Application and efficiency of vitrification and electrokinetic techniques in soil remediation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X33556Keywords:
Contamination, Pollution, ReviewAbstract
The improvement of remediation processes is necessary due to the impact caused by heavy metal ions and organic ionic compounds. Due to the lack of a universal method, several factors must be evaluated before choosing a technique. Vitrification and electrokinetics are soil remediation technologies that use the electrical potential to remediate. In vitrification the contaminant is immobilized in the soil, in electrokinetics, the contaminated material is separated from the soil. This bibliographical review had as main aim to approach vitrification and electrokinetics techniques in soils remediation. This review does not intend to exhaust the subject, but to approach the principles, application
forms, advantages, disadvantages, efficiency, costs, and the application of the most cited methods in the literature. Vitrification has proven to be a safe technique, easy to apply and with good efficiency, however highly expansive. Electrokinetics proved to be more economically workable, with a variety of applications and with high efficiency.
Downloads
References
ACAR YB, ALSHAWABKEH AN. Principles of electrokinetic remediation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1993;27:2638-2647.
ALSHAWABKEH AN, YEUNG AT, BRICKA MR. Practical aspects of in-situ electrochemical extraction. J. Environm. Eng. 1999;125:27-35.
BEHM E, GROSS M, QUESENBERRY D, VIPPERMAN D. In situ vitrification. Civil Engineering Dept, Virginia Tech, 1997.
BIELEFELDT AR. Stabilization and Solidification. Reading Notes. University of Colorado at Boulder, 2003.
BRAGATO M, TENÓRIO JAS. In-situ Chemical Oxidation of Soil Contaminated by Benzene, Lead and. Extraction, Processing, Structure and Properties Proceedings. Warrendale. Orlando: 2007.
BRASIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. CONAMA nº 420. Resolução nº 420. 28 de dezembro de 2009.
CHANG JH, CHENG SF. The remediation performance of a specific electrokinetic integrated with zero-valent metals for perchloroethylene contaminated soils. Journal of Hazourdous Materials. 2006;131:153-162.
DOS SANTOS EV. Aplicação de tratamentos eletroquímicos integrados para remediação de solos e águas contaminadas com petróleo e pesticidas [thesis]. Natal: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; 2015. 140 p.
DYMINSKI AS. Contaminação de solos e águas subterrâneas. 1st ed. UFPR; 2006.
FONINI A, ROJAS JWJ. Técnicas empregadas na remediação de solos contaminados. Associação Brasileira de Mecânica dos Solos e Engenharia Geotécnica. Anais II Geojovem [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2018 jul 09]. Available from: https://www.abms.com.br/links/bibliotecavirtual/IIgeojovem2006/2006-fonini-rojas.pdf.
HU N, LI Z, HUANG P, TAO C. Distribuition and mobility of metals in agricultural soils near a copper smelter in South China. Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 2006;28:19-26.
JACKMAN SA, MAINI G, SHARMAN KA, SUNDERLAND G, KNOWLES JC. Electrokinetic movement and biodegradation of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in silt soil. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2001;74:40-48.
LIU L, HAO RX, CHENG SY, GUO HC. Na Integrated Fe asibility Study on Designing Remediation Systems for Petroleum-Contaminated Sites: Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. 2004;156:83-95.
LOPEZ-VIZCAINO R, SAEZ C, CANIZARES P, RODRIGO MA. Electro coagulation of the effluents from surfactanaided soil-remediation processes. Separation and Purification Technology. 2012;98:88-93.
MATURI K, REDDY KR. Simultaneous removal of organic compounds and heavy metals from soils by electrokinetic remediation with a modified cyclodextrin. Chemosphere. 2006;63:1022-1031.
MEEGODA J, EZELDIN SA, FANG HY, INYANG H. Waste Immobilization Technologies. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management. 2003;07:1-13.
MENA E, RUIZ C, VILLASENOR J, RODRIGO MA, CANIZARES P. Biological permeable reactive barries coupled with electrokinetic soil flushing for the treatment of diesel-polluted clay soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2015; 283:131-139.
NETO FAO, SANTOS PRP, GOMES GLGC. Considerações sobre tecnologias para remediação de solos e águas subterrâneas contaminadas e suas aplicações em polos industriais na região metropolitana de Salvador e na antiga Fábrica da COBRAC em Santo Amaro-BA [monography]. São Paulo: Escola Politécnica/USP; 2000.
OSHA - Occupational Safety & Health Administration [Internet]. United States: Department of Labor, Epa/Labor Superfund Health & Safety Task Force [cited 1993 jun 28]. Osha Audits Of Superfund Sites From 1993 To 1993. Toxic and Hazardous Substances/Air contaminants 1997. [cited 2018 jul 09]. Available from: http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/hazardouswaste/sftaskrpt.html
PARNELL GS, FRIMPON M, BARNES J, KLOEBER JRJM, DECKRO RF, JACKSON JA. Safety Risk Analysis of an Innovative Environmental Technology. Risk Analysis. 2001;21:143-155.
RODRIGO MA, OTURAN N, OTURAN MA. Electrochemically Assisted Remediation of Pesticides in Soils and Water: A review. Chemical Reviews. 2014;114:8720-8745.
SAICHEK RE, REDDY KR. Effect of pH control at the anode for the electrokinetic removal of phenanthrene from kaolin soil. Chemosphere. 2003;51:273-287.
EPA – Environmental Protection Agency. United States: Environmental Protection Agency under EPA, FRTR (Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable). Abstracts of Remediation Case Studies and Technology Assessment – fact sheet. 2004;8:1-12.
USEPA - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [Internet]. A Citizen’s Guide to Vitrification. 2001. [cited 2018 jun 09] Available from: www.nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=10002SQR.TXT
USEPA - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [Internet]. EPA's Cleaning Up the Nation's Waste Sites: Markets and Technology Trends. 2004. [cited 2018 jun 09] Available from: http://www.epa.gov/superfund/accomp/news/30years.htm
YANG GCC, LIU CY. Remediation of TCE contaminated soils by in situ EK-Fenton process. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2001;85:317-331.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
