Interferência de Trichoderma spp. no crescimento do feijoeiro (Phaseolus vulgaris cv. carioca)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X27125Abstract
The objective this work was to evaluate the interference caused by the Trichoderma spp. in the growth of the bean plant (Phaseolus vulgaris cultivar Carioca). Then, it was used three isolates J10, I1 and TSM1 of Trichoderma spp. were inoculated in rice with peel and left in a climatic camera for four days. 40g of the inoculum were inoculated in sterili soil (vases with capacity of 700g of soil) before after sowing (four repetitions and four plants for vase). After fifteen days of the sowing, the hight the plants, from the apex to the lap. It was verified significant differences in the growth of the bean plants.Downloads
References
ASSIS, T.C. Controle biológico de microrganismos presentes em sementes de mamona (Ricinus comunis). Fitopatologia Brasileira, v.19, Suplemento, p. 269, agosto de 1994.
BETTIOL, W., GHINI, R. Controle biológico. Capo 36. In: BERGAMIN FILHO, A., KIMATI, H., AMORIN, L. Manual de fitopatologia. 3. ed. São Paulo: Agronômica Ceres, 1995. 919 p. 2v. V1.
FERNANDEZ-LARREA, O.V. Microorganismos entomopatógenos y antagonistas. Posibilidades de produción. C. de La Habana : INISAV, 1995. 15 p. (Boletim Técnico, 1).
LUZ, W.C. da. Controle biológico das doenças na espermosfera. Cap. 3. In: BETTIOL, W. (org.) Controle biológico de doenças de plantas. Jaguariúna : EMBRAPA-CNPDA, 1991.(EMBRAPA-CNPDA. Documentos, 15).
MELO, I.S. de. Potencialidades de utilização de Trichoderma spp. no controle biológico de doenças de plantas. Cap. 9. In: BETTIOL, W. (org.) Controle biológico de doenças de plantas. Jaguariúna: EMBRAPA-CNPDA, 1991. (EMBRAPA-CNPDA. Documentos, 15).
MENEZES, M. Avaliação de espécies de Trichoderma no tratamento de sementes de feijão e do solo, visando o controle de Macrophomina phaseolina. Fitopatologia Brasileira, v.17, n.2, p. 159, agosto de 1992.
PIMENTEL, C.P.V., CORAL, F.J., LUCON, C.M.M., FARIA, R.G. Efeito de Trichoderma viride sobre Phytophthora spp. Fitopatologia Brasileira, v.19, Suplemento, p. 301, agosto de 1994.
PORFÍRIO-SILVA, Z., HOMECHIN, M. Pseudomonas spp. e Trichoderma spp.: promotores de crescimento de plântulas de tomateiro. Fitopatologia Brasileira, v.17, n.2, p. 217, agosto de 1992.
RAMIREZ, I.S., LÓPEZ, M.O., GARCíA, D., et al. Trichoderma harzianum (cepa A 34): un biopreparado de amplio espectro para micopatologías dei tomate y dei pimiento. C. de La Habana: INISAV, 1995. 36 p. (CID-INISAV Boletín Técnico, 3).
ROSA, C.R.E, SILVA, A.C.F. Avaliação de isolados de Trichoderma spp. visando o controle de Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. In: JORNADA ACADÊMICA INTEGRADA, 13. Santa Maria - RS, 1998. Anais … Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, 1998.
SILVA, A.C.F. da. Uso da radiação gama para obtenção de mutantes de Trichoderma harzianum Rifai e Trichoderma viride Pers.: Fr. com capacidade melhorada no controle ao Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary. Tese de Doutorado. (Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura - USP) Piracicaba: Universidade de São Paulo, 1997.
SILVA, A.C.F. da, MELO, I.S. Influência da luz no crescimento micelial e produção de esporos em diferentes linhagens de Trichoderma spp. In: REUNIÃO SOBRE CONTROLE BIOLÓGICO DE DOENÇAS DE PLANTAS, 1. Anais ... Piracicaba, Fundação Cargil ,1986.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
