PREDICTION BY MULTIVARIATE CALIBRATION OF QUALITY PARAMETERS OF COFFEE RESIDUES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X17124Keywords:
Coffee. Ultimate analysis. NIR spectroscopy. Chemometrics.Abstract
http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/2179460X17124
The real time prediction of the quality of the coffee biomass parameters allow greater efficiency in the energy industry and its production process, allowing the determination of multiple chemical components, while avoiding the extensive sample preparation. Multivariate calibration models using spectra obtained by near infrared spectroscopy (NIR) have been developed to predict the following properties of coffee: moisture, ash, fixed carbon and volatile content. Satisfactory results were obtained demonstrating the importance of methodology from the economic point of view, but also environmental, since residues from the coffee industry (husks) were evaluated and demonstrated use of potential.
Downloads
References
Ali, M.; Emsley, A.M.; Herman, H.; Heywood, R.J. Spectroscopic studies of the ageing of cellulosic paper. Polym. 42 (2001) 2893-2900.
ASTM D 3173-87. Standard method for determination of moisture content in biomass; 2003.
ASTM D 3174-04. Standard method for ash in the analysis sample of coal and coke; 2004.
ASTM D 3175-07. Standard method for volatile matter in the analysis sample of coal; 2007.
Barbin, D.F.; Felicio, A.L.S.M.; WenSunb, D.; Nixdorf, S.L.; Hirooka, E.Y. Application of infrared spectral techniques on quality and compositional attributes of coffee: An overview. Food Res. Int. 61 (2014) 23–32.
Bruun, S.; Jensen, J.W.; Magid, J.; Lindedam, J.; Engelsen, S.B. Prediction of the degradability and ash content of wheat straw from different cultivars using near infrared spectroscopy. Ind. Crop Prod. 31 (2010) 321–326.
Everard, C. D.; McDonnell, K.P.; Fagan, C.C. Prediction of biomass gross calorific values using visible and near infrared spectroscopy. Biomass Bioenerg. 45 (2012) 203-211.
Geladi, P.; Kowalski, B.R. Partial least squares regression: A tutorial. Anal. Chim. Acta. 185 (1986) 1-17.
Gillespie, G.D.; Everard, C.M.; McDonnell, K.P. Prediction of biomass pellet quality indices using near infrared spectrocopy. Energy 80 (2015) 582-588.
ICO. International Coffee Organization. Disponível em http://www.ico.org/. Acessado: Janeiro/2013.
Kiran, E.U.; Trzcinski, A.P.; Jern Ng, W.; Liu,Y. Bioconversion of food waste to energy: A review. Fuel 134 (2104) 389-399.
Krzyzaniak,M.; Stolarski, M.J.; Waliszewska,B.; Szczukowski, S.; Tworkowski, J.; Załuski, D.; Snieg, M. Willow biomass as feedstock for an integrated multi-product biorefinery. Ind. Crop Prod. 58 (2014) 230–237
Lestander, T. A.; Rhen, C. Multivariate NIR spectroscopy models for moisture, ash and calorific content in biofuels using bi-orthogonal partial least squares regression. Analyst 130 (2005) 1182–1189.
Lestander, T. A.; Geladi, P. NIR spectral information used to predict water content of pine seeds from multivariate calibration. Can. J. For. Res. 35 (2005) 1139–1148.
MARTENS, H.; NAES, T. Multivariate Calibration. John Wiley e Sons, New York, 1996.
Murthy, P.S.; Naidu, M.M. Sustainable management of coffee industry by-products and value addition — A review. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 66 (2012) 45-58.
Pasquini, C. Near Infrared Spectroscopy: Fundamentals, Practical Aspects and Analytical Applications. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. v. 14, p.198-219, 2003.
Rambo, M.K.D; Amorim, E.P; Ferreira, M.M.C. Potential of visible-near infrared spectroscopy combined with chemometrics for analysis of some constituents of coffee and banana residues. Anal. Chim. Acta 775 (2013) 41-49.
Santos, R.C.; Carneiro, A.C.O.; Trugilho, P.F.; Mendes, L.M.; Carvalho, A.M.M.L. Análise termogravimétrica em clones de eucalipto como subsídio para a produção de carvão vegetal. Cerne 18 (2012) 143-151.
Savitzky, A.; Golay M.J. E. Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures. Anal. Chem. 36 (1964) 1627-1638.
Shenk, J. S.; Workman, J. J.; Westerhaus, M. O. Application of NIR Spectroscopy to Agricultural Products. In: (3 ed.). Burns, D. A. & Biurczak, E. W. Handbook of Near-Infrared Analysis, Florida, 2008.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.