Progeny selection of "Myrocarpus frondosus" for improved growth vigor of seedlings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X40872Keywords:
Early selection, Genetic gain, Seedling qualityAbstract
In this study, we aimed to evaluate half-sibling progenies of Myrocarpus frondosus based on morphological characteristics and to select seedlings with high growth vigor and quality. Seedlings were evaluated for shoot height and diameter, shoot height/diameter ratio, and number of leaves. The shoot height showed the highest estimations of linear correlation with the other characteristics. The linear correlation of shoot height between two consecutive evaluations was high from 60 days of cultivation, indicating that selection should be applied after this period. Selection of 101 seedlings within the best progenies resulted in a genetic gain of 15.13% for shoot height. The greatest indirect gain from selection was for the shoot height/diameter ratio, whereas the lowest indirect gain was for the stem diameter. Myrocarpus frondosus progenies can be selected for shoot height at 60 days of nursery cultivation, resulting in high direct gain for growth and indirect gain for stem height/diameter ratio.
Downloads
References
AZEVEDO LP DE A, COSTA RB da, MARTINEZ DT, TSUKAMOTO A de A, BRONDANI GE, BARETTA MC, et al. Seleção genética em progênies de Eucalyptus camaldulensis em área de cerrado matogrossense. Ciência Rural. 2015;45(11): 2001-2006.
CALEGARI L, GATTO DA, STANGERLIN DM, MARTINS SV, AGNES C. C.; DURLO MA. Caracterização de povoamentos de Myrocarpus frondosus M. Allemão na Região Central do Rio Grande do Sul. Revista Científica Eletrônica de Engenharia Florestal. 2009;14:18-28.
CANUTO DS de O, ZARUMA DUG, MORAES MA DE, SILVA AM da, MORAES MLT de, FREITAS MLM. Caracterização genética de um teste de progênies de Dipteryx alata Vog. proveniente de remanescente florestal da Estação Ecológica de Paulo de Faria, SP, Brasil. Hoehnea. 2015;42(4):641-648.
CARVALHO PER. Espécies Arbóreas Brasileiras. Brasília: EMBRAPA Informação Tecnológica. Colombo, PR: EMBRAPA Florestas. 2003;1:1039.
COSTA RB, MARTINEZ DT, CHICHORRO JF, BAUER M de O, CEZANA DP, SOUZA TR. Desempenho de progênies no pré-melhoramento de Tectona grandis L. f no Estado do Espírito Santo. Scientia Forestalis. 2015;43(105):211-216a.
COSTA RB, MARTINEZ DT, SILVA JC, ALMEIDA BC. Variabilidade e ganhos genéticos com diferentes métodos de seleção em progênies de Eucalyptus camaldulensis. Revista de Ciências Agrárias. 2015;58(1):69-74b.
COSTA RB, MARTINS JW, ROA RAR, RODRIGUES NB, TSUKAMOTO FILHO A de A. Variabilidade genética de procedências e progênies de erva-mate nativa (Ilex paraguariensis St. Hil.) no sudoeste do estado de Mato Grosso do Sul. Multitemas. 2011;39:7-21.
CRUZ CD, REGAZZI AJ, CARNEIRO PCS. Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético. 2004. 3.ed. Viçosa: UFV:480p.
CRUZ CD. GENES - A software package for analysis in experimental statistics and quantitative genetics. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy. 2013;35:271-276.
DUARTE RI, SILVA FALS, SCHULTZ J, SILVA JZ, REIS MS. Características de desenvolvimento inicial em teste de progênie de uma população de Araucária na flona de Três Barras - SC. Revista Biodiversidade Brasileira. 2012;2(2):114-123.
GONÇALVES JLM, SANTARELLI EG, MORAES NETTO SP de, MANARA MP, STAPE JL. Produção de mudas de espécies nativas: substrato, nutrição, sombreamento e fertilização. In: Gonçalves JLM, Benedetti V. (Ed.). Nutrição e fertilização florestal. Piracicaba: IPEF, 2005: 309-350.
GOUVÊA LRL, SILVA GAP, VERARDI CK, OLIVEIRA ALB, GONÇALVES ECP, SCALOPPI-JUNIOR EJ, et al. Rubber tree early selection for yield stability in time and among locations. Euphytica. 2013;191:365-373.
KUBOTA TYK, MORAES MA, SILVA ECB DA, PUPIN S, AGUIAR AV, MORAES MLT, et al. Variabilidade genética para caracteres silviculturais em progênies de polinização aberta de Balfourodendron riedelianum (Engler). Scientia Forestalis. 2015;43(106):407-415.
OTSUBO HCB, MORAES MLT, MORAES MA, NETO MJ, FREITAS MLM, COSTA RB, et al. Variação genética para caracteres silviculturais em três espécies arbóreas da região do Bolsão Sul-Mato-Grossense. Cerne. 2015;21(4):535-544.
PRATES FBS, LUCAS CSG, SAMPAIO RA, BRANDÃO JÚNIOR DS, FERNANDES LA, ZUBA JUNIOR GR. Crescimento de mudas de pinhão-manso em resposta a adubação com superfosfato simples e pó-de-rocha. Revista Ciência Agronômica. 2012;43(2):207-213.
RIO GRANDE DO SUL. Decreto Estadual n. 42.099, de 01 de janeiro de 2003. Lista final das espécies da flora ameaçadas - RS. Disponível em: http://www.fzb.rs.gov.br/upload/1396360713_flora_ameacada.pdf. Acess in 26 feb. 2018.
RITCHIE GA, LANDIS TD, DUMROESE RK, HAASE DL. Assessing plant quality seedling processing, storage, and outplanting. v. 7. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service. 2010:200.
ROSADO AM, ROSADO TB, RESENDE JÚNIOR MFR, BHERING LL, CRUZ CD. Ganhos genéticos preditos por diferentes métodos de seleção em progênies de Eucalyptus urophylla. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira. 2009;44(12):1653-1659.
SANTI II, GATTO DA, MACHADO MRG, SANTOS PSB dos, Freitag RA. Chemical Composition, Antioxidant and Antimi- crobial Activity of the Oil and Plant Extract Myrocarpus frondosus Allemão. American Journal of Plant Sciences,2017;8:1560-1571.
SHIMIZU JY. Estratégia complementar para conservação de espécies florestais nativas: resgate e conservação de ecótipos ameaçados. Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira. 2007;54:07-35.
SILVA AC da, ROSADO SC da S, VIEIRA CT, CARVALHO D de. Variação genética entre e dentro de populações de candeia (Eremanthus erythropappus (DC.) MacLeish). Ciência Florestal. 2007;17(3):271-277.
SILVA RF, SAIDELLES FLF, KEMERICH PDC, STEFFEN RB, SWAROWSKY A, SILVA AS. Crescimento e qualidade de mudas de Timbó e Dedaleiro cultivadas em solo contaminado por cobre. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental. 2012;16(8):881-886.
SILVA SS, PORDEUS RV, PEREIRA JO, NETO JD, BEZERRA JM. Estimativa de parâmetros genéticos do cajueiro anão precoce em um solo arenoso pelo procedimento reml/blup1. Revista Verde. 2013;8(3):41-51.
SILVA AR, RÊGO ER, PESSOA AMS, RÊGO MM. Correlation network analysis between phenotypic and genotypic traits of chili pepper. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 2016;51(4):372-377.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
