THE PERCEPTION AND COGNITION OF CLIMATE OF AGRICULTURISTS AND RESEARCHERS AS SUBSIDY TO THE CULTIVATION OF ROSES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X9603Keywords:
Climate perception, Farmer roses, Climate conditions, Rio Grande do Sul.Abstract
The State of Rio Grande do Sul stands out, for decades, the national agricultural scenario, and even internationally for its high capacity anddiversity of agricultural production, among them, could not fail to highlight the flowers, the rose being the main flower grown and marketedin the state and national scenarios. In this sense, the climate being one of the main constraints to its cultivation, this study concerns to investigatethe perception of climate farmer roses, analyzing if the climatic conditions of Rio Grande do Sul have been favorable or unfavorableto the cultivation of roses. Were also interviewed technical people, whose purpose of crossing with the empirical scientific data collectedfrom the farmers. Were carried out fieldwork with questionnaires, and demonstrated the great knowledge by both technicians and farmers.What is striking is that both groups were asked the same questions of respondents, but in a different way, respecting your vocabulary, gettingin the end, similar responses, both in relation to the analysis of the plant and on the climate of Rio Grande do Sul. Overall, according tothe empirical view of farmers, the climate of Rio Grande do Sul, as well as its region of production, can be framed from regular to goodconditions for the cultivation of roses.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
