Comparative study of energy balance in urban and forest areas in Central Amazonia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X80263Keywords:
Energy balance, Turbulent fluxes, UrbanizationAbstract
Data from two experimental sites in central Amazonia were used, one located in a forested region and the other in an urban region. The values of the radiation and energy balance components were measured at both sites. The observed components of the radiation balance in the forest, and urban areas were quite different. The city, the radiative (albedo and emissivity) and thermal (absorptivity) parameters of the surface produced greater reflection of solar radiation and emission of longwave radiation. Urban pollution reduced the incident solar radiation and increased the longwave radiation emitted by the atmosphere. The energy balance presented marked differences in the partition between sensible and latent heat flux between forest and city. In the forest, much of the available energy is converted into latent heat flux, due to the process of evapotranspiration. Whereas, in the city, energy is equally divided into sensible and latent heat fluxes.
Downloads
References
ANDREAE, M.; ACEVEDO, O.; ARAÚJO, A.; ARTAXO, P.; BARBOSA, C.; BARBOSA, H.; BRITO, J.; CARBONE, S.; CHI, X.; CINTRA, B. et al. The amazon tall tower observatory (atto) in the remote amazon basin: overview of first results from ecosystem ecology, meteorology, trace gas, and aerosol measurements. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discuss, v. 15, n. 18, p. 11599-11726, 2015.
AUBINET, M.; VESALA, T.; PAPALE, D. Eddy covariance: a practical guide to measurement and data analysis. [S.l.]: Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
AYOADE, J. O. Introdução à climatologia para os trópicos. [S.l.]: Difel, 1986.
BARLOW, J. F. Progress in observing and modeling the urban boundary layer. Urban Climate, Elsevier, v. 10, p. 216–240, 2014.
CARVALHO, D. L. R.; SOARES, C. B. S. da S.; SILVA, M. M. da. Identificação de ilhas de calor urbana na cidade de Manaus-am. Anais XVI Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto-SBSR, Foz do Iguaçu, PR, Brasil, v. 13, p. 0874–0881, 2013.
SILVA JUNIOR, J. de A.; COSTA, A. C. L. da; PEZZUTI, J. C. B.; COSTA, R. F. da; GALBRAITH, D. Análise da distribuição espacial do conforto térmico da cidade de Belém PA, no período menos chuvoso. Revista Brasileira de Geografia Física, v. 5, n. 2, p. 218–232, 2012.
MONCRIEFF, J.; MASSHEDER, J.; BRUIN, H. D.; ELBERS, J.; FRIBORG, T.; HEUSINKVELD, B.; KABAT, P.; SCOTT, S.; SOEGAARD, H.; VERHOEF, A. A system to measure surface fluxes of momentum, sensible heat, water vapour and carbon dioxide. Journal of Hydrology, Elsevier, v. 188, p.589–611, 1997.
NASCIMENTO, J. P., BELA, M. M., MELLER, B. B., BANDUCCI, A. L., RIZZO, L. V., VARA-VELA, A. L., BARBOSA, H. M. J., GOMES, H., RAFEE, S. A. A., FRANCO, M. A., CARBONE, S., CIRINO, G. G., SOUZA, R. A. F., MCKEEN, S. A., ARTAXO, P. Aerosols from anthropogenic and biogenic sources and their interactions–modeling aerosol formation, optical properties, and impacts over the central Amazon basin. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, v. 21, n. 9, p. 6755-6779, 2021.
OKE, T. R.; MILLS, G.; CHRISTEN, A.; VOOGT, J. A. Urban climates. [S.l.]: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
ROTH, M. Review of atmospheric turbulence over cities. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Wiley Online Library, v. 126, n. 564, p. 941–990, 2000.
SOUZA, D. O.; ALVALÁ, R. C. dos S. Observational evidence of the urban heat island of Manaus city, brazil. Meteorological Applications, Wiley Online Library, v. 21, n. 2, p. 186–193, 2014.
SOUZA, D. O.; ALVALÁ, R. C. dos S.; NASCIMENTO, M. G. do. Urbanization effects on the microclimate of Manaus: A modeling study. Atmospheric Research, Elsevier, v. 167, p. 237–248, 2016.
VON RANDOW, C.; MANZI, A. O.; KRUIJT, B.; OLIVEIRA, P. D.; ZANCHI, F. B.; SILVA, R. d.; HODNETT, M. G.; GASH, J. H.; ELBERS, J. A.; CARDOSO, F. L. et al. Comparative measurements and seasonal variations in energy and carbon exchange over forest and pasture in south west amazonia. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, Springer, v. 78, n. 1, p. 5–26, 2004.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.