Variability of boundary layer processes for the metropolitan area of São Paulo during winter
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X36913Abstract
As variações espaciais e temporais da Camada Limite planetária (CLP) da Área Metropolitana da cidade de São Paulo (RMSP) durante o período de 23 de julho a 15 de Agosto de 1999 são estudas utilizando dados de um Sodar Doppler. RMSP (λ = 23º34’ S e φ = 46º44’ W) está numa altitude de 800 m acima do nível médio do mar, localizada 60 km à noroeste do oceano Atlântico, limitada por cadeias de montanhas ao norte, tendo uma orografia complexa e configura-se numa ilha de calor urbana.
Este trabalho tem o objetivo de entender o impacto da urbanização sobre os processos de CLP particularmente durante a estação de inverno. Um número de diferentes tipos de experimentos estiveram em operação durante uma campanha de inverno organizada pelo IAG-USP. O Sodar Doppler fornece dados sobre (i) função estrutura de temperatura, CT2, (ii) velocidade do vento horizontal, u, (iii) velocidade do vento vertical, w, (iv) desvios padrão do vento horizontal e vertical, σu, σv e σw, e (v) altura da inversão de temperatura, Zi.
A análise dos dados fornecidos pelo Sodar mostra claramente as variações desses parâmetros em alturas indo de 50 m até 1500 m com intervalos de 50 m num intervalo de tempo de 15 minutos. Existe grande variação desses parâmetros com a altura.
O aumento noturno no campo do vento horizontal com a altura é bem marcado indicando a quase ausência de transporte vertical de momento horizontal durante a noite em condições estáveis. Durante as horas da manhã a aceleração na velocidade do vento é evidente. O aumento anormal em Zi durante a noite sob condições estáveis prevalece durante o inverno com valores mais altos em agosto do que em julho.Downloads
References
Freitas, E. D., M. A. F. Silva Dias, K. N. Nair and P. L. Silva Dias, 1999: Use of Doppler Sodar in Atmospheric Measurements. Workshop on Physics of the Planetary Boundary Layer and Dispersion Process Modelling. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X36911
Santa Maria – RS, Brasil.
Gallo, C. P. and T. W. Owen, 1999: Satellite-Biased Adjustments for the Urban Heat Island Temperature Bias. J. Applied Meteorol., 38, 806-813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<0806:SBAFTU>2.0.CO;2
Little, C. G., 1969: Acoustic methods for the remote probing of the lower atmosphere. Proc. IEEE, 57, 571-578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1969.7010
Nair, K. N., P. K. Kunrikrishnan, K. S. Gupta and R. Ramachadran, 1989: Sudy of vertical wind and temperature turbulence in a convective boudary layer from Sodar observation at Thumba. Indian Journal of Radio & Space Physics, 18, 157-159.
Oke, T. R., 1973: City Size and the Urban Heat Island. Atmos. Environ., 7, 769-779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(73)90140-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
