Estimation of the wet bulb globe temperature from temperature and relative humidity gradients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X27170Keywords:
Green areas, Urban parks, Heat index, Heat island, Freshness islandAbstract
In this study, maps of the estimated heat index for a preservation area in the city of Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil, were constructed using temperature and relative humidity gradients. Understanding microclimate variable behavior is useful for explaining the relationship between urban sprawl and increased environmental distress. The implementation and preservation of green areas is one way to mitigate the environmental impacts of human activities. Urban parks are one common type of green area in cities. According to ISO 7243, heat exposure can be assessed using the Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT). This study used multivariate statistical techniques and ordinary kriging to produce a WBGT map of the park during the dry and rainy seasons. Places with heat or freshness islands were identified. Locations along hiking trails and areas with exercise equipment were analyzed for WBGT tendencies in order to propose precautionary heat exposure measures.Downloads
References
AIROLA, A.; PAHIKKALA, T.; WAEGEMAN, W.; DE BAETS, B.; SALAKOSKI, T. An experimental comparison of cross-validation techniques for estimating the area under the ROC curve. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, V. 55, Issue 4, 2011, P. 1828-1844.
ALI, J. M.; MARSH, S. H.; SMITH, M. J. Modelling the spatiotemporal change of canopy urban heat islands. Building and Environment, V. 107, 2016, P. 64-78.
BUDD, G. Wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT) — its history and its limitations. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2008, v. 11, 20-32.
ISO 7243. Hot enviroments estimation of the heat stress on working man, based on the WBGT index (wet bulb globe temperature). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1989.
JEONG, M.; PARKA, S.; SONG, G. Comparison of human thermal responses between the urban forest area and the central building district in Seoul, Korea. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, V. 15, 2016, P. 133-148.
LIU, L.; LIN, Y.; WANG, D.; LIU, J. An improved temporal correction method for mobile measurement of outdoor thermal climates. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2016, p. 1-12.
MAYER, H.; HÖPPE, P. Thermal comfort of man in different urban environments, Theor. Appl. Climatol. 38, v. 1, 1987, 43-49.
OHASHI, Y.; KIKEGAWA, Y; IHARA, SUGIYAMA, T. Numerical simulations of outdoor heat stress index and heat disorder risk in the 23 wards of Tokyo, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 53 (2014) 583–597.
PARSONS, K. Heat stress standard ISO 7243 and its global application, Ind. Health, V. 44, v. 3, 2006, 368-379.
ROSHAN, G. R.; GHANGHERMEH, A. A.; ATTIA, S. Determining new threshold temperatures for cooling and
heating degree day index of different climatic zones of Iran. Renewable Energy, V. 101, 2017, P. 156-167.
SUGAWARA, H.; SHIMIZU, S.; TAKAHASHI, H.; HAGIWARA, S.; NARITA, K.; MIKAMI, T.; HIRANO, T. Thermal Influence of a Large Green Space on a Hot Urban Environment. J. Environ. Qual. ,45:125-133, 2016.
TAN, K. C.; LIM, H. S.; JAFRI, M. Z. M. Prediction of column ozone concentrations using multiple regression analysis and principal component analysis techniques: A case study in peninsular Malaysia. Atmospheric Pollution Research, V. 7, Issue 3, 2016, P. 533-546.
VILANOVA, S.R.F; CHICHORRO, J. F. Cerrado: aspectos Florísticos e estruturais. IN: GUARIM, V.L.M.S.;
VILANOVA, S.R.F. (Orgs.). Parque da cidade: aspectos socioambientais: Mãe Bonifácia. Cuiabá: EdUFMT, 2014. 133 p.
WANG, Y.; DE GROOT, R.; BAKKER, F.; WÖRTCHE, H.; LEEMANS, R. Thermal comfort in urban green spaces: a survey on a Dutch university campus. Int J Biometeorol, 2016.
ZHENG, S.; ZHAO, L.; LI, Q. Numerical simulation of the impact of different vegetation species on the outdoor thermal environment. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, V. 18, 2016, P. 138-150.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.