Cultivation of Tagetes patula L. in copper contaminated soils
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X74452Keywords:
Phytoremediation, Marigolds, Crop tolerance factorsAbstract
Leaf quality is one of the most valued commercial parameters in the cultivation of flowers and ornamental plants in vases, with soil or substrate conditions playing a fundamental role in its successful practice. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the vegetative development of marigold (Tagetes patula L.) cultivated in soils contaminated by Cu, seeking to verify its soil phytoremediation potential for an agriculture with low environmental impact. The experiment took place in a greenhouse, using a completely randomized, 5x2 factorial design (added levels of Cu in the soil: 0 (no addition: control), 250, 500, 750 and 1,000 mg kg-1 of copper sulfate and soil pH corrections: 5.5 and 6.0, according to soil analysis report), with five replications. This work evaluated phytotechnical parameters and translocation factors, bioaccumulation, bioconcentration and Cu extraction rate in plants. It was observed that the development of marigold plants was similar on both soil pH corrections according to the addition of Cu, affecting the aesthetic quality of the plants. In this context, it is concluded that the marigold species is tolerant to the cultivation in soils with excess Cu and is characterized as a Cu extracting plant, with low soil phytoremediation potential.
Downloads
References
Alvares, C. A., Stape, J. L., Sentelhas, P. C., Gonçalves, J. L. M. & Sparovek, G. (2013). Koppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 22(1), 711-728, 2013. doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507
Andreazza, R. L., Bortolon, L., Pieniz, S., Bento, F. M. & Camargo, F. A. O. (2015). Evaluation of two Brazilian indigenous plants for phytostabilization and phytore¬mediation of copper-contaminated soils. Brazil Journal Biological, 75(4), 868-877, doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.01914 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.01914
Bellé, R. A. (2000). Caderno Didático de Floricultura. Santa Maria: UFSM.
Caille, N., Zhao, F. J. & Mcgrath, S. P. (2005). Comparison of root absorption, translo- cation and tolerance of arsenic in the hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata and the no- nhyperaccumulartor Pteris tremula. New Phytologist, 165(1), 755-761. doiI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01239.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01239.x
Ferreira, D. F. (2014). Sisvar: A guide for its bootstrap procedures in multiple comparisons. Ciência e Agro¬tecnologia, 38(2), 109-112. doi: 10.1590/S1413-70542014000200001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542014000200001
Garcia, G., Faz, A. & Cunna, M. (2004). Performance of Piptatherum miliaceum (Smilo grass) in edaphic Pb and Zn phytoemediation over a short growth period. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 54(2-3), 245-250. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2004.06.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2004.06.004
Gomes, B. C. V., Kummer, G., Pereira, M. M. D. S. M., Izário Filho, H. J., Salazar, R. F. Dos S. & Vasconcellos, N. J. S. (2016). Toxicological potential of metals found in soil of cemeteries in Santa Maria-RS. Ambiente & Água, 11(1), 145-155. doi: 10.4136/ambi-agua.1723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4136/ambi-agua.1723
Gonçalves-Júnior, A. C., Carvalho, E. A. Coelho, G. F. Schwantes, D., Nacke, H. & Moraes, A. J. (2013). Disponibilidade de nutrientes e elementos potencial- mente tóxicos para as plantas de hissopo em solo arenoso sob adubação mineral e orgânica. Scientia Agraria Paranaensis, 12(2), 105-114. doi:10.1818/sap.v12i2.6451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18188/1983-1471/sap.v12n2p105-114
Mackie, K. A., Müller, T. & Kandeler, E. (2012). Remediation of copper in vineyards e A mini review. Journals Environmental Pollution, 167(1), 16-26. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2012.03.023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2012.03.023
Mainardi, J. C. C. T., Bellé, R. A. & Mainardi, L. (2004). Produção de crisântemo (Dendranthema grandiflora Tzvelev.) ‘Snowdon’ em vaso II: ciclo da cultivar, comprimento, largura e área da folha. Ciência Rural, 34(6), 1709-1714. doi: 10.1590/S0103-84782004000600007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782004000600007
