuber yield 19% higherthan the check cultivar Macaca, which should be an option as new cultivarto attend the tablestock market of Rio Grande do Sul.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
