Sanidade de Sementes e Emergência de Plântulas de Nabo Forrageiro, Aveia Preta e Centeio Submetidas a Tratamentos com Bioprotetor e Fungicida
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X9700Abstract
The genus Trichoderma is represented by non pathogenic fungithat exercise antagonism to several phytopathogens through the parasitismand/or antibiosis and, have been used as biocontrole agents, growthpromoters and to improve the germination and sanity of seeds. The objectiveof this work was to compare the efficiency of the biological and chemicaltreatment in the sanity of seeds of forrage turnip (Raphanus sativus L.),black oat (Avena strigosa S.), rye (Secale cereale L.) and the emergency ofseedlings of forrage turnip. The evaluation of the sanity was done throughthe method of filter paper, and for evaluation of the emergency and seedlingsdevelopment, using styrofoam trays in the green-house.Were tested: T1 Rhodiauram®SC (500g/Kg of Thiram); T2 - Agrotrich®; T3 Rhodiauram®SC + Agrotrich®; T4 - Rhodiauram® SC (2:00) +Agrotrich® and T5 - Control. The treatments that controlled 100% theincidence of the fungi of the seeds of black oat were T1 and T4; of ryewere the treatments T1, T2, T4; and of forrage turnip the treatments T2and T4. The seeds of black oat and rye did not germinate due to physiologicproblems. For the forrage turnip, significant difference was not verifiedamong the treatments for the emergency test and emergency speed, andthe treatments T2, T3 and T4 presented the largest seedlings heights. Thebiocontrol product Agrotrich® alone or in combination with chemicalcontrol improved the sanity of forrage turnip, black oat, and rye and theheight of forrage turnip seedlings.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
