Germinação in Vitro de Sementes de Mogango (cucurbita pepo l.) - cucurbitaceae
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X9673Abstract
An increase in osmotic pressure reduces the free energy of waterthrough an increase in solute concentration. The objective of this study wasto verify the effect of reduced osmotic pressure in in vitro germination ofsquash (Cucurbita pepo). Seed disinfestation was done with by an immersionin alcohol 70% for three min, washing three times with sterile distilled water,immersion in a solution of NaOCl (2.5%) for 10, 20, 30 or 40 min, and washingthree times with sterile distilled water. The culture medium was distilled waterand agar (7 g L-1), pH adjusted to 5.7. The concentrations of 0, 10, 20 or 30 g L-1 ofsucrose were used to increase osmotic pressure in the medium. A completerandom design was used with five replications of 10 seeds. The germinationindex, average time for germination day, germination energy of Baldwin, andgermination rate of viable seeds were evaluated. The osmotic pressure of 20and 30 g L-1 of sucrose in the culture medium showed the highest index ofgermination. The reduction of osmotic pressure do not increase the in vitrogermination percentage of squash seeds.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