Marques, M., Aguiar, C. R. C. & Silva, J. J. L. S. (2011). Desafios, técnicas e barreiras sociais, econômicas e regulatórias na fitorremediação de solos contaminados. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 35(1), 1-11. doi: 10.1590/S0100-06832011000100001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832011000100001
Marsola, T., Miyazawa, M. & Pavan, M. A. (2005). Acumulação de cobre e zinco em tecidos do feijoeiro em relação com o extraído do solo. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 9(1), 92–98. doi:10.1590/S1415-43662005000100014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662005000100014
Menegaes, J. F., Backes, F. A. A. L., Bellé, R. A., Swarowsky, A. & Salazar, R. F. S. (2017). Avaliação do potencial fitorremediador de crisântemo em solo com excesso de cobre. Ornamental Horticulture, 23(1), 63-71. doi:10.14295/oh.v23i1.915. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14295/oh.v23i1.915
Menegaes, J. F., Swarowsky, A., Bellé, R. A. & Backes, F. A. A. L. (2019). Avaliação do potencial fitorremediador de cravina-chinesa cultivada em solo com excesso de cobre. Revista em Agronegócio e Meio Ambiente, 12(4), 1353-1370. doi:10.17765/2176-9168.2019v12n4p1353-1370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17765/2176-9168.2019v12n4p1353-1370
Menegaes, J. F., Swarowsky, A., Bellé, R. A. & Backes, F. A. A. L. (2020). Desenvolvimento e potencial fitorremediador de espécies florícolas em resposta ao excesso de cobre no solo. Revista em Agronegócio e Meio Ambiente, 13(3), 1163-1183. doi: 10.17765/2176-9168.2020v13n3p1163-1183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17765/2176-9168.2020v13n3p1163-1183
Mertens, J., Luyssaert, S. & Verheyen, K. (2005). Use and abuse of trace metal concentrations in plant tissue for biomonitoring and phytoextraction. Environmental Pollution, 138(1), 1-4. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2005.01.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2005.01.002
Nachtigall, G. R., Nogueirol, R. C. & Alleoni, L. R. F. (2007). Formas de cobre em solos de vinhedos em função do pH e da adição de cama-de-frango. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 42(3), 427-434. doi: 10.1590/s0100-204x2007000300017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2007000300017
Oorts, K. (2013). Copper. In: Alloway, B. J. (ed.). Heavy metals in soils. Environmental Pollution. (pp. 1-28). Dordrecht: Springer.
Salazar, R. F. S., Alcântara, M. A. K. D. & Izário Filho, H. J. (2011). Evaluation of sample preparation methods and optimization of nickel determination in vegetable tissues. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 35(1), 241-248. doi: 10.1590/S0100-06832011000100022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832011000100022
Sonmez, S. S., Kaplani, M., Sonmez, N. K. & Kaya, H., Uzi, I. (2006). High level of Copper application to soil and leaves reduce the growth and yield of tomato plants. Scientia Agricola, 63(3), 213-218. doi: 10.1590/S0103-90162006000300001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162006000300001
Sun, Y., Zhou, Q. & Dia O, C. (2008). Effects of cadmium and arsenic on growth and metal accumulation of Cd hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L. Bioresource Technolology, 99(1),1103-1110. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.02.035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.02.035
Tavares, S. R., Oliveira, S. A. & Camargo, C. M. (2013). Avaliação de espécies na fitorremediação de solos contaminados por metais pesados. Revista Holos, 5(1), 80-97. doi: 10.15628/holos.2013.1852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15628/holos.2013.1852
Xia, Y. & Shen, G. (2007). Comparative studies of copper tolerance and uptake by three plant species of the genus elsholtzia. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 79(1), 53-57. doi: 10.1007/s00128-007-9222-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-007-9222-7
Yoon, J., Cao, X., Zhou, Q. & Ma, L. Q. (2006). Accumulation of Pb, Cu, and Zn in native plants growing on a contaminated Florida site. Science of the Total Environment, 368(1), 456-464. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.01.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.01.016
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ciência e Natura

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.