Carbon dioxide concentration in the savannah Amazon: a case study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X53214Keywords:
CO2, Meteorological variables, WaveletsAbstract
To investigate the correlation between two time series (CO2 versus air temperature and wind speed), we used coherency wavelets and phase angle. The datasets used in this study are in the October 16 of 2018, measured from micrometeorological tower in savanna natural area (2°49’30”S; 54°54’35”W; 82 m a.m.s.l.), Santarém (PA). The correlation between with CO2 concentration and air temperature detected high coherence (upper 0.8). When confronted with the wind speed, in microscale, detection a chaotic and disordered region, displaying very intermittent and showed “islands” (statistically significant), justified by the low amplitude between them. Naturally, the use of coherence wavelet and phase is fundamental to emphasize the between with CO2 and meteorological variables ration. It is evident, even for one day only, anti-phase relation between with the CO2 and air temperature signals. The temporal domain less than 32 minutes (microscale), the wind speed, at some moments, exerts a strong influence on the concentration of the referred gas (> 0.8), mainly from 09 to 15 local time.
Downloads
References
ALVARES, C. A. STAPE, J. L.; SENTELHAS, P. C.; MORAES GONÇALVES, J. L.; SPAROVEK, G. Koppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, v. 22, n. 6, p. 711–728, 2013.
BARBOSA, A. C. B. Estudo da Variabilidade Acoplada Oceano-Atmosfera no Atlântico Tropical. 2007. 139 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Meteorologia). Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2007.
BLOOMFIELD, D. S.; McATEER, R. T. J.; LITES, B. W.; JUDGE, P. G.; MATHIOUDAKIS, M.; KEENAN, F. P. Wavelet phase coherence analysis: application to a quiet-sun magnetic element. The Astrophysical Journal, v. 617, p. 623–632, 2004.
COSTA, A. C. Fluxos de energia e CO2 em uma savana tropical no leste da Amazônia. 2019. 55 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Clima e Ambiente) – Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia/ Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, 2019.
FAUSTO, M. A. Análise de parâmetros biofísicos estimados pelo algoritmo SEBAL em áreas de Cerrado na bacia do alto Rio Paraguai. 2014. 62 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Física Ambiental) – Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, 2014.
GRINSTED, A.; MOORE, J. C.; JEVREJEVA, S. Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics. v. 11, p. 561–566, 2004.
JATI, S. R. Emissão de CO2 e CH4 nas savanas úmidas de Roraima. 2013. 66 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Biológicas). – Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia/ Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, 2013.
LEVY, P. E.; GRELLE, A.; LINDROTH, A.; MOLDER, M.; JARVIS, P. G.; KRUIJT, B.; MONCRIEFF, M. B. Regional scale CO2 fluxes over central Sweden by a boundary layer budget method. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. v. 98-99, p. 169–180. 1999.
RODRIGUES, T. E.; SANTOS, P. L.; OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, R. C.; VALENTE, M. A.; SILVA, J. M. L.; CARDOSO JÚNIOR, E. Q. Caracterização dos solos da área do planalto de Belterra, município de Santarém, Estado do Pará. Belém: EMBRAPA Amazônia Oriental, 2001. 54 p.
TORRENCE, C.; COMPO, G. P. A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, v.79, p. 61-78, 1998.
TORRENCE, C.; WEBSTER, P. J. Interdecadal Changes in the ENSO–Monsoon System. Journal of Climate, v. 12, p. 2679-2690, 1999.
VADREVU, K. P; CHOI, Y. Wavelet analysis of airborne CO2 measurements and related meteorological parameters over heterogeneous landscapes. Atmospheric Research. v. 102, n. 1-2, p. 77–90, 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.