Schopenhauer and the Two Orders of Purposiveness in the World

Auteurs

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179378667452

Mots-clés :

Schopenhauer, Teleology, Nature, Soteriology

Résumé

In this paper, I intend to argue that the emergence of the material conditions for the suppression and denial of the will in the human organism (the extraordinary and to some extent “unnatural” development of the brain) is not something like an “accident on the way” of will's manifestation in the world. It is rather, as it were, an intentional result of the whole process of objectivation of the will, a result that emerges from a teleological order. This teleological order is primary and more fundamental than the teleological order of nature that produces each phenomenon and each organic structure according to its ability to promote the emergence, conservation and expansion of life. This means that we have to understand the problematic principle of nature's purposiveness in Schopenhauer's thought as containing two distinct and largely contradictory orders of purpose. We can call these two orders of purposiveness “order of nature” and “order of salvation” (in analogy to Schopenhauer’s “kingdom of nature” and “kingdom of grace”). These two orders of purpose correspond to what I understand to be two forms of teleology that coexist in constant tension in his system: a functional and an ethical-soteriological teleology.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Biographie de l'auteur

William Mattioli, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ

Professor do Departamento de Filosofia da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro e do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia da mesma universidade. Doutor em Filosofia pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

Références

ATZERT, S. Zwei Aufsätze über Leben und Tod: Sigmund Freuds Jenseits des Lustprinzips und Arthur Schopenhauers Transscendente Spekulation über die anscheinende Absichtlichkeit im Schicksal des Einzelnen. Schopenhauer Jahrbuch, v. 86, p. 179-194, 2005.

BRANDÃO, E. A concepção de matéria na obra de Schopenhauer. São Paulo: Humanitas, 2008.

CACCIOLA, M. A questão do finalismo na filosofia de Schopenhauer. Revista Discurso, n. 20, p. 79-98, 1993.

DEBONA, V. A grande e a pequena ética de Schopenhauer. ethic@, Florianópolis, v. 14, n. 1, p. 36-56, julho de 2015.

DE CIAN, N. Unintelligent Purposes. Schopenhauer’s Way over Kantian Teleology. In: ILLETTERATI, L.; MICHELINI, F. (eds.). Purposiveness. Teleology Between Nature and Mind. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2008.

GOLDSCHMIDT, A. Schopenhauer lecteur de Lamarck: le problème des causes finales. In: GOLDSCHMIDT, A. Écrits. Paris: Vrin, 1984.

KOßLER, M. „Das Leben ist nur ein Spiegel“ – Schopenhauers kritischer Lebensbegriff. ethic@, Florianópolis, v. 11, n. 2, p. 1-15, julho de 2012.

MALTER, R. Schopenhauers Transzendentalismus. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, v. 8, n. 1, p. 433-455, 1983.

MALTER, R. Arthur Schopenhauer: Transzendentalphilosophie und Metaphysik des Willens. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 1991.

MATTIOLI, W. O paradoxo das causas finais: Schopenhauer leitor da “Crítica do juízo teleológico”. Revista de Filosofia Aurora, v. 30, n. 49, p. 205-235, 2018.

MATTIOLI, W. Morte, vida e destino em Schopenhauer e Freud: os “fins da natureza” na metafísica da vontade e na metapsicologia. Voluntas: Revista Internacional de Filosofia, v. 11, n. 2, p. 348-381, 2020.

SCHOPENHAUER, A. Sämtliche Werke. Hrsg. v. Paul Deussen. München: Piper Verlag, 1911-1926.

SCHOPENHAUER, A. The World as Will and Representation. Volume I. Trad. Judith Norman, Alistair Welchman and Christopher Janaway. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

SCHOPENHAUER, A. The World as Will and Representation. Volume II. Trad. E. F. J. Payne. New York: Dover Publications, 1966.

SCHOPENHAUER, A. On Will in Nature. Trad. David E. Cartwright, Edward E. Erdmann and Christopher Janaway. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

SCHOPENHAUER, A. Parerga and Paralipomena. Short Philosophical Essays. Volume One. Trad. E. F. J. Payne. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

SCHOPENHAUER, A. Parerga and Paralipomena. Short Philosophical Essays. Volume Two. Trad. E. F. J. Payne. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

SCHOPENHAUER, A. Der handschriftlicher Nachlaß in fünf Bänden. Hrsg. v. Arthur Hübscher. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, 1985.

SCHOPENHAUER, A. Metaphysik der Natur. Textgrundlage: Arthur Schopenhauers handschriftlicher Nachlaß: Philosophie Vorlesungen, hrsg. von Franz Mockrauer. In: Arthur Schopenhauers sämtliche Werke, hrsg. von Dr. Paul Deussen, Bd. X, München: R. Piper Verlag, 1913.

ZENTNER, M. „Das Ziel alles Lebens ist der Tod“. Schopenhauer und Freuds Todestrieb. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, v. 75, p. 319-339, 1993.

Publiée

2021-12-28 — Mis à jour le 2022-03-23

Versions

Comment citer

Mattioli, W. (2022). Schopenhauer and the Two Orders of Purposiveness in the World . Voluntas: International Journal of Philosophy, 12, e13. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179378667452 (Original work published 28 décembre 2021)