Diagnosis of the Simplified Municipal Plan for Integrated Solid Waste Management in 16 small municipalities in the western region of the State of Paraná, Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X42101Keywords:
Municipal urban management, Small municipalities management, Urban solid wasteAbstract
Brazilian municipalities are responsible for the management of urban solid waste generated in their territories; When this management is performed improperly, it generates environmental, social, economic and health problems. The National Solid Waste Policy (PNRS) instituted the Simplified Municipal Plan for Integrated Solid Waste Management (PMSGIRS) for municipalities with less than 20,000 inhabitants. Thus, this article aims to diagnose PMSGIRS from 16 municipalities with less than 20,000 inhabitants in western region of Parana, verifying that they satisfactorily meet the PNRS content. For this, a checklist was prepared containing 282 items, by consulting the manuals of the Ministry of the Environment and Brazilian Laws on the subject. As a result, it was found that only one municipality does not have its PMSGIRS and another has the Intermunicipal Plan for Integrated Solid Waste Management, four have Municipal Basic Sanitation Plan that includes the solid waste axis and only ten have PMSGIRS. Most plans (78%) do not satisfactorily meet the PNRS content, achieving less than 70% of the required content. Only three plans (22%) obtained a rate considered satisfactory. It is concluded that these plans should be urgently reviewed, with a view to including missing content.
Downloads
References
ABRELPE – ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE EMPRESAS DE LIMPEZA PÚBLICA E RESIDUOS ESPECIAIS. Panorama dos resíduos sólidos no Brasil: 2018. [Internet]. São Paulo: Abrelpe; 2018 [cited 2020 Jan 24] Availablefrom: http://www.abrelpe.org.br/Panorama/panorama2018.pdf
BRASIL; Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Gestão integrada de resíduos sólidos na Amazônia: a metodologia e os resultados da sua aplicação. Brasília (Brasil): Ministério do Meio Ambiente, 2005.
BRASIL; Secretaria de Recurso Hídrico e Ambiente Urbano; Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Guia para elaboração dos Planos de Gestão de Resíduos Sólidos. Brasília (Brasil): SRHU/MMA, 2011.
BRASIL; Secretaria de Recursos Hídricos e Ambiente Urbano. Orientações para elaboração de Plano Simplificado de Gestão Integrada de Resíduos Sólidos: PSGIRS para municípios com população inferior a 20 mil habitantes. Brasília (Brasil): SRHU, 2016.
BRASIL; Secretaria de Recursos Hídricos e Ambiente Urbano. Planos de gestão de resíduos sólidos: manual de orientação. Brasília (Brasil): SRHU, 2012.
CETRULO T, MARQUES RC, CETRULO NM, PINTO FS. Effectiveness of solid waste policies in developing countries: A case study in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018; 205(20):179-187.
COSTA SL. Gestão Integrada de Resíduos Sólidos Urbanos: aspectos jurídicos e ambientais. Aracaju - Se: Evocati; 2011.
DALL’AGNOL ALB, LOEBENS L, DEMARCO CF, ARAUJO MMF, LEANDRO D, CASTRO AS, et al. The perception of municipal manager on the management of urban solid waste. Ciência e Natura. 2019; 31(19):01-08.
DECRETO nº 7.404, de 23 de dezembro de 2010. Lex: Regulamenta a Lei nº 12.305. Diário Oficial da União (Brasília) 2010 Ago 02.
FONSECA SA. Planos municipais de gestão integrada de resíduos sólidos: Mito ou Realidade? Revista Brasileira de Desenvolvimento Territorial Sustentável. 2015; 1(1):106-122.
GENTA TMS, MAURÍCIO AA, MATIOLI G. Avaliação das boas práticas através de "check-list" aplicado em restaurantes "self-service" da região central de Maringá, estado do Paraná. Acta Sci Health Sci. 2005; 27(2):151-6.
GOUVEIA, N. Resíduos sólidos urbanos: impactos socioambientais e perspectiva de manejo sustentável com inclusão social. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 2012;6(17):1503-1510.
IBGE - INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA. Pesquisa de Informações Básicas Municipais: Perfil dos Municípios Brasileiros. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2014 [cited 2020 Jan 24] Available from: ftp://ftp.ibge.gov.br/Perfil_Municipios/2013/munic2013.pdf
JACOBI PR, BEZEN GR. Gestão de resíduos sólidos em São Paulo: desafios da sustentabilidade. Estudos Avançados. 2011;25(71):135-158.
LEI nº 12.305, de 02 de agosto de 2010. Lex: Institui a Política Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos. Brasília, DF, 2010a.
MENDEZ GP, MAHLER CF. Evolution of integrated solid waste management systems in Brazilian cities under the national solid waste management. Ciência e Natura. 2018;40(11).
MORAES JL. Os planos municipais de gestão integrada de resíduos sólidos e sua implantação em municípios da região centro sul do Ceará [thesis]. Rio Claro: Departamento de Geografia/Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas da Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”; 2017.
OLIVEIRA TB, GALVÃO JUNIOR AC. Planos municipais de gestão integrada de resíduos sólidos. In: TONETO JUNIOR R, SAIANI CCS, DOURADO, J. (Org.) Resíduos Sólidos no Brasil: oportunidades e desafios da Lei Federal nº 12.305 (Lei de Resíduos Sólidos). 1st ed. São Paulo: Manole, 2014.
PARANÁ; Instituto Ambiental do Paraná. Relatório da situação da disposição final de resíduos sólidos urbanos no estado do Paraná. Curitiba (Paraná): IAP, 2017.
PARANÁ; Secretaria de Meio Ambiente e Recursos Hídricos. Plano de Regionalização da Gestão Integrada de Resíduos Sólidos Urbanos do Estado do Paraná. Curitiba (Paraná): SMRH, 2013
PEREIRA TS, FERNANDINO G. Evaluation of solid waste management sustainability of a coastal municipality from northeastern Brazil. Ocean&Coastal Management. 2019;179(1):104839.
PINHO PM. Avaliação dos planos municipais de gestão integrada de resíduos sólidos urbanos na Amazônia Brasileira. [thesis]. São Paulo: Departamento de Ciências Ambientais/USP; 2011.
PUPIN PLF, BORGES ACG. Acertos e contradições na interpretação da lei 12.305/10 nos planos municipais de gestão integrada de resíduos sólidos da microrregião de Jaboticabal – SP. Ver. Nac. de Gerenc. de Cidades. 2015;03(15): 158-175.
Published
Versions
- 2022-04-21 (2)
- 2020-02-17 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
